Not voting:
With 12 alive It takes 7 to lynch. Day ends in: (expired on 2015-01-22 22:14:00)
In post 227, farside22 wrote:Ari: I think your reason, testing waters comment is crap.
I agree that lal is scummy.
In post 228, Lalendra wrote:In post 227, farside22 wrote:Ari: I think your reason, testing waters comment is crap.
I agree that lal is scummy.
Can you elaborate?
In post 234, Lalendra wrote:honestly you saying I'm scum just based on my ari vote, with almost no reasoning to back it up, makes me feel a possible ari/farside scumteam. Or possibly werewolves, since as it was pointed out earlier there's only two of those.
In post 226, Lalendra wrote:I'd really like to hear more from Young, Vyse and prawn.
In post 235, farside22 wrote:In post 234, Lalendra wrote:honestly you saying I'm scum just based on my ari vote, with almost no reasoning to back it up, makes me feel a possible ari/farside scumteam. Or possibly werewolves, since as it was pointed out earlier there's only two of those.
I've said more then that and I'm voting ari for an actual reason.
Your reason was naked vote bs.
You meta read on ari was vague. Show how you explained the meta as you stating it was town or scum meta.
Explain mislynch then a vote on ari with one post
Explain why multiple people who know meta about each other would have anyone lie.
You know why you can't.
Because it makes no sense
Nice omgus comment.
From town to scum based on Jack fucking shit
In post 236, Lalendra wrote:Sorry what's omgus?
In post 238, acryon wrote:In post 235, farside22 wrote:In post 234, Lalendra wrote:honestly you saying I'm scum just based on my ari vote, with almost no reasoning to back it up, makes me feel a possible ari/farside scumteam. Or possibly werewolves, since as it was pointed out earlier there's only two of those.
I've said more then that and I'm voting ari for an actual reason.
Your reason was naked vote bs.
You meta read on ari was vague. Show how you explained the meta as you stating it was town or scum meta.
Explain mislynch then a vote on ari with one post
Explain why multiple people who know meta about each other would have anyone lie.
You know why you can't.
Because it makes no sense
Nice omgus comment.
From town to scum based on Jack fucking shit
How much of Lalendra's play do you think could be contributed to what seems to be relative unfamiliarity with at least online mafia?
In post 239, farside22 wrote:
I thought they came from another site that plays mafia. I recall one said something about lal always killing them.
In post 240, West9 wrote:Lal's only played one game on our site. The "always killing me" was exaggeration from Metal, who knows her irl.
In post 215, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
3) i have no clue what a lot of peopel here are saying. Lal's posts don't make sense to me and I hope that I don't have to explain why.
In post 215, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Also, asking for background on people who know each other IRL seemed odd to me, knowing everyone’s meta isn’t really that helpful when people can just lie about other people’s meta and their history in games together.
you are suggesting to me that when i post "hey tell me about your meta" to 8-odd people that they will all lie to me? wouldn't we just lynch the people who are lying? what?
In post 229, Lyserg-Zeroz wrote:Yo, Lalendra: After more interactions with people since your last read-list, can you give me an update on your previous scumleans and on how their/our lynches compare to an Ari lynch for you?
In post 196, Aristophanes wrote:As for the New Years thing, yeah, I remembered that conversation and was somewhat wary of quicklynching when I came into D1. I wanted to test the waters with this crowd though regardless.
In post 199, Aristophanes wrote:It was a fun time! I have no clue if there was something significant I was supposed to remember though...
In post 240, West9 wrote:Lal's only played one game on our site. The "always killing me" was exaggeration from Metal, who knows her irl.
In post 244, Metalcyanide wrote:In post 240, West9 wrote:Lal's only played one game on our site. The "always killing me" was exaggeration from Metal, who knows her irl.
She killed me in two games. Once as a mafia bomb once as the hammer vote. Sorry it was a bit of an exaggeration, she is still new to mafia.
I was theorizing out loud moreso than accusing. If you, Metal, and Lalendra are scum together, the grouping is being messy about it. You specifically have not been messy. I suppose this was more myself putting an FoS than anything else.Of the three, you're lowest on my scumdar.In post 206, West9 wrote:I know it's late and I'm tired but I had another question for Ari: what about my play is striking you as "messy?" That's something I haven't heard yet
k, what does this mean? I'm open to a conversation about this if you like. Not that I have much to say. Whatever floats your boat though.In post 227, farside22 wrote:Ari: I think your reason, testing waters comment is crap.
I agree that lal is scummy.
So, here we go.In post 242, Lalendra wrote:
Ari – as Acryon pointed out in 181, there is something off about his play in this game. The “I posted a vote on metal just to see what would happen because I didn’t have time for a real post” could be legit, but doesn’t ring true. When he finally came back to the game after being away for a bit, he tunneled in on me, West and Metal, without really saying anything about anyone else until later. That could have just been because he was pressed for time. The stuff West said wasn’t particularly vague, so his point about me leaving a scumtrail also didn’t ring true. Seems like he’s just picking out parts of my meta that will implicate me in this, to plant the seed of doubt with everyone, without creating any real solid tie-ins. Also this:
In post 196, Aristophanes wrote:As for the New Years thing, yeah, I remembered that conversation and was somewhat wary of quicklynching when I came into D1. I wanted to test the waters with this crowd though regardless.
In post 199, Aristophanes wrote:It was a fun time! I have no clue if there was something significant I was supposed to remember though...
Reconcile these two statements, if you can.
In post 248, Lyserg-Zeroz wrote:Quickposting because need Ari to see it (also other people who've played with her, like Ginko heads and specially @Metal):
From ISOing Lal's first game (scumLalendra) and looking at this one I feel like there's a noticeable lack of curiosity or of questioning in how she behaved in both games. Maybe I'm wrong 'cause I just quick-skimmed over to check right now, but the only semblance of curiosity or engaging with others (rather than being asked stuff by others) is either via rethroical questions or questions that directly involve people's read on her or questions to you that I could see as she trying to deflect from your suspicion (@Lal: I mean, if he is mentioning three people that's not exactly a tunnel). I haven't checked the "Keely's BS" game yet because I hadn't realised she was there until just now, so: Is this kind of reactionary play just her style? Because otherwise, it seems scummy to me.