In post 1446, I Am Innocent wrote:I feel like there's very little reason to suspect either D3X or TDA beyond "OMG I'M IN A HOOD. LETS BE UNRATIONALLY PARANOID!" Even if there were scum in TDA/dx there's still
a bunch of
scum outside of the hood.
Spoiler:
townie response
lol no
peace is not in my hood.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1446, I Am Innocent wrote:I feel like there's very little reason to suspect either D3X or TDA beyond "OMG I'M IN A HOOD. LETS BE UNRATIONALLY PARANOID!" Even if there were scum in TDA/dx there's still
In post 1448, I Am Innocent wrote:PEOPLE IT DOESN'T MATTER IF NERO IS RIGHT OR NOT (AND IF HE IS, IT'S PROBABLY MORE CONDEMNING), BUT IS IT A SCUM SLIP?????
You'll get my answer in about a week or two why I don't think it's a scum slip.
2. Ika
17. randomidget
4. dragonspawn
1. Albert B. Rampage
8. StrangerCoug
9. Flubbernugget
13. Kid A
12. I Am Innocent
19. TellTaleHeart
16. PeaceBringer
6. DrippingGoofball
10. Garmr
11. NakedJogger
18. TheDudeAbides
3. d3x
5. Kthxbye
15. Nero Cain
least willing to lynch
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
3328 he used the word teammate. Granted the player he used it on was Garmr, a townie, but his coverup on the next page was pretty weak (had a town read on garmr so he thought of him as a teammate). Teammates are how scum think, so it was definitely a slip that scum would use...
With 19, 5 scum would be reasonable based on the number of town powers there could be, or heck there could be multi-ball with two teams of 3 and one hit a BP or doc protection last night...so many different possibilities to be sure that there are 4 scum
If Nero flips scum, garmr moves way up my scum list for his pop-in and diffusion. Lurk much?
lol. I think its p lame how you are trying to use last games "slip" that wasn't a slip to try to influence this game. In fact I think your whole "Nero is playing like last game" is shoddy as fuck.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
and then I'm going to lynch those that didn't vote Ika
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1459, d3x wrote:@Nero- Why did you Claim when you did?
I want ds be scared of me
Why are you against a ika wagon?
What do you think of tth trying to pin me and you together?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1465, TheDudeAbides wrote:Oh hay it's Dragonspawn, who still hasn't explained when his read on me changed.
you know, simply repeating it again and again doesn't make it true. Especially when I explained it when I changed my vote and again the first time you asked. I know you like lying in this game, but you seriously need to start being serious or the scum will win
In post 1283, dragonspawn wrote:I cannot figure out why tda keeps pretending that I haven't explained why and when i shifted my vote from him to pen day 1 as I told everyone at the time why and repeated it the first time he asked today.
LOL.
Let me be clear - at what post number did you change your mind.
". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1465, TheDudeAbides wrote:Oh hay it's Dragonspawn, who still hasn't explained when his read on me changed.
you know, simply repeating it again and again doesn't make it true. Especially when I explained it when I changed my vote and again the first time you asked. I know you like lying in this game, but you seriously need to start being serious or the scum will win
Also a quote where you think that you answered it would be good too.
". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.
In post 1283, dragonspawn wrote:I cannot figure out why tda keeps pretending that I haven't explained why and when i shifted my vote from him to pen day 1 as I told everyone at the time why and repeated it the first time he asked today.
LOL.
Let me be clear - at what post number did you change your mind.
yeah you can do your own homework. You've already proven multiple times that you ignore responses
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1283, dragonspawn wrote:I cannot figure out why tda keeps pretending that I haven't explained why and when i shifted my vote from him to pen day 1 as I told everyone at the time why and repeated it the first time he asked today.
LOL.
Let me be clear - at what post number did you change your mind.
yeah you can do your own homework. You've already proven multiple times that you ignore responses
No, you've never explained.
I can't quote your whole ISO here.
If you've done it, you can quote yourself.
". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.
Me and dragonspawn also have a pt we discussed a lot of things before the game and we mutually ended up town reading each other as day 1 progressed . This is why dragonspawn and me have been working together.
I had to explain to dragonspawn why two Pts had a increase chance of having scum in one and by keeping off one the scum is more likely to feel comfortable and slip up. His content in our pt is more than on here. It's also why i got suspicious of naked jogger in the first place because of his reasoning.