In post 47, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 46, Formerfish wrote: In post 45, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 44, Formerfish wrote:
In post 13, Boonskiies wrote:Don't wanna vote your scum buddy as a joke and have it come back to haunt you?
What if this is just really cheeky scum telling the truth?
Is rvs something you always avoid participating in?
no, I'm not scum. No, I don't always avoid it, but it becomes more apparent it is useless every game I play in.
That sounds a lot like something scum would say.
Can you show what games you have avoided rvs?
If you're not going to play serious why play?
In post 49, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 48, Formerfish wrote: In post 45, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 44, Formerfish wrote:
In post 13, Boonskiies wrote:Don't wanna vote your scum buddy as a joke and have it come back to haunt you?
What if this is just really cheeky scum telling the truth?
Is rvs something you always avoid participating in?
no, I'm not scum. No, I don't always avoid it, but it becomes more apparent it is useless every game I play in.
I'm confused by that last post of yours? Care to elaborate on what you mean?
Why the focus on me? Do you really find the RVS a necessity to finding scum?
In post 56, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 52, Formerfish wrote:Because I don't like your hop onto the acryon wagon, I don't like how cagey you are being with me. I don't like how I have to ask you the same question multiplettimes to get you to answer. I feel like scum has more to hide by not participating in rvs. Because I am trying to sort you and at the moment I am finding you wanting. Want to dance and be a good dance partner or do I have to start treating you like a hostile witness?
I'm not being cagey. I just think it's silly to make a mountain out of a molehill this early on day 1. If you really think I'm scum then vote away, we'll see if anyone agrees with you.
In post 121, MonkeyMan576 wrote:If you are going to ride Formerfish's coattails the whole game you guys are in trouble. At least when I get lynched and flip town lynch Formerfish next.
first off is that whole shitstorm re: FF. I really like the conviction here. while I can look at it and do think it was a bit of an overreaction, I think in this case it's more likely to come from indignated town whose playstyle is mostly centered around trying to outyell FF and make him look worse as opposed to presenting logic-based arguments. I also think that early game, making strong pushes is the best way to move the game forward and create new content, and I don't think scum would put themselves so far out there so quickly for (as far as I could tell) no reason. I look at this and think it's more likely to come from town who legitimately think they're onto something as opposed to scum pushing any kind of agenda. there are also some parallels here to the previous game I played with him; I can confirm MM tends to dislike when people push more strongly than what he perceives as necessary in RVS, and I can confirm that he does this regardless of how much of a reach his own reasons for pushing people are.
now, this isn't much of a tell on its own, but it is the first part of a long series of posts that I think are more likely to come from a town "I don't care what people think" POV, which makes me think his posts are coming from a consistently town mindset. IME it's generally pretty difficult for scum to fake that kind of attitude throughout the entire game, and I think he's hit a lot of genuine notes here.
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Well, I thought it would be considered an OMGUS, but if you insist.
Vote: Formerfish
I really don't think anyone as scum would actually post this. like, I know it's almost too-dumb-to-be-scum, but I think this is another post that fits more with a town "I don't care what people think" mentality as opposed to having an agenda.
In post 123, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I invited the attention by my anti-RVS stance, it doesn't make me scum. A lot of people are exaggerating the link between RVS and lynching the bad guys.
this indicates that he knew he was inviting attention with his anti-RVS stance and didn't have a problem with it. again, I think this is more likely to come from a town mindset as opposed to scum pushing an agenda.
In post 217, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Nice that you're trying to discredit me. You seem nervous, the exact oposite of Elbirn.
more conviction I liked (re: copper). like, I don't think his accusation of discrediting/nervous was remotely correct, but it's another post I look at and I think it's more likely to come from a town player who comes out swinging at anyone who so much as pokes at him as opposed to scum pushing any kind of agenda. I would expect (again) that if he was scum trying to discredit copper here, he would at the very least be able to give more of a shit about his appearance; imo the way he's willing to go around antagonizing basically everyone in the game is more indicative of a town mindset
In post 619, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Mostly I am trying to get a feel for everyone because I haven't played with most of the people in the game afaik. It's not a quick process in this game unfortunately.
In post 628, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Elbirn and formerfish strike me as the type of people that like to pressure vote and reaction vote, so it doesn't really bother me. I know I'm town and I'm not the best lynch today.
I liked his thought process here, it came off very genuine to me; I can absolutely buy that he was having trouble finding his footing in the game and was focusing more on trying to get into the mindsets of other players. this is even more so the case when:
In post 640, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Town:
Monkeyman576
RadiantCowbells(innocent child)
Elbirn
Formerfish
Cheetory6
Boonskies
Null:
Futan
Toon Fighter
eektor
SiX
acryon
Scum
he decided one of his top scum reads (FF) was no longer scum. I absolutely buy that he didn't like the way FF was playing, but then realized FF's flip-over-all-the-tables-and-pressure-everyone attitude was normal for him and then had no idea where to go next so he sat back and observed for a while. plus, if you look at his copper vote (at the point where he moved off FF), it came I think 4 RL days before this switch, which is definitely enough time to make that kind of reevaluation. this whole thing came across pretty genuine, really
I admit I don't like his scum reads. however, as I said, I don't expect most of what he does to actually make any sense, so I'm willing to look past it.
In post 846, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not sure what with Toon's emphasis on "if X is scum, Y is town" relational tells. To me it seems really weak reasoning and like he's grasping at straws.
I liked this. this basically mirrored my thoughts as I read through it, and he was (afaik? someone correct me if I'm wrong here, I might have missed some stuff) the first to point out how TF was abusing relational tells, which shows he's actually thinking about it and coming up with new opinions.
In post 879, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't have a thin skin at all.
Obviously your reading comprehension skills are lacking because you think I have only one reason for voting Toon, when I also blatantly said his relational reads were stretches. You are looking for confirmation bias when it comes to scum reading me, which is obvious on so many levels. Your original push on me early in day one for not liking RVS was crap too. In fact your overall play this game has been bad.
this is MM576 talking to someone they think is town (FF). I liked this more or less because if MM is scum here, he has had no problem bringing out the "discredit everyone pushing you" angle in the past. however, it's completely missing here. I think if he was scum, he would be more likely to revert back to that kind of attitude when FF makes another push on him; however, instead we get an attempt to call FF out on what he perceives as bad play. imo it shows he actually is forming and holding a consistent read here, as opposed to just doing whatever he can to get out of pressure.