Mini 1646: Quil's Smalltown (Game over!)

[xRECKONERx]

@DV: Yeah your assessment of my posts is fair but I'm usually more cautious/guarded and "giving a fuck"ish as scum

This game is more a symptom of why I don't usually do large games anymore, because D1 is basically just me sitting around twiddling my thumbs and then if I live long enough something will kickstart my care-o-meter later on

[Bookitty]

This game is more a symptom of why I don't usually do large games anymore, because D1 is basically just me sitting around twiddling my thumbs and then if I live long enough something will kickstart my care-o-meter later on

This is not a large game.

[xRECKONERx]

LOL HOLY FUCK IT'S NOT WOOOOW i got this game confused w/ another one siiiiiigh

okay actually knowing that in my head now it makes it easier to kinda dig in

[xRECKONERx]

VOTE: Pine

[Bookitty]

@Reck: Please do. Worst case scenario, we have two lynches before we lose. We don't have unlimited time and your role could be critical to a town win if you use it correctly.

[DeasVail]

Boo, my position on grib is much the same as Shii's. I can see why people find him scummy, but there are posts that I have trouble seeing from scum. It's why I really want to see what his replacement is like.

[DeasVail]

VOTE: Pine

I might be ok with this, but his reason for townreading boo gives me pause.

I know this is pretty bad as a reason but it's affecting things all the same.

[Bookitty]

Boo, my position on grib is much the same as Shii's. I can see why people find him scummy, but there are posts that I have trouble seeing from scum. It's why I really want to see what his replacement is like.

We have time now. We're on pause until he's replaced and I hope very much that we can have some added time for the replacement to get up to speed. I will push for that when the replacement arrives.

That should not be construed as a reason for Reck to dump a vote and not participate. Reck, we need you. Please.

[Antihero]

ok, cutting through all the walls, it seems like the general thing w/ grib is ppl saying "i'm townreading him <no reason>" i think dv went into the most depth, but even he's p light on the details.

i think i'm on the right track.

[Jingle]

I forgot about this entirely. You guys get at least an hour tomorrow. Sorry about that.

[farside22]

Boo: how did I stop you from questioning aronis? You asked me a question and I responded is how the whole argument started from my prospective.

Arnois: I get the reason you are getting run up is crap in your book and the boo feelings, but doing nothing if your town doesn't help the game. I had issues with boo pushing your role as a reason to lynch you knowing there is a backup in the game.

[Quilford]

• 
  
  Vote count 1.12
  
  
  Viomi (4)— Antihero, Jingle, Bookitty, VictorDeAngelo
  Pine (2)— farside22, xRECKONERx
  Aronis (2)— Marquis, Flubbernugget
  VictorDeAngelo (1)— DeasVail
  farside22 (1)— Pine
  Bookitty (1)— Aronis
  
  Not Voting (2)— Viomi, Shiidaji
  
  It takes 7 to lynch or no lynch.
  
  
  Deadline
  
  
  >> Day 1 will be 10 days long. The deadline has resumed, with (expired on 2015-02-26 05:18:06) to go. <<
  
  
  Mod notes
  
  
  Viomi replaces Grib. Many thanks, and welcome!
  
  Remember, you can request an updated Role PM containing your selected role's info any time you like, as detailed in the Setup post.

[Viomi]

/confirm, replacing Grib c:

@Quilford, could you send me the updated Role PM? I'd like to know exactly what an Insomniac does (I haven't really heard of it)

Now to look through Grib's posts and figure out why the fuck he was acting so scummy :L

[VictorDeAngelo]

In related news, Victor's post does little to make me uncomfortable with the idea of lynching him so I'm still good with that so far.

Hey DaesVail, can you explain your initial scumread on my role?

VOTE: Pine

I don't like how quickly Reck threw this vote down after realising this wasn't a large game. Reck, can you explain this vote please?

/confirm, replacing Grib c:

@Quilford, could you send me the updated Role PM? I'd like to know exactly what an Insomniac does (I haven't really heard of it)

Now to look through Grib's posts and figure out why the fuck he was acting so scummy :L

See, scum slot. More votes here!

[Viomi]

Alright, so, first thing's first: Insomniac is a totally shitty role for mafia and they would never choose it in this setup. It tells you who targeted you in the night... Which doesn't do shit for mafia because they already know who has what role. So that's reason #1 why you should take your votes off me.

I'm mostly just posting so I can view the thread when I click "view your posts."

I also wanted to let you all know that I am town.

Loving the thread title, Quil.

I choose

Invictus

You think you may win scum but take me down and be sure I will bite back.

This is my favorite post so far.

I'll take

Insomniac

, please.

VOTE: Pine

Why do you hate me?

grib or jingle are fine for hot lynching too

Changed my mind about Grib.

Oh? Why is that?

Nothing Has Really Rappened Yet so I'm Just Posting to Post

, a story by Grib

God, I read this entire page and I want to respond to exactly zero of it.

Is there any way to use our roles in a sort of circle of protection, say A watches B who protects C who guards D who tracks E who blocks F and so on, to make it easier to catch the kill?

Soo, Grib starts out being hella boring and useless... I'm honestly not sure why. This is probably just how he plays early game, I'd guess. I can't really make any excuses for him here.

I'm working on breaking strategies, I'll let you know if one exists. In the meantime, what's your read on Farside/Boo/Aronis? Why are you voting Pine? Who else is worth voting in your opinion?

Oh, so apparently I'm not invisible. Neat.

Town, scum, and null-ish. These are leans. A lot of Aronis' responses to the pressure on him are pretty clipped and I don't know how to feel about it.

Pine was RVS and I don't care enough to move my vote.

I approve of the Bookitty wagon.

This is interesting.. He approves of the Bookitty wagon, but keeps his vote on his RVS? That's... Awkward... Again it's early game so.. No real excuses. If I wasn't his replacement I'd think it was pretty scummy obviously :L

Hi anti. You really need to stop looking at me with scum-tinted lenses.

I'd contribute more if the current topic of discussion didn't bore me. But now you're here, and you're always fun. Yay.

Blah blah, more fluff... Basically he was too lazy to do anything helpful.

Do you think aronis is scum? Did you think boo was using his role as a reason to lynch him or was it more about what he said this game?

I think the issue that grib has anti is silly. Looks to me anti may have done that to get a reaction to try and read grib better.

Not especially, but now I'm starting to agree that the whole him not posting thing is a possible Thing. Other than that I don't feel any particular way about him.

Boo's posts feel really self-motivated (fake edit: confirmed by her) and her push on Aronis feels like it's waaay more focused on his role than his actual gameplay. The problem I have is that Aronis is sort of justifying her a little bit in that he isn't especially towny

and

his role renders him basically invisible to town PRs. Her ISO posts (32-36) were bad (I can sort of get her misunderstanding my wording, but eh).

I like being silly with Anti.

I support the Grib wagon for reasons I've already given. I don't see a reason that he would keep his RVS vote on Pine while saying that he supports my wagon. It's like he doesn't want to be on my wagon himself but he'd like to see it progress a little further. Just not with HIM on it. But everyone else, Grib says it's okay. That seems pretty duplicitous to me. If you don't care enough to move your RVS vote, then your support is pretty meaningless.

"Reasons."

UNVOTE:

I'd maybe lynch Kitty, and I can also switch to Aronis later if necessary (unless he gets in here and towns it to the max), since he's likely going to be the deadline lynch. Unless I end up dead D1, which wouldn't be horrible considering my role is kind of useless and I can already tell this is going to be a weak towngame for me.

No one else sticks out to me.

Bookitty makes a good point here, I was curious as to why he wasn't voting her as well.

Let me make up for Grib's mistake, shall we?

VOTE: BooKitty

There we are, my vote is finally where Grib should've had it all along! Glad we remedied that quickly.

I'm sorry, everyone, but I won't be able to give this game the attention it deserves.

Mod, replace me please.

Annnd then he disappears. Looks like that's all the information I'm getting from my predecessor. Time to make a case:

BOOKITTY

Very active, with the most posts in the thread.

I would like to choose the

Archivist

please. Thanks so much!

She chooses: The archivist. A very interesting choice in my opinion. It could be very, VERY helpful for town, and gives her motivation as both town and scum to choose it. WIFOM. So I will disregard her choice as NULL.

If someone really hates their role, I am willing to trade mine (Archivist) if that's allowed by the Mod. I'm not really all that picky.

Just let me know!

This is where it gets

actually

interesting: She wants to change her role! Not only that, but she's willing to trade with anybody!
So instead of looking at why someone would

want

the Archivist, I'm going to look at why someone would

not

want the Archivist.

If BooKitty == Scum:
Being Archivist means you can see who targetted who.. Useless as scum. Really. Absolutely useless. Unless you're trying to find the SK.. Which still isn't very useful at all.

If BooKitty == Town:
Being Archivist means you can see who targetted who... Awesome as town. Choose a previous night phase and a player = you get to see who they targetted! And if they targetted the person who died that night... Well, you can determine by their role whether or not they're scum.

If BooKitty == SK:
Being Archivist means you can see who targetted who, which is mediocre at best for SK. Other roles would suit SK much better.

To sum it up: The only reason I could see BooKitty not wanting to be Archivist is if they're SK or Scum.. Either way they need to be lynched. (If you're SK, feel free to claim and I'm sure town is willing to work with you to help us kill scum, kay?)

I don't really see the Marquis role-related suspicion right now.

Encryptor is of no use to town for sure. But it's very useful for scum and so there's this:

First-level: Scum would take Encryptor.
Second-level: Town would take Encryptor to keep it from scum.
Second-level: Scum might not want to take Encryptor to avoid being obvious.

It's all speculation and WIFOM. The fact that Marquis took Encryptor FIRST makes it less likely to be first-level for me. There are more helpful and less obvious choices to make when all of them are available.

Since all the power roles are out there, I think it's going to be really important to express reads openly when we have them (not that I have any definite reads yet). This can help power roles target more accurately imo without giving scum clearcut answers on who will be targeted by any particular role.

Still waiting for an answer from Aronis.

So, first she points out that voting people based solely on their role choice is WIFOM because town could choose it to use it, scum could choose it to prevent town, SK could choose it for both, etc etc.

Here is a list of the chosen roles in order. I was reminding myself about what Invictus and Insomniac do, so I went ahead and put it in order of choosing:

Marquis, the Encryptor
Aronis, the Ascetic
DeasVail, the Bulletproof
xRECKONERx, the One-Shot Cop
Pine, the Gentleman Thief
Bookitty, the Archivist
farside22, the Invictus
Jake from State Farm, the Roleblocker
Shiidaji, the Bodyguard
Grib, the Insomniac
Jingle, the Coroner
Antihero, the Universal Backup
Flubbernugget, the Vengeful Vanilliser

I don't think people at the bottom of this list can really be judged based solely on the role they chose. Just my opinion, though.

@Aronis: Why do you think an ascetic is especially powerful in scum hands and should be kept out of them? I have a few ideas on this and want to understand your thought process when switching from roleblocker to ascetic. The reasons you gave seem odd to me.

Then, she says that

only

the people near the bottom of the list can't be judged for their role choice.
There's some inconsistency there, guys.

Roleblocker is a role I think scum would want to avoid in this game, though. Roleblocks that don't correspond with town interests (for instance, roleblocks on investigative roles) would be pretty obvious and would lead to suspicion and possible lynch. Because all the roles are out in the open, it's going to be much harder for scum to hide and still play effectively to their win condition.

This makes sense to me: Whoever the roleblocker is gets a slight townread from me.

Who here has played with aronis?

*Looks at reck*

Pretty sure you have.

Most people find him scummy.
His response is typical aronis. :headsmack:

Sorry about inactivity today; I fell asleep

@Farside: Does Aronis typically act this way regardless of alignment?

I haven't played with him before that I remember. My objection to him (apart from role related things, most notably the stutter-step about roleblocker vs. ascetic) is attitude. He's doling out information very sparingly and he seems really antagonistic in response to questions.

I asked him if he was confident in his ability to play power roles because that would have been an answer as to why one would pick ascetic over roleblocker. I'm not terribly confident myself but I'm planning on asking who I should target and then picking semi-randomly from the responses given. It's not like I need to hide in this game.

I think if you pick a role that can't be read you ought to be willing to eat the lynch because it's going to be necessary unless you town it up incredibly and basically prove yourself through other means. Aronis hasn't done that. He's done the opposite of that. You're saying he's abrasive, I think -- if he knows that, then it's on him to either choose a different role or to demonstrate he's town through play.

If this is his playstyle, we're going to have to lynch him at some point anyway for being unreadable and/or scummy. Why shouldn't it be today?

Pushing for a D1 scum/policy lynch... Seems to be making up reasons to get a lynch, regardless of if the person is just a bad town or actual scum. I'll answer your last question: It shouldn't be today because we could lynch

scum

and be way better off!

Your case on him is attitude. Attitude is a good reason for lynch if they're out of hand and being anti-town.. I'm not seeing that here.

The fact that he considered roleblocker and then changed to something else is the only thing suspicious about Aronis to me. I can imagine the thought process: "Ooh I can block town roles! *post* OH WAIT SHIT BUT THEY KNOW WHO THE ROLEBLOCKER IS! CHANGE! *post2*"

That is a reasonable D1 case. I feel more strongly about you being scum than I do him, though. More importantly, notice how you ask the question: "Why shouldn't it be today?"... But your vote isn't on him! I don't see you putting your vote where your mouth is at all. I see no reason why you wouldn't vote him at this point if you're already asking for his lynch. Town pressures to get information... You haven't even voted up to this point.

No vote + "Why shouldn't we lynch him now?!" = A few possibilities: You're scum buddies bussing, or you're scum / SK hiding under the radar. I don't like either of those.

I don't think you've been antagonistic to me. Post 124 is pretty antagonistic, and your tone with Marquis wasn't making me think of puppies and kittens either.

You've consistently given short answers and minimal information. The most recent example is when I asked you about your confidence in playing power roles. "Just depends." That's the attitude I mean, most specifically -- the shortest answer that gives the least information. I was trying to figure out your alignment, but your ISO is giving ZERO help in that.

Every reason you give for wanting to keep ascetic out of scum hands is a reason scum might want it. Choosing ascetic in the first place gives your slot an expiration date. I wouldn't think you'd be surprised that people want to lynch you since they can't investigate you. You're giving them nothing to read you with either.

This is where you start chasing your tail.

"I'm voting you for being ascetic because it's awesome for scum and town would want to keep it from scum- AKA I'm following the WIFOM I pointed out earlier!"

Scroll up a bit. See where she said "Town picks to keep it from scum" vs "scum wants it" is WIFOM? And now that's the case she's making against him? (Leaving out the part about being antagonistic because that isn't a scum tell.)

@Farside: It is a role he chose. It is not a randomly assigned role. It's a role he chose EARLY.

My questions to Aronis are two-pronged, not just one as you're trying to imply.

His CHOICE of role is such that he should expect to come under suspicion for it, especially given his own stated reasoning behind choosing it. Choosing ascetic precludes any investigation to clear himself. It's a role that can't be allowed to go to LYLO. I think anyone with any experience with ascetic would know that it would be a role with an expiration date.

The part you're ignoring or dismissing is that he's not being helpful to town. He's not. You don't even have him as a townread. You said you don't have experience of his scum game. Yet you're making the meta defence to end all meta defences on his behalf, in essence saying that he always plays like that. You don't KNOW that. If he DOES play like that all the time, though, he's unhelpful to town. His role is not helpful to town. He's doing nothing to help himself and you're doing all the heavy lifting. I would expect this level of defence if he was your mason buddy; we know he's not, though. You don't even think he's town.

I don't see scum-Farside making this defence for scum-Aronis, though. It's more likely to me that scum-Farside would make this concerted defence of town-Aronis or possible SK-Aronis to try to drum up some towncred.

I know you think that asking questions without a real reason is scummy. So you should know I'd spot that right away.

VOTE: Farside

Finally, a vote! However.. Not on the person you were hardpushing at first? Instead, you're voting someone for defending him, but state explicitly: "I don't see scum-Farside making this defence for scum-Aronis, though."

Does this mean you no longer thing Aronis is scummy? Are you saying a meta defense of which you have no meta on Aronis is Farside trying to get town-cred?
Personally, if I were seriously interested in this line of thinking, I would go meta the games with Aronis and Farside together and see if his information holds true... If it does, then it isn't scummy in the least.

I have no meta on Aronis, Farside. I don't think I have ever played with him at all. I haven't researched it either.

Well no shit. Before arguing on the topic of meta about a player, make sure you have meta of that player:

Otherwise I consider your opinion on his meta and the meta defense invalid.

Wow, are you actually reading the game, Farside? That's a mighty big post to have missed first time around, lady.

Woah woah woah! Hang on a second, I feel like you were just making a case against someone for being antagonistic. Pretty hypocritical if you ask me. I will agree Farside is acting pretty scummy to your small prodding questions, but not as scummy as you are.

^ ^ Finally, that is a farside I think I know.

UNVOTE:

That was a quick change of tone.. This is two posts from the last I quoted, yes? I feel like this is scummy for some reason.. Bus harder please.

People do use "highly doubt" synonymously with "know for a fact."

This is certainly not true. They are opposites.

Really? I do it all the time.

I highly doubt that you do that all the time.
I know for a fact that you do that all the time.

Do you think these two sentences mean the same thing?

I think they are opposites.

To me, you look like scum caught for the wrong reasons, but I'm biased because I thought you were scummy before.

Why didn't you join my one-person wagon when you approved of it? Why bother to approve of it if it's not even worth moving an RVS vote?

Blah blah blah, argues about grammar-

Oh good, something interesting at the end of that post there. A good question! If I were as silly as him, I would answer this! Sadly, I have literally no idea what he was thinking.

Hey Bookitty I see you not voting for Aronis anymore

Dude, I never voted for Aronis. I was trying to get a read out of him.

Oh god. Not this. Even I've used this defense as scum when I realize my case was absolute shit. "U-uh, I was pressuring for a read..!!"

Okay then, 'dude', if you say so.

Let me know if you want an explanation for why I started townreading Farside, Flubber. I don't really want to interfere with whatever you're doing with Anti, though.

Why just Flubber? I want an explanation badly.

I'm okay with an Aronis lynch at this point because I did everything I could think of to get him to post content and help town, including pressuring him heavily and then leaving him alone as per his request. I'm not sure he's scum. I just know that he's unhelpful and unreadable and that he can't be cleared through investigation, so we're going to have to lynch him sooner or later anyway. That doesn't have to be today though.

I support the Grib wagon for reasons I've already given. I don't see a reason that he would keep his RVS vote on Pine while saying that he supports my wagon. It's like he doesn't want to be on my wagon himself but he'd like to see it progress a little further. Just not with HIM on it. But everyone else, Grib says it's okay. That seems pretty duplicitous to me. If you don't care enough to move your RVS vote, then your support is pretty meaningless.

VOTE: Grib

I have a moderate townread on Farside. Waiting to hear more from Pine.

So before you wanted him lynched, then you were just pressuring for a read, and now you're wanting that lynch again. You're not sure he's scum, but are willing to lynch him

D1 even though you think there are people who might actually be scum?

I agree with your vote on Grib (me), as that was a pretty scummy move. I literally can't defend it.. I would if I could, but it looks just as scummy to me as it does to you. Damn you, Grib. Damn you.

Get back to me on that townread on Farside, would you? Thanks.

Okay. I have a selfish reason for wanting to lynch Aronis. I can't investigate him. All my other scumreads (and I'm playing most of those fairly close to the vest for a reason) I have a shot at catching. Not him.

I don't want the day to end yet because I need a lot more interaction with people. Voting Aronis now makes it less likely I choose right tonight.

I'm also considering having everyone who is willing to do so tell me three names they think are the most likely scum and working from that list. In that case, I'll happily lynch Aronis whenever.

What do you think of Grib, Farside?

You admit to having a selfish reason to lynch Aronis... That is, a reason besides helping town win. Does nobody realize how ridiculously scummy this is? Am I the only one who thinks having a selfish reason for pushing a lynch is hella scummy?

"I'm fully willing to lynch Aronis whenever, but let's push a different wagon even though I don't want the day to end yet!"
I.. I'm not even going to comment on this. This makes no sense.

I've noticed you aren't asking any interesting questions anymore; Just asking the guy you were trying to get lynched earlier what he thinks of Grib. What happened to your actual information seeking?

we should commit to the aronis lynch sooner rather than later

I'm not moving

Who are your top three scumreads, please?

Same question for everyone. If you're set to lynch Aronis sooner rather than later, then I need your help.

My top three scumreads, in order of importance:
You
You
and... You

1. Bookitty, can you talk me through the thought process leading to your unvote of Farside?
2. I also worry that while you are considering the 'why would town act like this?' question when it comes to Aronis, you're not considering the 'why would scum act like this?' one.

1. I was suspicious of Farside because she was throwing out suspicion on me without ever engaging me. Same with Pine. She showed no curiosity regarding the reasoning nor alignment of the people she was suspecting. She defended Aronis pretty fiercely without having a townread on him. It all wasn't adding up, plus I would think Farside would know why I was pushing the top wagon without calling for more votes on him nor voting him myself. (Hint: I wanted to figure out his alignment for myself for my own role-related reasons and not just go with the flow and lynch the first viable target. I also wanted to get reactions from other people to develop reads there.) She knows my role; everyone does. She wasn't working to get a better read on Aronis herself. She was just attacking my questioning.

The posts just above the one that I unvoted in was the first one that showed me any sign of the

curious

and intelligent scumhunter that I expect from Farside. I unvoted her because of that. In my experience, if you don't at all recognise the playstyle of a person you have pretty extensive personal meta with, it's because they are hiding a power role or they are scum. It couldn't be the first in this game. She's now back to a similar approach in defending Grib. I don't know just what to make of that.

You seem to be having some trouble. You seem to be wavering the shit on your read of Farside. I "don't know just what to make of that", either.

Ehh.. I could do more but I think that's a long enough wall for now. Reads and thoughts of other players coming when it's not 2:30 AM and I'm not exhausted. <3

[VictorDeAngelo]

@Viomi

- Have you read the whole game, or just ISOed Grib and Bookitty?

[Viomi]

@Viomi

- Have you read the whole game, or just ISOed Grib and Bookitty?

I had skimmed before messaging the mod to replace in, and then ISO'd the two of em.

[Viomi]

Mod: Can the target attempt to steal the ascetic role?

[Viomi]

Mod: Can the target attempt to steal the ascetic role?

Can the thief* attempt to steal the ascetic role?

:L

[Bookitty]

It's been a while since I've seen the Amished tell.

I've already explained my reasoning for offering my role to someone else. I thought about it, didn't think scum would want it and didn't mind giving it up for someone else if they were going to be stuck with something less cool. I'm not the world's most confident power role player anyway.

One trend I'm noting is that you're not really responding to my posts but rather making up things and then responding to them as if I said them. I said nothing about SK in Post 87. It's a weird misrep to say that I did when the quote is RIGHT THERE.

Another weird misrep:

I said: "I don't think people at the bottom of this list can really be judged based solely on the role they chose. Just my opinion, though."

You said: "Then, she says that only the people near the bottom of the list can't be judged for their role choice."

You do realize my quote is right there and it doesn't say what you say it says? I said people at the bottom didn't have as much choice. They can't be judged SOLELY on that, because they didn't have as much choice.

It's like if there's a choice of chocolate, vanilla or strawberry ice cream. I'll pick strawberry. You pick chocolate. We can't then point at the person stuck with vanilla and mock them.

I have said time and again that I don't have a read on Aronis. I have tried everything I can think of to derive one without just borrowing Marquis's meta or Farside's meta. Aronis had like four votes on him throughout the time I was voting him. How would my vote make more of an impression than my words at that point?

As for your other arguments, you need to do more than just ISO two players before you understand what was going on in the game.

[Bookitty]

For those who don't know it:

Amished Tell

[Viomi]

I said: "I don't think people at the bottom of this list can really be judged based solely on the role they chose. Just my opinion, though."

You said: "Then, she says that only the people near the bottom of the list can't be judged for their role choice."

Those.. Say the same thing, hun.

[VictorDeAngelo]

No they don't.

[Chrimi]

For those who don't know it:

Amished Tell

Hm hm, what's this we have here?

Also a case made on my predecessor is useless to me, I can't defend against stuff he did.

Oh and I have three people voting me, why would I be desperately trying to find something to defend myself against? I honestly don't know the reasons why I'm being wagoned, except that apparently you found my predecessor scummy.

Viomi died from Rustlung Disease Night 7, he was Corporal Michael Barrick ( Vanilla Townie ) of the COG

That game is a bit odd and I didn't go into much depth on my predecessor at all because I actually never read that game...

Erm, scigatt and Uber are two different people. I really don't give a flying fuck that they're the same role, there is one thing you can't defend in this game, and that's the person you replaced. I'm not going to be a jackass and judge him based on his predecessor, because I hate it when people do that to me.

I hate you people. I don't know what the guy who had the same role as me was thinking :L

I had another game I was going to quote here that showed me explicitly going over what my predecessor did and whatnot and then getting lynched for amish and flipping town, but it was back in 2011 (2012?) before the giant wipe, so that game doesn't exist anymore for me to quote from :/

[Viomi]

For those who don't know it:

Amished Tell

Hm hm, what's this we have here?

Also a case made on my predecessor is useless to me, I can't defend against stuff he did.

Oh and I have three people voting me, why would I be desperately trying to find something to defend myself against? I honestly don't know the reasons why I'm being wagoned, except that apparently you found my predecessor scummy.

Viomi died from Rustlung Disease Night 7, he was Corporal Michael Barrick ( Vanilla Townie ) of the COG

That game is a bit odd and I didn't go into much depth on my predecessor at all because I actually never read that game...

Erm, scigatt and Uber are two different people. I really don't give a flying fuck that they're the same role, there is one thing you can't defend in this game, and that's the person you replaced. I'm not going to be a jackass and judge him based on his predecessor, because I hate it when people do that to me.

I hate you people. I don't know what the guy who had the same role as me was thinking :L

I had another game I was going to quote here that showed me explicitly going over what my predecessor did and whatnot and then getting lynched for amish and flipping town, but it was back in 2011 (2012?) before the giant wipe, so that game doesn't exist anymore for me to quote from :/

Fuck, switched to alt for old games and slipped. #fail