In post 1915, T S O wrote:it's so coincidental that viking claims he was Roleblocked just when the Scum Roleblocker happens to die and it feels disgusting and off.
Your reads are really opportunistic.
In post 1915, T S O wrote:it's so coincidental that viking claims he was Roleblocked just when the Scum Roleblocker happens to die and it feels disgusting and off.
In post 1910, T S O wrote:If this is genuine, cool, out with it. If this is some sort of snap reaction to misreading me in Masquerade, my tolerance will be 0.
Thanks.
In post 1915, T S O wrote:It makes a kind of sense that vikingfan didn't get a result because pisskop RB'd him, but it's so coincidental that viking claims he was Roleblocked just when the Scum Roleblocker happens to die and it feels disgusting and off.
In post 1920, T S O wrote:In post 1918, Shinobi wrote:In post 1915, T S O wrote:It makes a kind of sense that vikingfan didn't get a result because pisskop RB'd him, but it's so coincidental that viking claims he was Roleblocked just when the Scum Roleblocker happens to die and it feels disgusting and off.
Sure bud.
Unfortunately, since there's a confirmed roleblocker in the setup, we're not lynching the cop claim based on things feeling "disgusting and off."
Sure bud, that's why I'm not voting for vikingfan.
In post 1929, goodmorning wrote:In post 1910, T S O wrote:If this is genuine, cool, out with it. If this is some sort of snap reaction to misreading me in Masquerade, my tolerance will be 0.
Thanks.
It's nothing to do with Masquerade. I don't assume people are Scum just because they were last time and I'm offended that you think so little of me.
In post 1929, goodmorning wrote:p-edit: I think I like this Ellie person.
In post 1931, T S O wrote:In post 1929, goodmorning wrote:It's nothing to do with Masquerade. I don't assume people are Scum just because they were last time and I'm offended that you think so little of me.
Don't get offended, gm, I think a lot of you, but the fact is your scumread on me seems completely unfounded, as does your immediate confidence in it, and short of Masquerade I can literally find 0 reason why this would at all be the case.
In post 1929, goodmorning wrote:p-edit: I think I like this Ellie person.
In post 1933, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Read this again: no matter what ika says,players are never told if they are protected in normal games on this site. vikingfan lied. Why would he lie about being protected? He is insecure about how his survival looks and tried to compensate for it by fabricating an explanation for it. He made a mistake in site meta.
He needs to be quicklynched ASAP.
In post 1930, T S O wrote:I am trying to understand where this notion of me treating him like "confscum" came from - it's certainly not at all apparent to me. I said he could be confscum -if- certain meta I haven't read yet backs one conclusion up - did you misread that post? Because that's everything I posted in relation to being confscum, so I don't see what other conclusion I could reach.
I think if I was trying to call him confscum I would have voted him - it's my usual procedure to follow in those cases.
In post 1747, T S O wrote:Anywayyy I hope Klingon's scumflip will help bolster her read
In post 1936, vikingfan wrote:Someone care to point me in the direction where it says the mod can't tell a player they were protected? If it's really a rule, ika did a pretty good job of screwing the town over.
In post 1941, vikingfan wrote:Ika, can you confirm that in this game, you tell people that they are saved? Otherwise it's going to screw not only me over but future people who are saved as well.
In post 1900, ika wrote:In post 1895, elusive wrote:
@ika, What happens if a player is murdered and healed, are they still able to use their action? What information do they get if any?
A player being healed would not stop them from acting.
If they get feedback or not is dependent on mod and role card wordings.
In post 1884, vikingfan wrote:I'm surprised ika didn't list it here but I was attacked last night and left for dead but was saved (I'm guessing by boon). I'm not sure if it was a result of being saved or not but I didn't get a result, I had investigated Shinobi. otherwise, if my getting attacked didn't stop the result, then I'm guessing pisskop did.
In post 1875, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Sorry, I realized during the night that I had mixed up my role pms with another game. I'm unfortunately a VT. My bad...
In post 1877, dragonspawn wrote:So a vigilante or serial killer killed our first scum. Good job.
Going to check out some iso posts
In post 1884, vikingfan wrote:I'm surprised ika didn't list it here butI was attacked last night and left for dead but was saved (I'm guessing by boon). I'm not sure if it was a result of being saved or not but I didn't get a result, I had investigated Shinobi. otherwise, if my getting attacked didn't stop the result, then I'm guessing pisskop did.
In post 1943, SilverWolf wrote:This is the only thing keeping me from voting VF right now.
In post 1944, goodmorning wrote:From the Doctor page: "While this is highly frowned upon at mafiascum.net, some moderators will tell players that they were saved from death via a form of protection (i.e. Doctors)."
In post 1947, goodmorning wrote:Actually it's the not-getting-a-result-at-all that I find the most implausible part of this story. Usually blocked Cops will get back "No Result" at least.