In post 2670, Ozgin wrote:The concept of a Freudian slip that isn't just a linguistics error. I'm just utterly fascinated by people who accidentally show their true intentions without even realizing it. Not saying that's what she did, but recognizing the possibility is just interesting to me personally. However, Kitz pretty much debunked my Freudian slip theory.
In post 2674, Ellie wrote:In post 2670, Ozgin wrote:2) But is it really crazy to be so sure of something that you'd bet your life on it? Granted, it's not your real life, but there are some things I'd be willing to bet my life on (e.g. I bet my life that I can go outside and take a picture of a handful of snow and post it because winter sucks on the east coast).
Do you have any beliefs about this game that you would bet your game life on? I was talking about some other behavior from ABR that appears to stretch the boundaries of sanity.
Ellie wrote:In post 2670, Ozgin wrote:The concept of a Freudian slip that isn't just a linguistics error. I'm just utterly fascinated by people who accidentally show their true intentions without even realizing it. Not saying that's what she did, but recognizing the possibility is just interesting to me personally. However, Kitz pretty much debunked my Freudian slip theory.
That was me not elusive.
In post 2673, Ozgin wrote:Fair enough, I can't necessarily argue with you if you claim you know her meta very well and she has confirmed that. But what about your posts saying things like "It's impossible to lynch her" etc., you almost hinted at her being invincible. Why is that?
In post 2624, elusive wrote:ABR, if VF flips town cop are you willing to be the quick lynch next day? I don't mean like arbitrary "saying it for the sake of saying it," I mean really since you seem 100% sure and unless you were town cop or actually a PR you're insistence is to be believed why.
Also, your meta is that you are ruthless, manipulative and will say anything which is what I remember from the first game so pot kettle. And you tried to kill me town too.
In post 2628, Wake1 wrote:So I leave to take a shower for about ten minutes, and 2.5 pages apparently fly by.
Wake me up when we have something important to talk about.
In post 2614, Albert B. Rampage wrote:TSO, I promise you we will get back to Ellie in the future, can we please lynch vikingfan today?
In post 2608, vikingfan wrote:Do you not want him gone because of mod issues or do you not want him lynched?
I've very reasonably laid out why I think you're scum in a very non-personal way. I've been very specific about everything I said, and you should have given me the benefit of the doubt as town instead of latching on to me with OMGUS. I believe nothing you say anymore. I think he's town. Members of the vote block are manipulating other members of it to vote for him, and you are, and that makes him likely innocent.
In post 2612, elusive wrote:ABR, ika actually linked to something Doctor related. What did you glean from that?
Are you claiming loud doctor?
In post 2611, MathBlade wrote:@ABR -- I think goodmorning, kitz, mathblade, elusive and ellie all of those people are town. Hence not voting for them. I have said this before as well. When I flip town you'll see those are reads.
Yes, it's a vote block. Make no mistake about it. I don't trust it. And I am gathering my support around me to break it up by accurately singling out the scum in it.
In post 2585, ika wrote:
In post 2565, FakedBlogger wrote:Oh so your definition of maniacal behavior is leaving voice recordings. I thought was assuming some sort of intelligence but guess not. Oh and hammering someone who could be scum is also much more maniacal than waiting for an overturn on what I know for a fact to be town. Right. Carry on dummy
In post 2524, Aeronaut wrote:In post 2521, elusive wrote:In post 2505, Aeronaut wrote:Wouldn't there be three kills then?
Also, Pisskop's role didn't specify a color or anything.
What was this about? It did specify a color (red) as well as alignment (mafia).
No, I think if it were multiball it'd literally say "Red Mafia" or "Blue Mafia" or something.
In post 2512, Cheetory6 wrote:More I look at her interactions with pisskop on D1, the more it looks like scum distancing to me.
She makes a vocal point to direct everyone's attention to pisskop being scummy multiple times, but doesn't vote for him initially. It feels more like posturing than anything.
Ellie wrote:pisskop, you seem like you want people to think you're town, but are actually scum.
Ellie wrote:This is the measured response of scum trying to look unruffled.
I just feel like the manner in which she's pushing pisskop feels fake and seems very intentionally loud. Like "LOOK AT HOW NOT SCUMMATES PISSKOP AND I ARE".
Look at the difference between her scumread on pisskop and her reads on literally everyone else now. It really comes across like she doesn't know how to come across as strongly with a fake scumread on someone when it was comparatively much easier to do it on D1 when it was just on someone that she knows is scum.
The elusive defense on flip stuff is weird and while weird isn't necessarily scummy, her inability to explain exactly what she was trying to do/being dodgy is general feels pretty off.
VOTE: Ellie
I like this vote. c:
In post 2519, elusive wrote:What actual point doesn't make sense TSO or Cheetory? Point to it and I'll explain nice and slow. Oh and cheetory does being voted motivate you to vote?
Based on ISOing and looking at the votals:
Aeronaut is probably scum (oh and great question about alignment of Pisskop, you're really reading carefully and that almost seemed like a town slip except it was such BS since his role aka "Mafia" was mentioned in the death scene). Boo hoo. VOTE: Aeronaut
TSO you led or co-led a wagon on town yesterday over stupid reasons, no one cares what you think.
If any scum distancing was going on it was between pisskop and dragonspawn. Or are you not reading the effing ISO, cheetory?
Since I'm looking at everything ABR says about VF with a shaker of salt, why doesn't someone less "boy who cried wolf" explain what the mechanics argument is in like 2-3 sentences maximum? He's definitely not on a faction with pisskop so therefore that must mean that VF, if he isn't the cop which I still assume he is based on just the level of derpage, would mean you think there are two scum factions. I'm almost even okay with an ABR lynch over the other two.
Based on what I know of Ellie and her play, she is not scum. People piling on her are the scum or idiot town and the wagons that are being resisted are Much More Likely Scum.
This is not her scum game and I suggest you get off this fucking wagon before I stop being such a sweet little cupcake.
In post 2679, Ellie wrote:Poor choice - I was tied for votes with vikingfan, you totally could have lynched me ABR. Don't give up so easily!
In post 2684, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 2565, FakedBlogger wrote:Oh so your definition of maniacal behavior is leaving voice recordings. I thought was assuming some sort of intelligence but guess not. Oh and hammering someone who could be scum is also much more maniacal than waiting for an overturn on what I know for a fact to be town. Right. Carry on dummy
Manic behavior is what you are doing right now and have been doing for days - BS one liners without any indication that you actually want to hunt scum. The last post that had any real reasoning behind it past 'fuck it' was 25 pages ago. Then, when addressed, your only real answer is 'no you' or 'no I am not' playground antics. The question keeps coming up as to why no one is voting you when there are a lot of people reading you as scum. Well, good question.
VOTE: NakedJogger
Lack of content, a hammer without intent and no real scum hunting and outright refusal to explain why what you are doing is pro-town.
In post 2688, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Vikingfan slipped when he said the mod told him a doctor saved him.
The vf ship is here and ready to take your tickets. Let's stop talking about doing this and do this.
In post 2663, Ellie wrote:In post 2658, FakedBlogger wrote:@Ellie That would spare me quite a lot of enjoyment. Also, don't defend stupidity; People who call me scum have to come up with reasons to do so before I have to do anything, not the other way around. And I believe I've already explained it to none other than elusive who has asked me that same question twice ever since despite.
The reason you needed to hammer is because enough people thought you were scummy to have a good chance of lynching you. That was before the hammer. Then rather than, say, explain your reads, you acted in an extremely survivalistic manner. It is not surprising people think you are scummy.
