In post 3023, Ellie wrote:In post 3013, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're not the deputy, are you? Who's the one lying here, really?
No really. What does this mean?
What do you mean what do I mean? Didn't you read 3000?
In post 3023, Ellie wrote:In post 3013, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're not the deputy, are you? Who's the one lying here, really?
No really. What does this mean?
In post 3021, Ellie wrote:In post 3018, elusive wrote:SilverWolf, I have seen very passionate and convincing scum weasel their way out of a sure lynch and get townies killed. Is there anything else that belies you to believe that?
Titus, right?
vikingfan wrote:ABR is scum.
vikingfan wrote:For the love of all that is good and holy, lynch ABR, the lying scum.
In post 3018, elusive wrote:SilverWolf, I have seen very passionate and convincing scum weasel their way out of a sure lynch and get townies killed. Is there anything else that belies you to believe that?
In post 3027, Ozgin wrote:Ellie, even if you're 100% convinced of ABR being scum, what are your thoughts on vf's lazy, half-assed defending of himself? He's basically letting you fight for him. Don't you think his lack of conviction is a little strange? ABR is basically claiming to be exactly what vf says his slot is, and he's barely even putting up his dukes. Is that not odd?
In post 1383, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Once someone has unequivocally claimed, you pretend like they are what they are in hopes that the NKs will clear things up. The way you're trying to throw some shade on viking's claim is very anti-town.
In post 1384, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You pretend to believe that they are what they say they are*
In post 3035, Ellie wrote:In post 1383, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Once someone has unequivocally claimed, you pretend like they are what they are in hopes that the NKs will clear things up. The way you're trying to throw some shade on viking's claim is very anti-town.
In post 1384, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You pretend to believe that they are what they say they are*
Please explain these posts.
In post 3021, Ellie wrote:In post 3018, elusive wrote:SilverWolf, I have seen very passionate and convincing scum weasel their way out of a sure lynch and get townies killed. Is there anything else that belies you to believe that?
Titus, right?
In post 1388, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 1386, MathBlade wrote:And in this case when it is so obvious they are the most anti town cop on the planet you call them on their shit. Make them play protown or be lynched for the scum they likely are. Claiming cop is not a free pass ever.
I do not respect your opinion because it isn't backed by a vote.
You can do one of two things:
-pretend you believe a claim
-try to get them lynched anyway
You can't throw suspicion on them while getting someone else lynched, because then if they survive it's due to the WIFOM that you yourself created.
In post 1707, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 1695, MathBlade wrote:Exactly. So VF claiming cop while doing nothing cop like, discussing mechanics of who to investigate instead of hunting.
You know, Math, I agree with you, but haven't we talked about this kind of speculation before? I don't see why we need to keep harping on it. You won't die tonight. You can bring it up tomorrow.
In post 3043, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm a far better respected player than Titus and have many more victories and successful plans carried out than her.
In post 3048, Ellie wrote:Okay, I'll stop defending vikingfan. With a counterclaim on the table, it makes sense to lynch him or ABR today, and it doesn't really matterthatmuch which we choose.