Mini 469 - Self Guided Mafia - Game Over.
-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
No, we haven't. The scum haven't learned anything more than the first few posts, and I'm following up a scum trail that could lead to important info."This should be an absolute car crash, but let's try it." - CDB
"did you get ces to look disgusted by their offer? i thought that might work" - Patrick
Cracking Idea Mafia-
-
dylan41985 Goon
-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
-
-
creampuffeater Virgin
- Virgin
- Virgin
- Posts: 763
- Joined: December 12, 2005
- Location: San Francisco Cali
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
schismatized Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 490
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: The frying pan.
-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
-
-
Jenter Brolincani Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 770
- Joined: May 4, 2007
- Location: Heaven, Cloud Cuckoo Land
I'm guessing that PM was the result of someone's role...ShowWho dares, dies.
No access on thursdays.
...this would be much simpler for me if one of you could stop making sense and act like scum. - Elmo
...So the only scum is a player with no vote, no NK and doesn't exist? - Rogue Shenanigans-
-
PJ. Hell in a Cell
- Hell in a Cell
- Hell in a Cell
- Posts: 4601
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: somewhere better than you =*
-
-
creampuffeater Virgin
- Virgin
- Virgin
- Posts: 763
- Joined: December 12, 2005
- Location: San Francisco Cali
-
-
schismatized Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 490
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: The frying pan.
-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
Seriously, I think Xdaemno needs to go.Xdaamno wrote:I believe another helpful way out of this for me is to claim what I submitted. NK Bomb; (And possible lynch bomb; I submitted this but it was probably overpowered, not sure) This is clearly a pro-town role, so if anyone has this, probably don't roleclaim but know that I'm not scum.
unvote, vote Xdaemno
Back to him."Lets save water...take a shower with me."-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
Looks like a very stupid vote.Xdaamno wrote:Vote: rajrhcpfreak
Bad arguments.
Basically repeats what other people say.Xdaamno wrote:Heh. I find it funny those under attack label things such as 'Piggy's votes were pressure' completely stupid or scummy. I think not realising that he wasn't actually trying to lynch someone (Because there's only two conceivable reasons for a vote, in normal play: Wanting to lynch or applying pressure) is the stupid/scummy part.
Xdaamno wrote:For the record. rajrhcpfreak is my lynch for today, if I was forced to choose.
none of this is helpful.Xdaamno wrote:Mmkay. That's either PRed townie or sympathy scum. Probably the former, IMO.
Horrible post. Talks like speedlynching actually could happen.Xdaamno wrote:rajrhcpfreak wrote:
i said that theos observations were a good catch.Jenter Brolincani wrote:Unvote, vote rajrhcpfreak
Right, he votes Ms piggy for hopping, when I do the same and am persuaded to think differently by Xdaammo he calls it scummy and a 'good catch'. Logical ****.
He then blatantly tries to get me speedlynched. Saying someone, anyone, is the play for today on PAGE 3 is ridiculous.
Basically these are my reasons for thinking he is scum.
speed lynch? ha. you wont be speed lynched unless you refuse to claim. my statements saying "your the play" is just to convince people to bandwagon you to a claim. then we can decide if your lying.
Eh, where do I start. He won't be speed lynched if or if not he refuses to claim; that's loaded. Whether he's scum or he has a role that shouldn't be claimed strategically, I'd still not speedlynch him, since we can't distinguish between the two.
page 3? well, i represent a growing sentiment on this site that doesn't fool around, a group on this site that enjoys fast games. and why shouldn't we bandwagon you to claim if we've found scum on page 3.
Also crap logic. Bandwagoning to claim is the alleged way of finding out whether he's scum. You can't bandwagon him for being scum if you haven't even got the claim yet.
personally i don't want to sit around masturbating in my own words for twenty pages waiting for scum to trip me up and convince the town to lynch me on a stupid technicality. your actions today, following the front runners and agreeing with them comes out pretty scummy. and your tag team effort with Xdaammo is intriguing. i want to say its on the scummy side but ill wait to judge it after we deal with you.
And this is the worst part. It seems, in every game where I trust someone, it gets pounced on (And always by scum so far). Is itreallythat hard to believe I find a player with good points trustworthy instead of me (allegedly) latching onto my scum partner for help and hoping nobody would notice? An annoying part of mafia scum it's people's trust of well-known conscious scum tells. Since they're conscious and well-known forms an oxymoron; if they're well known scum tells, they wouldn't consciously be performed.
That is scummy in my opinion, for reasons.Xdaamno wrote:-_-'
It was alotmore helpful telling us, anyway, thanks. The problem is you've just made a massive scum pairing between me and you if you get lynched, because you're either scum or telling the truth XD
Instead of trying to defend against the votes on you, you say other people are making terrible points.Xdaamno wrote:
I'm actually looking at the people attacking me now mainly because it's so sheepish and ridiculous. JDodge has given a terrible point, and others have latched on without any additional reasons.
Your defense against the posts were just saying that you fully presented and defended the arguments, which was completely bull.
More and more .Just silly.Xdaamno wrote:
Have you actually read most of my posts? Before I came under attack I was easily one of the most helpful players. I looked into almost every point and applied pressure to loads of people to guage reactions. Seriously, go back and check.what we should be looking at is helpfullness to the town, and Xdaamno isnt helpfull"Lets save water...take a shower with me."-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
[/quote]Xdaamno wrote:
And this is the worst part. It seems, in every game where I trust someone, it gets pounced on (And always by scum so far). Is itreallythat hard to believe I find a player with good points trustworthy instead of me (allegedly) latching onto my scum partner for help and hoping nobody would notice? An annoying part of mafia scum it's people's trust of well-known conscious scum tells. Since they're conscious and well-known forms an oxymoron; if they're well known scum tells, they wouldn't consciously be performed.
EBWOP: Uses metagaming about how he gets pounced on. Oops quoted wrong part."Lets save water...take a shower with me."-
-
Tarhalindur Mod Screw
- Mod Screw
- Mod Screw
- Posts: 3925
- Joined: June 7, 2007
- Location: Error 404: Location not found
-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
That's not a good reason, and besides, you can't really use an ongoing game well to determine whether a person is scum or not. I just think that's quite a fishy, or shall I say, questionable reason, to go after someone.
Also, the fact that we are on Day 1, and we have had a load of one=liners, and that stuff about how we all received a PM about someone, that lone reason backed up by an ongoing game where he was scum wouldn't be enough."Lets save water...take a shower with me."-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
I just looked back, and you haven't posted in several days, but the last post said that you were going to take a closer look at Jenter. How come it's suddenly Panzer now, after you said Jenter's playing was a bit off?Tarhalindur wrote: I need to look over Jenter - something about how he's playing seems off. Unfortunately, I'm short on time right now (check V/LA), soFoS: Jenter Brolincaniuntil I can actually do a reread.
Seriously, that just doesn't fit my belly talk."Lets save water...take a shower with me."-
-
PJ. Hell in a Cell
- Hell in a Cell
- Hell in a Cell
- Posts: 4601
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: somewhere better than you =*
-
-
theopor_COD PhD'oh!
- PhD'oh!
- PhD'oh!
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: January 14, 2007
-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
Ms Piggy wrote:
Looks like a very stupid vote.Xdaamno wrote:Vote: rajrhcpfreak
Bad arguments.
For what reason? You've voted without much reasoning at all too, you know, so I could easily say the same about you.
Basically repeats what other people say.Xdaamno wrote:Heh. I find it funny those under attack label things such as 'Piggy's votes were pressure' completely stupid or scummy. I think not realising that he wasn't actually trying to lynch someone (Because there's only two conceivable reasons for a vote, in normal play: Wanting to lynch or applying pressure) is the stupid/scummy part.
Complete bs. I was the first person to say that.
Xdaamno wrote:For the record. rajrhcpfreak is my lynch for today, if I was forced to choose.
none of this is helpful.Xdaamno wrote:Mmkay. That's either PRed townie or sympathy scum. Probably the former, IMO.
I know, it's practically nomrla conversation. Once again, I could look back at your posts and find more than two where you haven't made a massivly strong argument.
Horrible post. Talks like speedlynching actually could happen.Xdaamno wrote:rajrhcpfreak wrote:
i said that theos observations were a good catch.Jenter Brolincani wrote:Unvote, vote rajrhcpfreak
Right, he votes Ms piggy for hopping, when I do the same and am persuaded to think differently by Xdaammo he calls it scummy and a 'good catch'. Logical ****.
He then blatantly tries to get me speedlynched. Saying someone, anyone, is the play for today on PAGE 3 is ridiculous.
Basically these are my reasons for thinking he is scum.
speed lynch? ha. you wont be speed lynched unless you refuse to claim. my statements saying "your the play" is just to convince people to bandwagon you to a claim. then we can decide if your lying.
Eh, where do I start. He won't be speed lynched if or if not he refuses to claim; that's loaded. Whether he's scum or he has a role that shouldn't be claimed strategically, I'd still not speedlynch him, since we can't distinguish between the two.
page 3? well, i represent a growing sentiment on this site that doesn't fool around, a group on this site that enjoys fast games. and why shouldn't we bandwagon you to claim if we've found scum on page 3.
Also crap logic. Bandwagoning to claim is the alleged way of finding out whether he's scum. You can't bandwagon him for being scum if you haven't even got the claim yet.
personally i don't want to sit around masturbating in my own words for twenty pages waiting for scum to trip me up and convince the town to lynch me on a stupid technicality. your actions today, following the front runners and agreeing with them comes out pretty scummy. and your tag team effort with Xdaammo is intriguing. i want to say its on the scummy side but ill wait to judge it after we deal with you.
And this is the worst part. It seems, in every game where I trust someone, it gets pounced on (And always by scum so far). Is itreallythat hard to believe I find a player with good points trustworthy instead of me (allegedly) latching onto my scum partner for help and hoping nobody would notice? An annoying part of mafia scum it's people's trust of well-known conscious scum tells. Since they're conscious and well-known forms an oxymoron; if they're well known scum tells, they wouldn't consciously be performed.
Got me mixed up with rajhgifck here? My parts are in bold. I don't mention speedlynching once it that paragraph.
That is scummy in my opinion, for reasons.Xdaamno wrote:-_-'
It was alotmore helpful telling us, anyway, thanks. The problem is you've just made a massive scum pairing between me and you if you get lynched, because you're either scum or telling the truth XD
For reasons you decide not to tell us? I meant if anyone would look back, they'd see a massive unitentional scum pairing. Me stating this would help me in futurew if anyone brought it up. 'For reasons' is just stupid.
Instead of trying to defend against the votes on you, you say other people are making terrible points.Xdaamno wrote:
I'm actually looking at the people attacking me now mainly because it's so sheepish and ridiculous. JDodge has given a terrible point, and others have latched on without any additional reasons.
Your defense against the posts were just saying that you fully presented and defended the arguments, which was completely bull.
Uhm, NO to your first paragraph. What I did was defend JDodge's point,and thensay this. I didn't defend it twice because that wouyld be unnesecary. This is grasping.
When I sat I've fully defended something, it's because I already have in the past, not because I'm doing it in the current post. You've taken a single post that wasn't even a defense and accused it for lack of a defense when I already had made one.
More and more. Just silly.Xdaamno wrote:
Have you actually read most of my posts? Before I came under attack I was easily one of the most helpful players. I looked into almost every point and applied pressure to loads of people to guage reactions. Seriously, go back and check.what we should be looking at is helpfullness to the town, and Xdaamno isnt helpfull
My god, the stupidity of anyone who believes this stuff is horrible. 'More and more, Just Silly'? What kind of attack is that? There hasn't beena single peice of undeniable evidence against me, and I've just easily knocked down every single argument in this whole post. If you still believe I'm scum and you're town, you shoulda joined a newbie game instead-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
I really don't like your responses. You either said complete bull about how that's all not true, or said everything was stupid and how others are horrible if they want to vote you and think you're scum. About that Raj part, notice in Post 163, that I used EBDWOP to clarify that part.
Confirm vote: Xdaemno"Lets save water...take a shower with me."-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
Uhm, no I didn't, I presented completely valid arguments. How about you actually read them? Almost every single one of your posts has attempted to lynch me, but not actually put any good points across.I really don't like your responses. You either said complete bull about how that's all not true, or said everything was stupid and how others are horrible if they want to vote you and think you're scum."This should be an absolute car crash, but let's try it." - CDB
"did you get ces to look disgusted by their offer? i thought that might work" - Patrick
Cracking Idea Mafia-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
EBWOP: For clarification, I did say things were bull and not true, but I had sown that into my actual arguments. You make it sound like I was just denying things rather than proving them wrong."This should be an absolute car crash, but let's try it." - CDB
"did you get ces to look disgusted by their offer? i thought that might work" - Patrick
Cracking Idea Mafia-
-
rajrhcpfreak I puzzle myself sometimes
- I puzzle myself sometimes
- I puzzle myself sometimes
- Posts: 2915
- Joined: December 28, 2004
- Location: Orlando, FL
fyi i think i submitted a roleblocker too.
Xdaamno is an interesting subject. Around page 4 or 5 i started to believe him thinking that in his eyes i am very wrong about him and maybe Jenter is just scum.
But why is he trying to protect him so much by going after me?
I never directly voted for him. ive mentioned my suspicions of him and hes on my scumdar.
this was my first post mentioning him was #68 and it was just entertaining the idea of the possibility of him and Jenter being a scum pair:
rajrhcpfreak wrote:(jenter's) actions today, following the front runners and agreeing with them comes out pretty scummy. and your tag team effort with Xdaammo is intriguing. i want to say its on the scummy side but ill wait to judge it after we deal with you.
After looking back i think i'm ready tounvote
vote: Xdaamno
your right Xdaamno, you said that theres no arguments in that one post. i was only stating my observations. which now its even more apparent that you two are playing as a team.Showhttp://kysurvivorfreak.blogspot.com/
raj's to do list:
Zulu Mafia : TBA
No Night Mafia : TBA
Epic Mafia : TBA
Record: 22-33-2
2005: 10-13-2
2006: 5-10
2007: 1-2
2008: 2-4
2009: 3-0
2010: 2-4
2011-2017: retired-
-
Ms Piggy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 404
- Joined: June 23, 2007
The thing that is bothering me about Xdaemno is his tone, as well as his actions, but more the tone. He also discounts anything you/I say against him by not defending, but saying how bad it is. At least, that's how it seems.Xdaamno wrote:
Uhm, no I didn't, I presented completely valid arguments. How about you actually read them? Almost every single one of your posts has attempted to lynch me, but not actually put any good points across.I really don't like your responses. You either said complete bull about how that's all not true, or said everything was stupid and how others are horrible if they want to vote you and think you're scum.
Especially that earlier post, the really long one."Lets save water...take a shower with me."
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.