In post 1720, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Huh...so you are the only one actually helping the town right??
No - but I do think I stand in an unhappily tiny circle.
In post 1720, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:This is a silly overstatement as I am pushing for a NS lynch as you are pushing for a Anti lynch.
Since (with two votes) you sit at the third largest wagon, I will agree you are doing some work.
I would also note that I didn't call out your vote as terrible...almost as though you're complaining about me making an attack I didn't make.
In post 1720, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote: You are acting like an egomaniac
Possibly so.
In post 1720, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:what is a suxxor. never heard of tat term
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=suxxor
In post 1720, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:What is worse about Antis dodges as oppose to NS???
Not much, I consider them very even, personally. What is worse about NS's compared to Anti? Anti has the larger wagon.
Wanna vote Anti?
In post 1722, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:What do you mean we need a claim?
I mean I believe that the best thing for this game is to have (already) got someone to L-1 and demanded a claim.
In post 1722, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:are you saying we need to force a claim by quick wagon?????
I'm pretty sure our chances for "quick" went away about a week ago - but, yes, I *am* saying we should get a claim.
In post 1724, copper223 wrote:In post 1723, mnemonicdevice wrote:So btw all, the VC apparently don't include a majority of the votes that actually happened. I guess that analysis was useless.
So if I were to use VC's only I would get your list?
This looks worthy of a double check.