In post 8120, ZeL1nK2 wrote:(1) The claim itself wasn't "townish" unless you were already reading mastin as town. Other people who read the claim were either questioning it or saying it looked suspicious, and they weren't even hard scum-reading mastin. It makes me wonder why you were pushing so hard for mastin's lynch/claim if all it took was a relatively weak claim that is probably mostly true regardless of mastin's alignment.
So you think that scum got a Bee Tracker.
Right.
This was the point where I realised, once again, you have no idea what you're talking about whatsoever.
In post 8120, ZeL1nK2 wrote:(2) It's not, though. You'd been scum reading my slot since D1. Only today do you turn around and call it town. Why?
#7566 and
#7572 indicate I'm apparently too dumb to be scum. I mean if my case on you is so bad and I'm misrepresenting what you're saying, why is it town? Why couldn't I theoretically do this as scum? Do scum just never make cases?
I love how you start running away from your own lies - in your last post this was "hard scumreading", now it's just gone back to "scumreading". There's a big difference, but lying or exaggerating to make your points seem better is a trademark of your play, after all.
But, yeah, it's possible for my reads to change, especially in the face of certain types of play, and your derpy little tunnel is all that. My scumread on TiphaineDeath was never particularly strong - other than push for him as a deadline lynch one time, I don't remember saying much.
In post 8120, ZeL1nK2 wrote:(3) As I pointed out in #8111, the case you wrote on pikari got absolutely demolished. Like, to the point where the exact scenario you wrote would happen if pikari was town (in
#7836) actually
DID
happen in this game. Exactly what you said would happen if he was town. You'd know this if your case wasn't baloney. But you didn't even fact-check. All of your other points aren't even valid points. The only one that would actually have any merit in a case is if it's true that pikari lied about reads. What reads did he lie about? You still haven't answered this.
I'm going back to my comfortable refrain: if you were actually reading the game, rather than skimming it, you'd see that I have said many, many, many times that he's lied, multiple times, about his read on me. You'd know this if you were reading the game. Which you're not.
In post 8120, ZeL1nK2 wrote:(4) No, it's not. It's called providing no content and pretending you are providing content. You haven't stated a reason for thinking TWIE is scum. All you've done is suggest that people town-reading him don't have rock-solid reasons for doing this. That's not scum hunting. That's poking holes in town cases while providing no scum case. You don't have a scum case on TWIE. You haven't given any reasons to believe TWIE is scum. All you've done for pages and pages is say people shouldn't be town-reading him.
Yes, yes, throw the "you're producing no content" at me some more, ZeL1nk. No-one here is inexperienced enough to fall for it.
It's pretty hilarious, really, that the sum of your recent content has been tunnelling me and literally doing nothing else bar some attempts at theory, while I've been busy debunking ill-founded townreads, and apparently
I'm
the one who's not producing content - but continue with that line, I'm sure MS will comfort you into thinking you're right at some stage.
In post 8120, ZeL1nK2 wrote:If you legitimately don't understand the difference between giving reasons for someone being scum and poking holes in a town case, then might I suggest you visit
this thread, to brush up on your mafia knowledge.
That's not a bad idea - it's been a while since I had some fun IC'ing.