In post 4743, goodmorning wrote:@Ozgin: Have you been fighting with Shinobi?
No. I had a slight conflict with Shinobi but it was in a lousy bit of rage.
In post 4712, Kitz wrote:Remember what happened the 4 other lynches? "Me or another".
ERMAGUD IT REPETZ
This is 100% accurate to my feelings for the TSO/Marquis fight. However, I'm pretty convinced that TSO is serial killer.
Spoiler: TSO is the SK
In post 4806, Aeronaut wrote:Oh, you claimed an unverifiable role which happens to have the same powers as a Serial Killer?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........
So this post made me question whether or no TSO could actually be the SK or not, and whether or not his vig claim is legitimate. Because it is perfectly valid to debate whether or not a player is a Town Vigilante or a Serial Killer trying to leash himself as a vigilante.
In post 4848, T S O wrote:In post 3766, T S O wrote:Actually, the point about the vig is completely relevant - our vig had "presumably" shot scum on night 1, which shows they are a competent player and shouldn't have to be limited to doing the policy work of the town.
The MathBlade kill was also optimal last night, because ABR did not retract his claim - thus, the vig has yet to really slip up, reinforcing my point.
Interesting how he chooses a quote that happened way after the next four in this "wall of crumbs." This isn't a crumb, this is him saying "I'm about to claim vigilante because I've been setting this up for a while."
In post 3420, T S O wrote:if MathBlade is Vengeful then why did ABR track her to Ellie? How has Math concluded that ABR has gone from 100% scum to town?
This has absolutely nothing to do with vigilantes. Seriously, how on earth is this a crumb to anything? It's just drawing unnecessary attention to MathBlade. Maybe this is where you started to get the bright idea to set up these next few quotes...
In post 3459, T S O wrote:Can we all just talk about MathBlade's what-the-fuck stance for a bit?
This is in no way a crumb for a vig claim. This is, in my opinion, his SK-slip in this series of quotes. He thinks this is a crumb for him being vigilante because in 2 posts (next quote) he's going to set himself up to claim vig and shoot Math. However, this post, in and of itself, is just a gateway into attacking MathBlade/building town hate on MathBlade. This literally reads to me, "Can we all just start hating MathBlade so when I fakeclaim vigilante I won't get yelled at for killing her?
In post 3461, T S O wrote:In post 3450, Cheetory6 wrote:TSO you said you were townreading ABR a while ago.
Why are you voting him over Math if you think I'm right? :/.
Because either he dies from vig or lynch and the vig could do better than shooting him.
This is where he, very conveniently, is setting himself up to claim vig soon after. Notice how he doesn't even remotely acknowledge the likelihood of the scum team killing Math or even the SK.
In post 3468, T S O wrote:In post 3462, MathBlade wrote:In post 3458, T S O wrote:So, let's get this straight: ABR got a result last night, which wasn't you, as town, and has decided to lie yet again... ?
Yep However when I explain it plainly and you do but attack what is clear it is frustrating.
ABR even said so.
The vig could do better and shoot you as ABR is town.
The vig is never going to shoot me - it's likely the vig is going to shoot you. If I were the vig, I'd already have the action sent.
This quote just sounds like he's setting himself up to claim vig the next day or two. I mean, this is screaming "Hey look, the vig is going to shoot MathBlade tonight!" *Stabs MathBlade* "See look! I'm the vig, here's where I admitted it!" Also, note that this is just 7 posts after the last post he quoted, where he's conveniently doing the same kind of setting up for a vig claim.
Crumbs. Last one especially relevant.
This whole things feels like TSO is trying to set himself up at the vig very conveniently. I think it's just as likely that TSO is the SK, and planned on killing MathBlade and using that kill as a set-up to try to conf-town himself. I believe he picked MathBlade because she was generally disliked, so he would easily be able to give some bullshit excuse when he claims vigilante so he doesn't get too much friction for it (and thanks to Aeronaut, that plan isn't working).
In post 4928, T S O wrote:There were three kills in this game n1.
We have a Vig who shot scum n1.
I claimed the vig.
I showed my motivation for the n1 shot.
Ergo, I am town.
Just because you disagree with one of my shots, and you're retrospectively using that shot's townflip to argue your point, doesn't make me scum. It doesn't make me anywhere in the realm of scum. I have explained why I shot MathBlade. You disagree. Quite honestly, I couldn't give a fuck.
This is TSO getting really angry when his scheme to make MathBlade look like shit before his vig-claim set up isn't working. Also, there's nothing at all to say that you killing pisskop makes you town. You could have gotten lucky. Or, the real vig could have shot pisskop and you could have shot one of the other 2 people who died N1 and are just conveniently claiming that your shot was the one on the scum.
In post 4720, T S O wrote:Stop your fucking set-up spec. Even if you think you know it, speculating on it has no benefit to anyone if you are town.
If you're scum, keep on speculating.
Lastly, this is the quote that basically says "Nobody go into setup spec because you'll then in turn be questioning me and I don't like suspicion!" I normally would agree that setup-spec is a bad reason for a scum read or a sk-read, but at this stage of the game it gets a little silly to think there are actually this many PRs.