Mini #1647: Eine Kleine Nacht-Mord, Game Over
-
-
Untrod Tripod Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Posts: 11652
- Joined: September 1, 2003
-
-
petroleumjelly he/him/hisThirteenthly, ...he/him/his
- Thirteenthly, ...
- Thirteenthly, ...
- Posts: 6219
- Joined: November 27, 2005
- Pronoun: he/him/his
- Location: Tacoma, WA
Day Three Vote Count #3
Green Crayons – 1 – prawneater
TellTaleHeart – 1 – Green Crayons
With7alive it takes4lynch, and3to lynch at deadline. Deadline isApril 8, 2015 at 6:35 AM PST.
Not Voting - 6 - ChannelDelibird, Derangement, onion, TellTaleHeart, Untrod Tripod
Countdown: (expired on 2015-04-08 06:35:00)
ChannelDelibird has been prodded."Logic? I call that flapdoodle."-
-
onion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 303
- Joined: January 27, 2009
alright, time to do my part to unstall this shit, because stalling is anti-town.
Tripod, you want to lynch TTH? Both Llama and Equinox didn't like the guy either. Equinox, in 872, is (probably?) agreeing with Derangement's excellently formatted wicket cool boxes post 870. So i'm going to assume those reasons were Equinox's reasons. those reasons boil down to lurking and failing to scumhunt or answer questions, which pretty much just means lurking.
Llama was dead set on TTH, partially because of TTH refusing to answer questions, and partially because of lurking, and partially probably for other reasons but i can't tell because he sucked at explaining himself.
I'd like to add that TTH also voted for our confirmed townies an astounding 6 times, even more than you tripod! so there's that.
If you would be so kind tripod, please to agree or disagree with the above, and add a few reasons of your own if you have them.
-=-
@Prawn, dear prawn, your reasons for voting are not clear, hence my asking. your refusal to answer these sort of questions hurts the town. are you voting GC because you kinda disagreed with kinda half of his kinda cases against me? that's what 919 indicates at least, but it seems like you didn't disagree strongly enough to warrent a vote, and if you did, then why didn't you vote at the time? explain thyself.
-=-
wag now to tackle this GC drunken stuff with poor punctuation. your thing on Derangement has something going for it. i dislike Derangement's recent much more cautious testing of the waters than his previous full frontal logical scumhunting. i guess i don't really have a question for you. keep not lurking, yo.
@TTH and CBD: POST GOD DAMNIT-
-
Untrod Tripod Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Posts: 11652
- Joined: September 1, 2003
In post 952, onion wrote:Tripod, you want to lynch TTH? Both Llama and Equinox didn't like the guy either. Equinox, in 872, is (probably?) agreeing with Derangement's excellently formatted wicket cool boxes post 870. So i'm going to assume those reasons were Equinox's reasons. those reasons boil down to lurking and failing to scumhunt or answer questions, which pretty much just means lurking.
Llama was dead set on TTH, partially because of TTH refusing to answer questions, and partially because of lurking, and partially probably for other reasons but i can't tell because he sucked at explaining himself.
I'd like to add that TTH also voted for our confirmed townies an astounding 6 times, even more than you tripod! so there's that.
If you would be so kind tripod, please to agree or disagree with the above, and add a few reasons of your own if you have them.
...what exactly are you trying to say here?-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
I rather hoped that TTH and CDB would chime in, since their feedback would have been pretty usefulbeforeI fully voiced my thoughts in the thread.
So I waited.
Then prods and prodges happened and I waited some more.
I'm not willing to wait longer, so in the interest of moving things forward:
I'm scumreading Crayons and TTH, and have a disturbingly absent read on CDB.
The weird NK gave me pause, and made me want to doublecheck my reads, in case I could find something wrong about any of them.
And then Crayons voted TTH.
Because day 2 left TTH in a position where (even after Equinox was NK'd) she might very well still get lynched, I half-expected that if she is scum, her scum-buddy would try to push someone else, in hopes that maybe some non-TTH wagon would take the spotlight, and she could be saved.
While my initial gut feeling told me that this vote meant I was wrong about either GC or TTH, and this was a case of scum voting town, or town voting scum, now that I had some time to think about it, Icansee this as bussing:
Scum!GC first voted town!CDB, hoping to ease scum!TTH's life, just like I expected.
He then had some time to think, and found an even better alternative.
Bussing TTH bystartingthe wagon capitalizes on post-NK paranoia by being just the kind of move that distances the two of them, while also putting Crayons in the unique position of having plenty of time to later be persuaded to vote elsewhere without looking like he's vote-hopping.
With this possibility in mind, and provided things stay as they are, I'm willing to lynch:- Green Crayons - scumread;
- TellTaleHeart - scumread, lurking (while active in other threads);
- ChannelDelibird - lurking (while active in other threads, even afterhis prod was issued).
VOTE: TellTaleHeart
Please contribute.Your friendly neighbourhood Derangement, or Dee for short.
May contain traces of nuts.-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
-
-
Untrod Tripod Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Posts: 11652
- Joined: September 1, 2003
-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
In post 956, Untrod Tripod wrote:not gonna vote yet just in case, but consider my vote on TTH in spirit!
Is it okay if I ask what the "just in case" is, or would you prefer to explain later?Your friendly neighbourhood Derangement, or Dee for short.
May contain traces of nuts.-
-
Untrod Tripod Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Posts: 11652
- Joined: September 1, 2003
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 954, Derangement wrote:Bussing
I don't bus."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Ergo
Your theory is wrong.
Ergo
Setting up my mislynch after TTH's flip based on your wrong theory is bad."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
onion Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 303
- Joined: January 27, 2009
In post 955, Derangement wrote:I'll also accept a scumclaim or a self-vote as acceptable low-effort alternatives.
In post 959, Green Crayons wrote:I don't bus.
O_O-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
You can reduce your eyelids to normal, half-droop."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
prawneater Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 584
- Joined: December 31, 2014
- Location: Seafood Restaurant
Have you literally never bussed?You're not a real lawyer.-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
In post 958, Untrod Tripod wrote:I mean
there's a small but nonzero chance that there's two scum left
it wouldn't be a super balanced setup, but....
I don't want to lose right now
Not having played a closed game before, I'm not sure whether unbalanced games are frequent enough for this kind of caution to be warranted, but I can see where you're coming from, and will follow suit.
UNVOTE: TellTaleHeart
Since the only downside to playing it safe is ghost-votes being absent from the vote-counter, I'll try to keep some sort of unofficial accuse-o-meter going every so often.Your friendly neighbourhood Derangement, or Dee for short.
May contain traces of nuts.-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
There's a problem with this kind of statement.
If you're scum, even if you had not bussed before, you show awareness of it, which means you're also aware enough of your own meta that you can easily go against it when it becomes convenient.
As it stands, I'd like to take it one step further, and point out Mini 692: Boost Mafia as an instance where youdidbus one of your buddies (TDC).
In post 960, Green Crayons wrote:Ergo
Your theory is wrong.
Ergo
Setting up my mislynch after TTH's flip based on your wrong theory is bad.
I'm not trying to set up any lynches based on associative tells.
I'm merely explaining why I no longer have a problem with thinking you can be scum at the same time as TTH.
I like to think the cases on both of you are good enough to stand on their own.
While my lynch pool remains unchanged, I think I'd prefer to lynch GC first now, if we can.
FOS: Green Crayons
Unofficial Day Three Accuse-o-meter #3.1
Green Crayons – 1+1– prawneater, Derangement
TellTaleHeart – 1+1– Green Crayons, Untrod Tripod
With7alive it takes4lynch, and3to lynch at deadline. Deadline isApril 8, 2015 at 6:35 AM PST.
Not Voting - 6 - ChannelDelibird, onion, TellTaleHeart, Derangement, Untrod Tripod
Countdown: (expired on 2015-04-08 06:35:00)Your friendly neighbourhood Derangement, or Dee for short.
May contain traces of nuts.-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I'm sure it happened at least once.
Nobody is perfect."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 965, Derangement wrote:While my lynch pool remains unchanged, I think I'd prefer to lynch GC first now, if we can.
FOS: Green Crayons
lol @ FOS"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Stop looking for permission from the thread to vote me."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 958, Untrod Tripod wrote:I mean
there's a small but nonzero chance that there's two scum left
it wouldn't be a super balanced setup, but....
I don't want to lose right now
I don't follow what you're saying."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
In post 966, Green Crayons wrote:
I'm sure it happened at least once.
Nobody is perfect.
But, I will add, that it most certainly hasn't happened in the past 5 years!
No, but seriously, bussing is dumb and I don't bus, and predicating a theory on GC bussing is bad."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
In post 968, Green Crayons wrote:Stop looking for permission from the thread to vote me.
The only thing I'm looking for in the thread right now, regarding you, is two more "ayes", followed by your flip.Your friendly neighbourhood Derangement, or Dee for short.
May contain traces of nuts.-
-
TellTaleHeart Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4505
- Joined: August 6, 2014
-
-
Untrod Tripod Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Fat and Sassy
- Posts: 11652
- Joined: September 1, 2003
In post 969, Green Crayons wrote:In post 958, Untrod Tripod wrote:I mean
there's a small but nonzero chance that there's two scum left
it wouldn't be a super balanced setup, but....
I don't want to lose right now
I don't follow what you're saying.
there's literally nothing else to say to explain it?-
-
Derangement Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 613
- Joined: December 2, 2014
In post 972, TellTaleHeart wrote:RL is absolutely kicking my ass right now. I may do a catchup over the weekend and I may not.
Sorry to hear about that.
Hope things look better for you soon.Your friendly neighbourhood Derangement, or Dee for short.
May contain traces of nuts.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.