I think he's null. I haven't seen anything I would call scummy in this game, but nothing really Towny either. What he has posted seems like he's trying to figure out the game, but I'd prefer he post more often (Maybe he's like Mara and not posting much because it's Easter, so I'm willing to wait until after the weekend for this to start happening.).
Alchemist wrote:Lastly, she says a wagon that forms and sticks like mine with no counterwagon is a sure sign that it's on Town.
If you're scum, I think its entirely possible your partner feels compelled to push against you.
Titus wants you to look at Book of Shadows D1. (It's a mini theme from a while back.) She was scum in that game and they bussed D1, but they still tried counterwagons.
In post 446, Quilford wrote:Hey Alchemist. Can you or any of your team buddies provide some actual close analysis? You're all very good at making sweeping generalisations about what a player is saying or doing, but you constantly fail to provide any evidence in the form of a player's words and actions in specific posts.
Alchemist please actually do this with one of your reads, or explain why you can't.
I want some analysis from you, because I'm scumreading you, not Titus, and Titus is from memory fairly accomplished at scum and therefore better at faking scumhunting as an informed minority.
Yes, I should have used 'and', not 'or'. However I am inclined to dismiss the analysis not because it's coming from your teammate but because it's coming from someone more accomplished as scum who just happens to be your teammate. It's like how you might find one player of a hydra easier to read than another.
Just because Titus is good as scum doesn't mean her opinions are automatically invalid, especially since she's good as Town too.
Frankly I'm not surprised at your reaction here. If I were scum in your place, and the guy scumreading me had the impressive think-tank of Titus, ABR, and BBT behind him, I'd probably be shitting my pants too.
Yes it does, because I don't think you are town, and I'm the one who asked you to provide some close analysis in the first place. If Titus is good at faking close analysis as scum and you are not, obviously I want you to post the analysis.
In post 427, Mina wrote:What content do you want me to respond to?
Serious question. I want an answer to this. There were two lines concerning me in that post, neither of which really warranted a response.
(Although BBmolla, that reminds me, shouldn't you a bit warier of me after Marketplace?)
Apparently, I'll have to come right out and say that Patrick looks really town, and this wagon is bad. (Although the way ETL approached it looks genuine.) I'd assumed Patrick townreads were better left unstated.
Also like Quilford's point on Titus being the one providing all the reads, and I'd really like an explanation from ETL/Mara for why serra feels genuine.
In post 457, Alchemist21 wrote:If I were scum in your place, and the guy scumreading me had the impressive think-tank of Titus, ABR, and BBT behind him, I'd probably be shitting my pants too.
I'm shitting myself laughing right now. Does that count?
In post 457, Alchemist21 wrote:Just because Titus is good as scum doesn't mean her opinions are automatically invalid, especially since she's good as Town too.
Frankly I'm not surprised at your reaction here. If I were scum in your place, and the guy scumreading me had the impressive think-tank of Titus, ABR, and BBT behind him, I'd probably be shitting my pants too.
You think Quilford is scum even after all those analysis posts? I thought your case on him was he wasn't scum hunting.
Apparently its now not that I'm not scumhunting, but that Titus thinks "Quil only provided content in response to tearing down my reasoning. She says it's not good content but general feel-good buddying."
All of Molla's posts up through 147 are fluff and him talking about how he hadn't read the game (a small exception here is a defensive post to Serra).
In 157, I voted Quilford. BBMolla's next post is to throw down a naked vote on me and keep fluffing.
In 183, he quotes Patrick's vote on me and calls Patrick Town without any explanation.
She also doesn't like BBMolla pushing an Alch-Serra team because Serra is the one who accused Molla of having a fake opening in 106.
The only real explanation BBMolla gave for his vote on my was my RVS comment. If he saw it earlier and thought it was scummy, then why did he continue fluff posting?
206 is self-posturing from Molla. His posts up to this point were terrible and I pointed this out. BBMolla implied I was believing his posts to make himself look better.
BB's ISO is full of a baseless push on me and she thinks he doesn't want to read BPC because it would actually have to put effort into reading someone.
249 - BB talks about the game is full of veterans and content, but isn't providing any content of his own.
She also doesn't like BBMolla complaining about nobody talking about him when he hasn't given much to talk about.
273 - BBMolla pegs an Alch-Serra scumteam because my early posts lack direction and an agenda. Town should lack direction and an agenda in the early game.
Alchemist wrote:Frankly I'm not surprised at your reaction here. If I were scum in your place, and the guy scumreading me had the impressive think-tank of Titus, ABR, and BBT behind him, I'd probably be shitting my pants too.
Did someone on your team suggest saying something like this?
Primpod 11:13 pm
chamber can you please come to ukmeet
i would love to finally touch your face
Alchemist wrote:Frankly I'm not surprised at your reaction here. If I were scum in your place, and the guy scumreading me had the impressive think-tank of Titus, ABR, and BBT behind him, I'd probably be shitting my pants too.
Did someone on your team suggest saying something like this?
Did Alchemist just post a list of summaries of posts in BBmolla's ISO without actually quoting any of BB's actual words at all? Can someone say information instead of analysis?
Did Alchemist just post a list of summaries of posts in BBmolla's ISO without actually quoting any of BB's actual words at all? Can someone say information instead of analysis?
There are cited post numbers that you can go look up yourself. I assure you my analysis of you will have direct quotes.
