In post 1022, Albert B. Rampage wrote:It's our scumread on Nacho that is strong.
Titus believes that he's aiming to be the most credible person rather than finding scum. The theory spec, the sudden unnatural confidence in Kagami scum, how he's not harassing anyone like his town self. I was also recently scum with Nacho. He always seems reasonable, and here, I think that I found the chink in the armor.
What theory spec have I provided to the game that makes it seem like I'm trying to be a credible person as opposed to finding scum? The theory speculation I remember providing is not really that excessive at all, I remember we should try to keep post counts low for the benefit in the game early, and I remember... maybe agreeing with some of Hoopla's comments? I'm a player that's very focused in on the dynamics of the game, so I comment on the dynamics of the game. This is about as scummy as Titus commenting on VCA early game: some of us scumhunt using unique or lesser used techniques, and bringing them up even though they are not straightforward/classic methods of scumhunting isn't scummy at all.
I'm not... harassing everyone? I'm not walling the shit out of anyone because this is the first time I've touched a laptop in about a month? or so. I've also been busy for life, pushing for a promotion, all that good shit. Despite that, I have scumhunted, I've read the game, I've commented on play, and I've harassed people where possible.
Let's compare that game to this one, shall we? Where did I demonstrate unreasonable confidence in anyone during Pick Your Poison? Contrast this with Curse of the Werewolves, where you played Nacho-town who had a pretty unnatural and complete turn around on mollie-slot (aka your scumbud) D2. That strong confidence I have when I believed I've sold the gamestate or found a portion of the game is how I push lynches, just like how you push lynches: do you think you got a wagon on me because your case was good, or because you found something fantastically special? No, you got a wagon on me because you have an unnatural confidence that certain people (SONIC) believe in.
In post 1024, Albert B. Rampage wrote: In post 1023, GreyICE wrote:Zar? Sotty? Seraphim? Kagami?
That's off the top of my head people that Nacho has pushed and prodded at.
That's why I'm more suspicious of Nacho than Kagami. It's always harder to cut against the grain.
When Kagami started out the game, she wasn't cutting against the grain. She was cutting against GreyICE.
It's also not always the proper move to cut against the grain: sometimes, the tide is leaning a certain way for a reason and bucking against it for absolutely no idea isn't exactly the best play.
In post 1083, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm sure that Nacho is scum. He's participating elsewhere and avoiding this game, rationing his presence like if he said too much he might get suspected. That and the totally unnatural reversal on Kagami.
What reversal on Kagami are you talking about, exactly?
I'm not really able to post in every game every day, which means I end up focusing on some games some days and other games other games. I'm in a lot of games again. I always play on mobile. It's not exactly a cakewalk keeping up and posting in everything every time, and I'd rather be inconsistent and get in good posts occasionally as opposed to consistently posting underwhelming shit, but maybe you feel differently?
In post 1086, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You, me, and zzzy are the most widely townread players in the game. The fact that all of us are voting for Nacho carries a lot of weight.
Sure does!
That does not make it correct!
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
