Alright. I can't see myself changing my mind before tomorrow when I leave on holiday, so I'll leave my vote and my reasoning and Skruffs will hopefully make the right choice.
Vote: Yamahako
Have a look through Yamahako's posting history. Look for mentions, specifcally, of the other two scum.
Post 8: He accuses thrawn of OMGUS, at the same time that he attacks thrawn's attacker, and doesn't FoS or vote either of them, choosing instead to keep his vote on Skruffs because he defended cubsfan's "fishing".
Post 15: he questions UT's vote on him, and then
ignores him for a further 30 posts
, or until well into day 2. In fact, he doesn't mention either scum in that perios of time, choosing instead to focus on Skruffs.
Post 45, 46 and 47: He offers a defence of UT's lurking, then chooses to ignore him again. Knowing as we do now that UT was a mafia doc, that seems pretty damning to me.
Post 49: He FoSses Thrawn for a very weak reason. It seems more like a "stop doing that" post than an accusation.
Post 54: Again defends UT.
Post 55: And again, though he makes sure to say that he isn't defending him
Post 58: FoSses Thrawn (mafia rber) for voting OTU/UT/Zu (mafia doc). Again he defends UT, giving him an out if he wants to claim townie
Posts 59-62: indicates he wants Zu to claim first, despite indicating before that he could well be town. I hate how he keeps repeating that he might just be a townie, not a power role. It seems like a pre-emptive defence for Zu's townie claim. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Yama specifically told him to claim townie.
Post 65: Defends Zu
Again
(albeit against my craplogic).
Post 71: Does not actually make sense: he quotes Skruffs saying he was worried that continuing with the claims would allow a townie to be lynched and says he agrees whereas just a few posts ago he had said that he wanted to finish the massclaim.
Post 74: Defends UT
Again
Post 75: Says he is considering voting Mert instead of Zu Faul, even, because of a semantic slip in Mert's claim!
Post 76: Finally attacks Zu_faul, after defending him many, many times, only after a cop has found him guilty.
I hate the way he butters up Skruffs in post 80, after he was cleared by the cop.
After that he attacks both me and SV: he seems very much to be weighing up both options and seeing which one would be easiest. After I defend myself, he turns on SV. That doesn't quite fit with the nk, but both Skruffs and I had said we though SV was unlikely scum.
I want now to go back to day 1. He votes for and FoSses Jack, Skruffs, cubsfan, AndrewS and HD. None of them scum. He's certainly not being cautious. And yet despite attacking Thrawn over OMGUS and questioning ut's vote for him, he never FoSses or votes either of them that day.