FeRnAnDo 1 (ryan)
ryan 1 (FeRnAnDo)
Aimee 1 (spectrumvoid)
Not Voting 2 (Aimee, Mokina)
4 to lynch.
Tar: I'll deal with that when it happens. It depends on the status of the game at the time.
Why shouldn't I attack FeRnAnDo, he's making excuses for why he can't post a player analysis and you think that's legit? Than he posts a "I'm still here don't worry" post and still doesn't post analysis. EB was already MIA this entire game (and has been replaced) post your analysis and quit waiting for others to lead you.Tarhalindur wrote:Tarhalindur Note: I'm still here, with a little more access than I've had for the last week or so. Unfortunately, I've fallen a bit behind in this game. I'll try to reread and get my thoughts on the game and my reply to Aimee in in the next couple of days.
A quick glance at the thread tells me that ryan is attacking Fernando. I don't like this; as I noted before I got hit with limited access, I spotted something in one of Fernando's posts that makes me 90% sure he's pro-town.FoS: ryan
Unfortunately, I've just got word that I'm going to be on vacation from August 4-12. I'm 90% sure that I'll have no Internet access at that time.Mod, if that's going to be a problem then you should probably start looking for a (temporary?) replacement.
Depends on what kind of information is involved. Tarhalindur seems to be very much confident of FeRnAnDo's innocence, but he isn't prepared to give a reason. This suggests a roletell (which isn't necessarily reliable). Full-town analysis would aid us in this situation... so in that sense, sharing can be a good idea.Aimee wrote:I unequivocally disagree with this.spectrumvoid wrote:Sharing things in mafia is a good idea.
Regarding his earlier play, I agree with Aimee, and would call his behavior suspicious because he contradicted himself by not voting for Barmacral; didn't even place him as his top 2 suspects.Aimee wrote:However, the fact he seems to take two sides to every player is quite concerning - seemingly like he didn't want to step on any toes. I am particularly concerned by the lack of opinion given on ryan, for some reason. I also could see this post being an opportunity to lurk by not really saying much - let's face it, EB was basically saying what had been said up to this point (although it isn't damning evidence against him).
He seems to be happy voting for lurkers "if they don't elicit some good responses," whatever that means. I am interpreting it to mean they aren't saying much. If so, I would expect EB to be voting for Barmacral, who has effectively done this. Let's see...
He comes back at Tar's request, posting his top two targets. I am impressed he didn't pick Barma, and that he picked Tar. Note he picks a lurker and an aggressive players. Really non-committal here.
This is a massive overstatement and exaggeration of the situation. Too opportunistic if you ask me, maybe scum trying to recover from losing a potential suspect for the town.ryan wrote:You could also say that Tarhalindur is scum and that is why he knows FeRnAnDo is innocent
and the subsequentTarhalindur wrote:A quick glance at the thread tells me that ryan is attacking Fernando. I don't like this; as I noted before I got hit with limited access, I spotted something in one of Fernando's posts that makes me 90% sure he's pro-town. FoS: ryan
Unfortunately, I've just got word that I'm going to be on vacation from August 4-12. I'm 90% sure that I'll have no Internet access at that time. Mod, if that's going to be a problem then you should probably start looking for a (temporary?) replacement.
Tar wrote:I will not elaborate at this time.
As early as we are in this game for somebody to say they are 90% sure somebody else is town is a heck of a stretch (even you have to admit that) that is why I posted what I said. I'm a little confused how I made #2 on your most suspicious list when you said you agreed with most if not all of my posts, care to clarify?Albert B. Rampage wrote:: I agree with some, if not most of his posts, but this strikes me as invariably stupid:ryan
This is a massive overstatement and exaggeration of the situation. Too opportunistic if you ask me, maybe scum trying to recover from losing a potential suspect for the town.ryan wrote:You could also say that Tarhalindur is scum and that is why he knows FeRnAnDo is innocent
There is the exact quote. For some reason a few players (Tarha, Fernando and Aimee) seem to have information that they aren't willing to share or at least reasons they feel somebody is town that they aren't willing to share, that isn't very pro town if you ask me and the argument that it will help the scum isn't an argument, the scum know who they are, as long as we aren't giving out roles, I find no reason to not give reasons why somebody is town. We seem to have no problem fingering people for scum, so why not why people are town? One if not two of those three are scum.Tarhalindur wrote:I spotted something in one of Fernando's posts that makes me 90% sure he's pro-town.
He had a chance to explain why Fernando was town and chose to do this post instead. Actually upon a little review of the game I do have a little more suspicion toward Tarhalindur than I did before, something about Aimee isn't sitting right with me right now.Tarhalindur wrote:I will not elaborate at this time.spectrumvoid wrote:Sharing things in mafia is a good idea.
Tarhalindur: Where's the 90& sure bit?
Tarhalindur wrote:If we're going to do nonsensical things in an attempt to get the game moving, we should really make it something mafia-related (like, say, random bandwagoning and lurker hunting). Talking about futbol most assuredly does not help the town find mafia - indeed, such non-game-related discussion actually distracts the town from actually finding mafia.
The correllary here is that talking about a subject unrelated to the game is very good for the scum, since by distracting the townthe scum make it less likely that the town will find and lynch them.Unvote, Vote: Fernando
Aimee wrote:I'm still here. Mod, could we maybe get a prod on Barmacral?