PeaceBringer wrote: In post 1324, Ricastle wrote: In post 1314, PeaceBringer wrote:there is not enough attention being paid to skold lynch other than the loudest pusher. Who was quietly on that or egging it on?
Bella said she was "pretty sure" Skold was scum yet never pushed him. Looking back, that does seem pretty weird. (
902)
yeah, that is super sketchy
vote bella
902: maybe it's was a stupid thought process not to lynch replacements who might be scum over someone I thought was, but that was my logic.
I'm not sure why this is more sketchy than a bunch of other people on the wagon. For example, the vote after mine: Daves' put a vote on him for 'what I remember is finding reasons to take positions, vs finding things and taking positions where they lead', comes in to mention Xay's inactivity and that's it before twilight.
Also, a lot of the last minute vote gathering/wagoning was overnight/while I was at work. If I'd needed/been available for a last minute push to avoid a no-lynch, I had enough behind my read to back it up.
The vote after, and some other votes, discuss voting to avoid a no-lynch, without a better push on a different candidate (e.g. KC).
davesaz wrote:Errantparabola said Skold was town, said he'd prefer Garmr, but voted Skold anyway.
Or, you know, votes like this. (I think Errant might be town, I'm more interested in Peace/Ricastle's focus on me)
In post 1333, Vampirate wrote:I'm up for it.
VOTE: Klingoncelt
Anyways, how do people feel about my exchange between PointYBagelS and myself in post 1259 and 1265?
Eh, I dunno how I feel about this vote. Your quote post doesn't really show progression in your thoughts: maybe you should summarise your case?