Proof of claim is not proof of alignment.
Proof of claim is not proof of alignment.
Proof of claim is not proof of alignment.
Proof of claim is not proof of alignment.
Please write the above 1000 times on a chalkboard.
He claimed over three fucking posts, failed to put flavor in his claim before he'd seen two townflips, and then went back and specified that his role didn't work at L-1.
In post 859, Cabd wrote:Like the SECOND somebody posts, my ability to change their vote is lost until they get prodded again. I have to be online to tell magua to use my power between the prod and them posting to not get replaced. It's basically nearly vanilla, which sucks because I read it at first and got super excited and was thinking I could cause a fakehamer gambit or two with it.
In post 1362, Cabd wrote:My role specifies placing "what would be L-1 for that player" not just "L-1" as a "you can't move a vote to that wagon"
Just the role as mentioned, I didn't expect to be so absent/sick that I had to show it just as a show of good faith to get people less jump-down-throaty.
Too bad, IDGAF
In that order
In post 1374, Cabd wrote:"when the mod doesn't replace lurkers"
"limited role mover"
Still needs to claim before you debate hammering.
Please go read DGB's "how to claim as town" thread. I know Cabd has. This was the OPPOSITE of that.
