weird, I never recalled you ever expressing that you scumread me
are you sheeping someone because this seems a bit out of nowhere to me
In post 1778, Rubicon wrote:In post 1757, Ricastle wrote:I've concluded that the Bella slot is town. I loved her intuition and thought progression - she seemed like she was genuinely sorting the game with every post. She also defended one of the only points against her uncountered (1360), and, more importantly, was scumreading KC, and now has a KC counterwagon building on her.
Isn't it funny how every counterwagonee to KC has been scumreading her? And isn't it funnier how Peace and KC have been on both those wagons?
Your reads are based on who scumreads KC or who KC scumreads. That's pretty bad, even if she's scum.
In post 1818, Ricastle wrote:So how does that validate a Bella vote over a Klingon one?In post 1816, RationalMadman wrote:Not sure but IF they are i'm certian they'd bus their death smei-clears bella.
In post 1824, Xayzeck wrote:In post 1786, Grib wrote:Oh, forgot to mention: I picked games that Xayzeck was a VT in (no PR games) since that's what Garmr claimed.
Pretty sure you picked a scumgame
In post 1812, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1810, elusive wrote:I'm also not a fan of him suddenly stating that he feels "meh" towards KlingonCelt. No, want to kill someone? Work yourself into a pristine fury and make it clear that their bones will gleam in the afterquake of your intensity.
And I hate it that you are ignoring my explanation and STILL not explaining why Ric's sk hunting was scummier today than it was yesterday.
In post 1677, Ricastle wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=61108 (scum)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=60334 (town)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=60635 (town)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=60385 (Hippie is scum, right?)
Keep in mind I had to skim these games pretty hard in order to gather information at a decent pace.
In post 1030, Xayzeck wrote:Yo Nero can you like post scumreads and I'll iso them
In post 1831, elusive wrote:Unless someone can make a coherent case on why they think she's scum, I'm not buying what's been "sold" so far on her
In post 1830, elusive wrote:So, Nero, will you be able to provide reasons for your town vs. scum reads now? The explanation can simply be about a post or reasoning they used that was really good.
In post 1825, Xayzeck wrote:
weird, I never recalled you ever expressing that you scumread me
are you sheeping someone because this seems a bit out of nowhere to me
In post 1748, Vampirate wrote:In post 1747, Rubicon wrote:In post 1744, Vampirate wrote:I want to hear from others on what they think of the argument me and Pointy are having so far and weigh in with their opinions.
Does his reply make you think he's townier?
Not really, although this is kinda meta, I feel a town person would really claw into every single point I made, not single out some and leave out others.
Another thing is I feel like his reason for voting me is made up, the closest thing he had in his post that voted me was I wasn't scum hunting at the time.
From an outside perspective i can see that.
His other points though I really don't like.
In post 1833, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1830, elusive wrote:So, Nero, will you be able to provide reasons for your town vs. scum reads now? The explanation can simply be about a post or reasoning they used that was really good.
Maybe, I've already explained my scumreads. I think this is one of the problems I have with you, you seem very distant from the game at times. I mean you'll come in and post things that don't exactly make sense-its almost like you are playing another game than I am.
Maybe I'm just a little salty that you are treating me as scum when I've done nothing scummy so it looks a lil' chainsawish so I'm a little
But Xay/Peace and House are deff scum. And in my mind that leaves you, Celt and Bagels as the most likely scum. Already talked about you and Celt. Bagels mostly for having House as null which I think alot of scum list their buddies as null sometimes, its not very strong though. I'm agreeing that Castles skhunting was strange and sure, maybe it comes from scum but I think it would have been scummier if there were a sk in this game, wich I guess is still possible but both kills would have to be stopped last night and I feel its somewhat unlikely.
In post 1833, Nero Cain wrote:But Xay/Peace and House are deff scum. And in my mind that leaves you, Celt and Bagels as the most likely scum. Already talked about you and Celt. Bagels mostly for having House as null which I think alot of scum list their buddies as null sometimes, its not very strong though. I'm agreeing that Castles skhunting was strange and sure, maybe it comes from scum but I think it would have been scummier if there were a sk in this game, wich I guess is still possible but both kills would have to be stopped last night and I feel its somewhat unlikely.
In post 1836, Grib wrote:Xayzeck, you're basically scumreading Boon for the exact same thing you're doing. That's something you didn't respond to that I'd say is a little important.
That's not what I said...Klingon FoSed Nero for a specific angle House was equally guilty of. She accepts this, as is evident in 1384, and used custom as an excuse to get out of it. It's bottom-line selective scumhunting.In post 1838, elusive wrote:Also, I just don't agree with Ricastle that there wasn't reason to FOS you over the Boon and then House things. I found those to be weird then and now.
Good luck with that, bub.In post 1838, elusive wrote:Things I still need to do: Meta dive Ricastle
In post 1831, elusive wrote:
...
So I looked at these games plus part of the KC one on USMB. Unless someone can make a coherent case on why they think she's scum, I'm not buying what's been "sold" so far on her. There is something slightly different here but I'm sure those with the ability to infer can figure out why that may or may not be the case. I don't like her Bellaphant vote though and want that reads list.
In post 1740, PointYBagelS wrote:This is a reply to 1654. I'm not quoting it because of how long it is.
Responses:
4: They tend to go hand in hand
5: You call me a liar and then say something like this with no hint of irony? There is no meta in my argument against you.
6: As elusive said, once the skold wagon started he posted like twice.
8: If you do then you are wrong.
9: do you know what the word "appears" means?
15: Sure you're scumhunting now, after I called you on not doing it.
On House:
I didn't like the Skold wagon and I've made no secret of it. House led the skold wagon. He's on my potential scum list for that, but right now he's not really triggering my scum radar for other reasons.
House hard defending your slot was more of a vehicle to push his own wagon, while your hard defense of Ricastle was solely to stop the wagon. These are not the same thing like you claim they are.
I want a response to 5. That is a complete and blatant lie. Why are you trying to construe a hypothetical statement as meta?
In post 1259, PointYBagelS wrote: I don't understand why a town-Vampirate wouldn't think the same of Skold, who also lurked through most of his wagon.