What do you make of him calling Dan town day 1, but now seems to have an issue with me calling Dan town which I did day 1 also?
That doesn't seem like town actions to me
In post 574, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 563, NotAnAxehole wrote:In post 547, Jake from State Farm wrote:I mean its possible but at this stage of the game he's my top read. I'd also vote havoc but hammer without claim > lurking
P.edit - palkia replaced Dan right?Dan wasn't scummy
@bbt, I've seen scum hammer/troll like palkia was doing, so that's another reason I'm suspicious of him. He kinda reminds me of house when he's scum
P.edit again - the Lynch was right, but hammering without a claim isn't something town would normally do. Sxum would cause if its a PR flip, scum win
???
He wasn't, I even said as much. He pretty much had the same thoughts I had on a couple if players and I even said so in one of my posts.
You were calling Dan town yourself on multiple occasions so why do you now question his townyness?
In post 573, Elyse wrote:My point is that you didn't comment (and still haven't really) on the elephant in the room from yesterday (the PB quicklynch). It seems to me like you were testing the waters and seeing what other people were thinking before taking action.
In post 576, NotAnAxehole wrote:So, let me get this straight
Slot A is occupied by Dan, Dan is town...
Slot A is vacated
Slot A is occupied by Palkia, Palkia is scum??
In post 581, Elyse wrote:How is it not?
From your PoV, a bunch of people quicklynched someone you expected to flip town as a counter to someone you are scumreading. And then you barely say anything and go after Jake. It makes no sense.
P-edit:
I forgot TDA was in the game.
He could be scum I guess.
Also, why Rune and why not Havoc?
@Rune
I am fine with lynching Havoc first. I am convinced Axe and Havoc are a team so it doesn't matter either way to me.
In post 581, Elyse wrote:
@Rune
I am fine with lynching Havoc first. I am convinced Axe and Havoc are a team so it doesn't matter either way to me.
In post 550, Jake from State Farm wrote:Bbt, how about you tell me what's protown about hammering somebody without a claim and without a good reason and the trolli g the game after basically laughing at us saying FU.
In post 587, Rune wrote:In post 581, Elyse wrote:
@Rune
I am fine with lynching Havoc first. I am convinced Axe and Havoc are a team so it doesn't matter either way to me.
How to explain the counterwagon to Havoc in that case?
In post 577, Rune wrote:If the set of Palkia, Oversoul, Hostile, and Havoc doesn't contain at least two members of a scumteam, I will be surprised.
In post 584, Rune wrote:IMO Havoc, Oversoul, and Palkia
In post 592, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 584, Rune wrote:IMO Havoc, Oversoul, and Palkia
Why palkia 3rd?
In post 588, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 550, Jake from State Farm wrote:Bbt, how about you tell me what's protown about hammering somebody without a claim and without a good reason and the trolli g the game after basically laughing at us saying FU.
This one
In post 590, Elyse wrote:In post 587, Rune wrote:In post 581, Elyse wrote:
@Rune
I am fine with lynching Havoc first. I am convinced Axe and Havoc are a team so it doesn't matter either way to me.
How to explain the counterwagon to Havoc in that case?
Hm?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Havoc