Oh hello we have Senator at L-1. I'm around for a little bit longer, holding a hammer. I'm not sure, I have no idea, but if we feel like we're good then I'll hammer.
I think FAQ2 can also be excluded for posting the maths in 1635 I don't think the SK would share this with town.
Early game, there was set-up spec from Lane; this shows he tends to look at the game as a whole. However, during his whole time in the game (until towards the end of Day yesterday, which we will come to soon) he never once mentions SK. This doesn't quite fit with his overall view of the game.
Then, when Reverend jumps on me as SK, Lane is very quick to jump on this. He also says he 'trusted me' on Rev. I found this weird because he shouldn't want to lynch me if he trusts me. Thinking about it, it actually allowed Lane to line up two lynches; lynch me, I flip town then lynch Rev.
Everyone seems to think that Flubber was killed because SK knew he was scum. What if he was killed for other reasons? Such as to set up ConMan (SK may have assumed town flip remember) or because Flubber didn't have too many interactions and was a low info kill?
I actually think it could be Lane.
VOTE: Lane
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
Sk killed flubber because they got a good shot. Have you seen my scumhunting?! I never once thought any of the scum were scum. I'm not that good, that's obvious.
My trust of you on rev would've come after you flipped town I said I would go for rev.
Why would I mention sk when there were 3 scum left? You know that doesn't make sense. Also it wasn't set up spec. It's an open. Setup is known. I said I was bummed there wasn't more than 1 faction.
Bella, docs are primed for repeat action, no changes to element selections. Back up: in the event of dead doc, don't say anything, just take their element.
There are other motivations behind killing Flubber other than SK knew he was scum.
Which, as SK, would have allowed you two lynches, which is perfect.
Because it fits with your view of looking at the game as a whole (as you did in the beginning)
You're also insistent that I am SK and you're basing it on the fact that SK knew Flubber was scum (and as I said, I believe other motivations where behind the kill of Flubber) I think you want to get rid of me but don't want to waste a kill so you're trying to lynch me knowing there was some support behind the SK!BBT theory.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
Second line is confusing - I'm talking about you wanting to lynch me and then Reverend - two lynches is perfect for you and it was a good way to set that up and base it on 'BBT has been right so far, let's follow what he said.'
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
jk