NY 183 - Apocalypse Mafia

Ricastle · Post Post #2225 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 12:28 pm

In post 2223, PeaceBringer wrote:ricastle...
since you are out there as not vanilla, the only reason I thought perhaps you would be so stubborn regarding KC was if it was an alternative investigative that came up different, either that or ultra cocky with your reads, or scum trying to lead town. I still do not know which...

You are free to dispute my scumreads. I am not inclined to agree with you; why is not doing so cocky?

Nero Cain · Post Post #2226 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 12:28 pm

me cocky and stubborn?

PeaceBringer · Post Post #2227 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 12:31 pm

In post 2225, Ricastle wrote:
In post 2223, PeaceBringer wrote:ricastle...
since you are out there as not vanilla, the only reason I thought perhaps you would be so stubborn regarding KC was if it was an alternative investigative that came up different, either that or ultra cocky with your reads, or scum trying to lead town. I still do not know which...
You are free to dispute my scumreads. I am not inclined to agree with you; why is not doing so cocky?

disagreeing with me is not, your attitude and attempt to lead town is... it is not the words, it is the tone...

Ricastle · Post Post #2228 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 12:42 pm

That doesn't have anything to do with the reads themselves, but anyway...

elusive · Post Post #2229 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 12:52 pm

Well, it does but then again...

Ricastle · Post Post #2230 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 1:01 pm

Advertisement and product are two different things.

elusive · Post Post #2231 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 1:08 pm

I know but I wonder why advertisement is such a huge industry....like why even bother?

PointYBagelS · Post Post #2232 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 1:14 pm

This game is starting to go off the rails.

VOTE: Klingoncelt

L-2

elusive · Post Post #2233 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 1:44 pm

What do you make of PB's claim that he tracked her and there was no action on her behalf?

RIP · Post Post #2234 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 1:56 pm

What were the reasons for tracking KC and elusive?

RIP · Post Post #2235 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 1:59 pm

Also grib that makes sense now, but I realize it doesn't clear him for saying boon was scum.
If anything it proves either scum didn't know boon was scum or that para is actually town who found boon scummy.
Thanks

elusive · Post Post #2236 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:00 pm

Mafia don't know the traitor identity is what's normal, I think

RIP · Post Post #2237 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:01 pm

If KC didn't go anywhere does it means she's town? Or that she's a vanilla scum with no NA?
What kinda setup is this?

PeaceBringer · Post Post #2238 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:03 pm

In post 2234, RIP wrote:What were the reasons for tracking KC and elusive?

because they were suspected by several... what about what I said is difficult to understand. When are you actually going to read stuff vs asking these silly questions.

RIP · Post Post #2239 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:04 pm

I think once we lynch a scum that's actually tied to the team, we will get a ton more info.
The only info I can find on boon is the KC stuff. If we are wrong then it's gonna take a lot of work since we don't know who to look for

RIP · Post Post #2240 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:05 pm

In post 2238, PeaceBringer wrote:
In post 2234, RIP wrote:What were the reasons for tracking KC and elusive?

because they were suspected by several... what about what I said is difficult to understand. When are you actually going to read stuff vs asking these silly questions.

Can u calm down?
I'm not pickings on u. I wanted to see ur motives that's all.
I understood then and I understand now, damn people don't want me to ask anything ffs

PointYBagelS · Post Post #2241 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:09 pm

In post 2233, elusive wrote:What do you make of PB's claim that he tracked her and there was no action on her behalf?

I don't think it is very alignment indicative, especially since there was no kill that night.

Nero Cain · Post Post #2242 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:11 pm

In post 2237, RIP wrote:If KC didn't go anywhere does it means she's town? Or that she's a vanilla scum with no NA?
What kinda setup is this?

She's a claimed vt, the track on her either confirms that she is a vt or she is a goon that did not perform a team action.

In post 2239, RIP wrote:If we are wrong then it's gonna take a lot of work since we don't know who to look for

Well we aren't you doing any work "mr. game solver"?

PeaceBringer · Post Post #2243 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:12 pm

In post 2240, RIP wrote:
In post 2238, PeaceBringer wrote:
In post 2234, RIP wrote:What were the reasons for tracking KC and elusive?

because they were suspected by several... what about what I said is difficult to understand. When are you actually going to read stuff vs asking these silly questions.

Can u calm down?
I'm not pickings on u. I wanted to see ur motives that's all.
I understood then and I understand now, damn people don't want me to ask anything ffs

well when you ask a question that has been asked and answered it is quite annoying and clearly indicates that you haven't read. It would be one thing if you thought I was unclear, I am used to that, but another to apparently have not even read recent dialogue on something answered clearly.

Errantparabola · Post Post #2244 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:18 pm

Okay at the time of Page 83 I'm inclined to think PB def town over castle but they can be both town and that's feasible
I don't understand why RIP thinks that scum has to be in House's reads + I'm very inclined to think nero town over rip

pb seems to be the only other person also reluctant to lynch kc
his proposed alternatives are castle, pointy, me, and taly
i could go castle here

In post 2100, PeaceBringer wrote:you really think I would hard defend a fellow scum...

why not?

YO pointy what's scum motivation behind no kill

PeaceBringer · Post Post #2245 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:23 pm

In post 2244, Errantparabola wrote:why not?

generally does not work out well for coscum to do that...

PointYBagelS · Post Post #2246 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:34 pm

In post 2244, Errantparabola wrote:
YO pointy what's scum motivation behind no kill

I think no kill would have been a terrible idea and I doubt they did it. Doesn't rule out something like a jailkeeper though.

I doubt this game has doctors or town-aligned bulletproofs.

Grib · Post Post #2247 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:39 pm

Rubicon · Post Post #2248 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:50 pm

Unvote

PointYBagelS · Post Post #2249 (ISO) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:51 pm

Call it a gut feeling.

I'm more inclined to think they are around if Peace is lying, but his claim actually seems pretty likely. No one has counterclaimed so Peace is Townlean for now.

You still haven't answered my question Grib. Are you claiming vigilante?