Oh, okay. Well I would have known that alreadyIn post 22, Bins wrote:My role PM says so
Tree Stumps are vanillas without the vote.
Oh, okay. Well I would have known that alreadyIn post 22, Bins wrote:My role PM says so
In post 25, Ricastle wrote:Oh, okay. Well I would have known that alreadyIn post 22, Bins wrote:My role PM says soif the mod remembered this was smalltown
Tree Stumps are vanillas without the vote.
In post 20, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 10, Derangement wrote:
@Flubbernugget:
You mean the gameisn'ta bastard one?
VOTE: Flubbernugget for not voting in RVS.
Ika posted in the queue that the game isn't bastard. He specified that there are no role changing mechanics.
I still think tree-stumping is a little bastard, but it might just be non-normal. What is/isn't bastard might be a way to catch and/or restrict fakeclaims, but at the same time the game can't turn into an argument about what is/isn't bastard. There has to be balance.
That being said I think stopping and analyzing a player's claim is a little more productive than an rvs vote
That's indeed the case according to the wiki. But oh well. Ika obviously didn't intend it that way so nevermind.In post 28, Flubbernugget wrote:Isn't smalltown where you have everyone's role without their alignment?
In post 38, Ricastle wrote:That's indeed the case according to the wiki. But oh well. Ika obviously didn't intend it that way so nevermind.In post 28, Flubbernugget wrote:Isn't smalltown where you have everyone's role without their alignment?
McMenno's claim sounds like the most broken role to ever exist so I highly doubt it's legit, but if it is, shouldn't lynching him be top priority? We don't lose any players and get an alignment flip.
In post 39, Wanderer-nl wrote:
McMenno's claim: well I went wtf, and since this game is called wtf and we're all supposed to get wtf-roles, I'm inclined to believe it.
In post 40, ika wrote:everyones role (minus the 3rd party scum) have equal chance of being scum i randomed who would be getting scum roles are not alignment indicative
In post 38, Ricastle wrote:
McMenno's claim sounds like the most broken role to ever exist so I highly doubt it's legit, but if it is, shouldn't lynching him be top priority? We don't lose any players and get an alignment flip.
In post 43, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: mcmenno
His role only makes sense if it was thought up with an alignment in mind
In post 41, Derangement wrote:Oh god. Now I really hope Bins got scum randomly assigned to her, or I'm missing something huge about the rest of her role.
In post 45, Derangement wrote:
And we know there's a third-party scum, who is the one person whose alignmentwasn'trandomly picked.
In post 46, Bins wrote:In post 41, Derangement wrote:Oh god. Now I really hope Bins got scum randomly assigned to her, or I'm missing something huge about the rest of her role.
?