In post 344, Heartless wrote:In post 341, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:then ask him why
flubber why do you think von and dcl are scum?
It's not Anti's obligation to ask him why. It's Flubber's to make himself clear and understood from the beginning. That is, if he wants to, which is part of what Anti is speculating on.
In post 329, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Read what I said about Vic. Then read it again. Maybe read it once more? Votes with no explanation make my gut think town. That's literally it, and it's not a substantial read at all. I had no gut feelings either way for the three of ya I put down at the bottom.
No, I don't think scum can hold the gun, obviously. I'm saying that it's more difficult for scum to influence a whole bunch of votes (a lotta people to influence), and it is much easier to influence a single person, ie the gunbearer. There are a large number of scum right now, so it only takes a few townies suggesting a shot that happens to be town for the scum to see and agree with, thereby creating a lean on that person for the shot. Also, scum can choose the gunbearer, remember? They indirectly control the shot (obviously not nacho's, but every shot after that), so it's more dangerous to just follow the gunbearer's lead, as that gunbearer's lead is geared towards what the scum wants, especially if the gunbearer is left to their own devices and town is afraid to argue with them.
Basically, I'm saying that is has to be a discussion, not done by majority vote and definitely not by just following the gunbearer.
In post 331, julienvonwolfe wrote:In post 311, Flubbernugget wrote:@julien can you show me where dcl is scumhunting?
Seems to me that she was angry and didn't post properly until 150 and then promptly went on V/LA. I'm wondering why you needed to ask me that.
In post 341, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:strong player who should be affecting this game being slippery like a fish
In post 187, Flubbernugget wrote:von you're scum reading people for the same reasons you're null reading others
"I can't read hydras" doesn't cut it
In post 348, Wanderer-nl wrote:@Heartless: A tad? You call 8 scumreads! How are you going to pick one of them out to 'vote' for shooting down?
In post 350, Flubbernugget wrote:This is also bullshit. There's always incomplete information in any conversation, and you're choosing to scum read me for it because(??)
In post 359, Flubbernugget wrote:I'd rather you refute my scum reads than just complain that they're raw
Like if there was a cop guilty on someone right now would you complain about the depth of my read on them?
In post 364, Flubbernugget wrote:
detached town has no need to catch up like this
I use catch up loosely but whatever
In post 261, millar13 wrote:was going to say something interesting about wanderer-nl, but Heartless' avi distracted me. i thought it was Zubat lol
In post 365, millar13 wrote:In post 364, Flubbernugget wrote:
detached town has no need to catch up like this
I use catch up loosely but whatever
thats no a response
In post 330, pablito wrote:Just as much as others are suspecting wanderer for not doing scum-hunting, I'm getting Maxwell as being half-assed scum-hunting. Which is why I asked the question of a voting system. If I felt Maxwell was pure town, I'd've wanted Maxwell to actually try to implement something. But I don't get the sense that Maxwell wants that. So prove me wrong Maxwell and force everyone to look at certain players through some type of referendum or focused-voting system.
In post 369, West9 wrote:Did I ask bad questions about Lucky and Red or is it just that nobody knows them?
