In post 4372, shos wrote:yes we know that, but ceph not-wanting to elaborate on the mechanics of his role is intriguing.
What? It works exactly the way you'd expect it does. Why would I be a ninja vote switcher? That would be stupid.
In post 4372, shos wrote:yes we know that, but ceph not-wanting to elaborate on the mechanics of his role is intriguing.
So why didn't you say so yesterday? it just looks like you're completely skimming the game, you know?In post 4369, Cephrir wrote:In post 4359, shos wrote:@wis and ceph: as i have said in my claim, this counts as targetting myself for all other stufd apart from my own action. My action can be tracked to myself, watched as me targetting me, blocked, redirected (so that i see if X has been targetted)[btw, the pm phrasing does not include my name, so in theory, this result can be of someone else]
This is stupid. I don't believe that this role even exists in the first place.
huh.?In post 4359, shos wrote:@wisdom: theres a difference betweeen not noticing that as a bystander and not noticing something that DIRECTLY contradicts what YOU did. Like, you had to send a "target shos" message to the mod, how can you not notice that.
Said the king of not cocking up roleclaims. Oh, wait, no, you totally did.
???In post 4359, shos wrote:@ceph- I do, so please do. And re boner - I have been trying to lynch iece for a while now, in case you ignore the thread, as it seems from your "miss".
Literally not what you just said and I don't even know what the "@ceph" here is even saying.
I'm not sure what the hell you think is going on. The role is passive, yes, but it explicitly says, which I have already told everyone, that it counts as me making an action. Consider it a compulsive self watcher, yes? would you as a mod require the person to PM you it? that's stupid, lol, and magua indeed hasn't.In post 4359, shos wrote:Why did you preaume the ability is passive when i explocitly claimed otherwise?
If it's active, then you have to activate it. Are you telling me you PMed the mod saying "I would like to watch myself tonight"? Get fucking real.
I don't recall any decrease in the people wanting you dead. it's as it's always been - people think you're scum, and nobody's voting, lol. The self meta argument.. *ignores*In post 4359, shos wrote:And scum nees a mislynch today. If they dont get it, the setup will kill them. Gice can confirm the non-PRs, and the PRs can actually get guilties by blocking scum kill or tracking them. Unless - the PRsare scum,partly, in which case they need to fake results and reasoning for them. People have wanted you dead like all gamw, so you're a viable sacrifice. If you were scum, gambitting there, getting two PR kills and aislynch in exchange for you dying makes aense imo, and im not even reaching
People have wanted me dead at times. They don't anymore. And I have too big an ego as scum to give myself up. Also, Greyice is probably scum, so.
This is probably true, though.
Wisdom. Stop it.
And if you believe shos and somehow think I am town too, you should probably be voting T-Bone.
In post 4375, Cephrir wrote:In post 4372, shos wrote:yes we know that, but ceph not-wanting to elaborate on the mechanics of his role is intriguing.
What? It works exactly the way you'd expect it does. Why would I be a ninja vote switcher? That would be stupid.
In post 4377, shos wrote:So why didn't you say so yesterday? it just looks like you're completely skimming the game, you know?In post 4369, Cephrir wrote:In post 4359, shos wrote:@wis and ceph: as i have said in my claim, this counts as targetting myself for all other stufd apart from my own action. My action can be tracked to myself, watched as me targetting me, blocked, redirected (so that i see if X has been targetted)[btw, the pm phrasing does not include my name, so in theory, this result can be of someone else]
This is stupid. I don't believe that this role even exists in the first place.
In post 4377, shos wrote:huh.?In post 4359, shos wrote:@wisdom: theres a difference betweeen not noticing that as a bystander and not noticing something that DIRECTLY contradicts what YOU did. Like, you had to send a "target shos" message to the mod, how can you not notice that.
Said the king of not cocking up roleclaims. Oh, wait, no, you totally did.
I don't know what 'cocking up' means, but in general, this is how I see it:
1. My PoV, or other people's:
I made a list of role claims and info about them. if you notice, it says 'switched shos and ns votes'. It doesn't specify deeply about the technical mechanics of how this happened, and it's in a sea of information. missing it, especially when not looking for it, is perfectly possible, and indeed it happened.
2. your PoV: sees shos claim "I was not targetted N2". you claim that you *literally* had to pm the mod that you target me and NS. I really can't see how you can miss that; especially since there was like, 4, maybe 5 pages all talking about my claim, SPECIFICALLY about the "contradiction" between the claim and an earlier post. People pushed it legitimately, and I explained it thoroughly, and through all this you did not remember that you targetted me?
this sounds odd, at BEST.
In post 4377, shos wrote:???In post 4359, shos wrote:@ceph- I do, so please do. And re boner - I have been trying to lynch iece for a while now, in case you ignore the thread, as it seems from your "miss".
Literally not what you just said and I don't even know what the "@ceph" here is even saying.
I've been pushing Iece for a long while, how comes you didn't see this? should I start quoting my ISO a billion times.? The @ceph means that I want you to elaborate on your role and how it works, since you deemed my request unworthy or unnecessary or something. I can't see how this hurts you if you were town, so why resist.?
In post 4377, shos wrote:I'm not sure what the hell you think is going on. The role is passive, yes, but it explicitly says, which I have already told everyone, that it counts as me making an action. Consider it a compulsive self watcher, yes? would you as a mod require the person to PM you it? that's stupid, lol, and magua indeed hasn't.In post 4359, shos wrote:Why did you preaume the ability is passive when i explocitly claimed otherwise?
If it's active, then you have to activate it. Are you telling me you PMed the mod saying "I would like to watch myself tonight"? Get fucking real.
In post 4377, shos wrote:I don't recall any decrease in the people wanting you dead. it's as it's always been - people think you're scum, and nobody's voting, lol. The self meta argument.. *ignores*In post 4359, shos wrote:And scum nees a mislynch today. If they dont get it, the setup will kill them. Gice can confirm the non-PRs, and the PRs can actually get guilties by blocking scum kill or tracking them. Unless - the PRsare scum,partly, in which case they need to fake results and reasoning for them. People have wanted you dead like all gamw, so you're a viable sacrifice. If you were scum, gambitting there, getting two PR kills and aislynch in exchange for you dying makes aense imo, and im not even reaching
People have wanted me dead at times. They don't anymore. And I have too big an ego as scum to give myself up. Also, Greyice is probably scum, so.
In post 4379, Wisdom wrote:Because they are both town
In post 4380, shos wrote:In post 4375, Cephrir wrote:In post 4372, shos wrote:yes we know that, but ceph not-wanting to elaborate on the mechanics of his role is intriguing.
What? It works exactly the way you'd expect it does. Why would I be a ninja vote switcher? That would be stupid.
it's a stupid role anyway, and there seems to be something wrong here, so I'm not assuming anything. What would a track result on you be?
pedit:
@reck, read the game please.
In post 4381, Wisdom wrote:ceph can you ask whether your role counts as you visiting the two targets?
In post 4380, shos wrote:@reck, read the game please.
In post 4388, xRECKONERx wrote:why isn't it shos v ceph
In post 4393, Wisdom wrote:BUT WE KNOW HE DID
In post 4395, Wisdom wrote:SO HOW IS CEPH SCUM
In post 4396, Cephrir wrote:so he's resorted to shit like "my self watcher can be redirected, causing me to watch someone else" which is just about the most ridiculous thing ever