Jeanne11
elusive
Wanderer-nl
shos
BRantz
Derangement
Drixx:
McMenno
Bellaphant:
Ricastle:
Bins
In post 195, Jeanne11 wrote:So who is the new gunbearer?
And why is that?In post 202, McMenno wrote:Dunno where my vote's at, but this seems like the most logical place:
VOTE: Derangement
In post 14, Bins wrote:Btw I'm hated
don't you think we should not be having you around in lylo?In post 53, Bins wrote:i don't really fear the fact that i'm hated. nor do i mind. i don't see why you should.
This post is the first of yours in the game, and this is what you comment on? there's plenty to talk about already. Why stay out?In post 58, Ricastle wrote:Sure, I'd love one.In post 55, Drixx wrote:So ... anyone want a stripper pole tonight?
^^^scumpost. town souldn't.In post 60, Bellaphant wrote:Yeah, if you are offering.
Wondering about lynching McMenno just to get his weird role out of the way.
townpostIn post 68, Ricastle wrote:If the claim is true then we just ignore him.
elaborated townpost. this is good, but Ricastle was first..but this is elaborated and has good arguments.In post 73, Drixx wrote:The best play is to ignore him until we get other scum first. We know there are 3 scum plus one third party scum. If he's being honest, then lynching him is super dangerous. If he's lying to present just this conundrum to us, we can lynch him later. If he's telling the truth about being able to vote after death, and he's scum, then it still makes sense to kill him later. In every case the best play is to just set him aside until we get 2 or 3 of the scum dead, and re-evaluate from there. He can use that time to try and convince us he's town by his play.
In post 75, Drixx wrote:If he's town, scum aren't going to night kill him and leave him as a stump who can vote. If he's scum, obviously scum aren't going to night kill him. Him making that claim ensured that his win condition is anti-town. He will never die in such a way that results in him having a pro-town vote afterwards (if his claim is true), and there's no way in hell he can be trusted in LYLO. He wins by surviving so if it goes to LYLO, scum will just vote and he'll follow and he doesn't give a shit which team wins so long as he wins.
He's a policy lynch as a survivor, and he knows it. The only real question is whether or not he actually has some kind of post death treestump voting ability. To me, that would fall into bastard territory but I'm not sure about the site guidelines and whether it would just be "non normal" or if it would be considered a bastard role. I'm tempted to just call bullshit on it and encourage that we kill the survivor as a matter of policy. If his claim is honest, he's even more of a threat than survivor's normally are.
In post 76, Derangement wrote:In post 75, Drixx wrote:If he's town, scum aren't going to night kill him and leave him as a stump who can vote. If he's scum, obviously scum aren't going to night kill him. Him making that claim ensured that his win condition is anti-town. He will never die in such a way that results in him having a pro-town vote afterwards (if his claim is true), and there's no way in hell he can be trusted in LYLO. He wins by surviving so if it goes to LYLO, scum will just vote and he'll follow and he doesn't give a shit which team wins so long as he wins.
He's a policy lynch as a survivor, and he knows it. The only real question is whether or not he actually has some kind of post death treestump voting ability. To me, that would fall into bastard territory but I'm not sure about the site guidelines and whether it would just be "non normal" or if it would be considered a bastard role. I'm tempted to just call bullshit on it and encourage that we kill the survivor as a matter of policy. If his claim is honest, he's even more of a threat than survivor's normally are.
The thing is, if his claim is legit, then while he's alive, he's an unknown.
He might help or hinder town, depending on which faction's the closest to winning.
But if he dies, then he'sguaranteedto be a problem for the faction dropping the hammer.
I am in no rush to risk the latter scenario, if I can help it.
In post 77, Drixx wrote:Don't you get it? Let's say he's being completely honest. His win condition will change after he's dead, but he still won't know who is scum or town, so he could just as likely help either side. Any way we slice it he is trouble, but he's muchmoretrouble if left alive, especially at end game. He has no incentive whatsoever to play for a town win and therefore is a policy lynch. The only reason we haven't already all agreed to lynch him today and moved on to talking about other things is because of his whole "My win condition changes from survivor to whichever team is responsible for killing me, and I get to vote when I'm dead so you better not lynch me" bullshit. Like ... that's exactly the kind of fake claim to expect from a Neutral Survivor who is aware of how anti-neutral the site meta is here. It is considerably more likely than not that the whole alignment changing (bastard for sure) voting after dead (at the very best non-normal, if not bastard) claim is just pure bullshit.
Is this logically difficult... at all?
In post 81, Derangement wrote:Okay, so.
By clever application of stalking, we know my post #27 was at19:02:31;
McMenno's last post on site was at21:12:25.
He is neither scum-hunting nor answering our questions.
So I'm inclined to suggest we start piling votes on him, if this doesn't change.
In the off chance that McMenno's claim isn't fake, we find a third-party who's willing to drop the hammer, assuming McMenno's victory condition only changes if there's an actualfactioninvolved.
If someone helps us with this, and McMenno turns out to really have been telling the truth, then that person's contribution will have helpedimmensely, making them pretty much unlynchable.
I'd offer to do so myself, but unfortunately I am town.
Any thoughts, comments, suggestions on how to improve on this idea, or flaws I might have missed are very welcome.
In post 83, Drixx wrote:Was there some part of #77 that was confusing, or are you trying to get me to scum read you for some reason flubber? I don't see me at all defending that bullshit claim there. I don't think there's any upside to letting him live. The worst case scenario is that his claim is actually true, and I am almost completely certain that he was spewing bullshit all over the place. Someone would have to come into the game and outright claim to be scum to get me to want to lynch someone else today, at this point.
Since there's no conceivable universe where scum come into the thread and say they are scum (would result in a mod kill I believe since it's playing against win condition), you should take that as confirmation that I plan to hammer the shit out of McMenno. I'm looking forward to it. In fact, I'm going to just go ahead and giveintent to hammerright now. Whomever puts him at L-1 ... know that I'm gonna hammer the second I notice.
In post 84, Derangement wrote:In post 83, Drixx wrote:you should take that as confirmation that I plan to hammer the shit out of McMenno. I'm looking forward to it. In fact, I'm going to just go ahead and giveintent to hammerright now. Whomever puts him at L-1 ... know that I'm gonna hammer the second I notice.
Whoa. Thank you!
Didn't expect we'd find a third-party that was pro-town enough to volunteer this quickly.
such quick voting after the intent to hammer
^^^^is town
In post 214, elusive wrote:I'm not scum, lurking seems like a scum tell for mcmenno.
Are you also claiming hated here?! If not, who are you referring to?In post 206, shos wrote: that makes the game super unbalanced towards scum; and with another hated guy here - I'm starting to think that this claim is faulty. but again, it's just too risky to lynch, is it not???
That is Bins lol.In post 219, shos wrote:I'm referring to the one who claimed hated p1.
and if he is killed by third party, THEN he is less hazardous.