Mini 1674: A Minimalist Text Adventure (Fire's Out)

Malakittens · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:12 am

In post 70, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In every game I have played/seen/read that NS has been a part of he has either lurked or been replaced.

I'll just kill him instead.

VOTE: Asher

Good what night will you be doing it? Also will it be you or your scum buddy doing the kill?

pieguyn · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:13 am

and I'm one of the people who can 100%-read notsci, yes.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:13 am

Vote: BBT

notty is one of the most easy to read players on the site, this policy is bollocks, You are scum.

pieguyn · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:13 am

SO MANY POSTS HOLY FUCK

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:13 am

In post 73, pieguyn wrote:
/meta'ing the player who hates meta

Lololololol. Please, meta me more.

Have I ever played with you?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:14 am

In post 75, Malakittens wrote:
Good what night will you be doing it? Also will it be you or your scum buddy doing the kill?

1st night. Low info kill, makes sense.

I'll do it. Personal satisfaction and all that.

In post 77, Sakura Hana wrote:
Vote: BBT

notty is one of the most easy to read players on the site, this policy is bollocks, You are scum.

Forming counter-wagon to Asher. Noted.

Soren · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:14 am

In post 70, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In every game I have played/seen/read that NS has been a part of he has either lurked or been replaced.

I'll just kill him instead.

VOTE: Asher

I'm not understanding the change in mindset.

Malakittens · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:15 am

Omigod. I forgot SAKURA. Add her into the list too!

pieguyn · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:15 am

In post 74, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It's more to do with you making a soft defence of me when I don't think you have played enough with me to be able to say that.

AK needs to have played a fuckton of games with you to have a general idea of how you play? even if this was true (which it's not - I figured out how you generally play after so much as seeing one game where you were town and one where you were scum), you don't have to have experience with someone to defend them.

while I think AK might be scum (and probably not scum with you), it's not for that.

vote: BBT

Soren · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:16 am

In post 80, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 75, Malakittens wrote:
Good what night will you be doing it? Also will it be you or your scum buddy doing the kill?

1st night. Low info kill, makes sense.

I'll do it. Personal satisfaction and all that.

In post 77, Sakura Hana wrote:
Vote: BBT

notty is one of the most easy to read players on the site, this policy is bollocks, You are scum.

Forming counter-wagon to Asher. Noted.

Nah this contradicts what you say in 36

Asher Kendrell · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:17 am

Forgive the new guy here, but what's the difference between meta and policy?

Soren · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:17 am

BBT is weird as hell right now.

VOTE: BBT

pieguyn · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:18 am

In post 79, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Have I ever played with you?

also, to answer this more explicitly, I was in GotG2 as Walpurgisnacht even though I disappeared after D1. we have no completed games beyond that except I replaced you in the pokemon upick.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:18 am

VOTE: BBT

Cheekier than Nandos

Sakura Hana · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:19 am

In post 85, Asher Kendrell wrote:Forgive the new guy here, but what's the difference between meta and policy?

Meta is using pervious experience with a player to define their alignment.
policy is more of a you want to lynch a player because they'll be a problem and anti-town regardless of alignment so you want to weed em out first.

I don't really like the practice of policy, there's WotO and WotC and so many other options that can be used instead, and also BBT's supposed policy of notty is faulty.

pieguyn · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:20 am

In post 85, Asher Kendrell wrote:Forgive the new guy here, but what's the difference between meta and policy?

meta = how someone generally plays
policy = lynching someone based entirely on playstyle reasons, or being a liability when town, as opposed to how they're actually playing in the game

now, for you. you ask me if I think you're scum, but don't take any further interest beyond that in *why*?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:20 am

He needs to have played more than one game, yes.

Especially a game where he was scum and would therefore not be paying much attention to working me out.

I bet you haven't even come close to figuring me out Pie.

Asher Kendrell · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:21 am

In post 89, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 85, Asher Kendrell wrote:Forgive the new guy here, but what's the difference between meta and policy?

Meta is using pervious experience with a player to define their alignment.
policy is more of a you want to lynch a player because they'll be a problem and anti-town regardless of alignment so you want to weed em out first.

I don't really like the practice of policy, there's WotO and WotC and so many other options that can be used instead, and also BBT's supposed policy of notty is faulty.

So in both cases, you use previous experience with a certain player to determine how they're going to act/if they're going to be a problem?

Soren · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:21 am

In post 88, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: BBT

Cheekier than Nandos

This gave me a good laugh.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:22 am

In post 92, Asher Kendrell wrote:
In post 89, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 85, Asher Kendrell wrote:Forgive the new guy here, but what's the difference between meta and policy?

Meta is using pervious experience with a player to define their alignment.
policy is more of a you want to lynch a player because they'll be a problem and anti-town regardless of alignment so you want to weed em out first.

I don't really like the practice of policy, there's WotO and WotC and so many other options that can be used instead, and also BBT's supposed policy of notty is faulty.

So in both cases, you use previous experience with a certain player to determine how they're going to act/if they're going to be a problem?

Well yes, but the difference is that in the former you can tell their alignment and in the later you can't tell their alignment and you don't care because they'll be a problem/liability regardless. pie explained it better than me actually.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:25 am

Also tbh, when i read the first page i was about to come yelling at you all for spreading your votes everywhere during RVS, but this turned out better than i expected as i got a scumread without the need to participate in RVS.
On the other reads: pie town, soren maybe town, everyone else is still null.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:25 am

So...not many reads then?

Sakura Hana · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:26 am

In post 96, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:So...not many reads then?

Pretty much, what else were you expecting?

pieguyn · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:26 am

In post 91, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:He needs to have played more than one game, yes.

Especially a game where he was scum and would therefore not be paying much attention to working me out.

false. playing against someone's town game as scum is, in my experience, actually one of the best ways to figure them out - you know they're town and can better pick up on various patterns or idiosyncrasies in their town game as a result.

regardless of this, you don't have to have a *really* good idea of how someone plays to defend them. what exactly do you think is scummy there?

Bins · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:26 am