*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
|
In post 477, RadiantCowbells wrote:I would note that my vote is still on BBT.
In post 483, The Bulge wrote:I don't think notscience/Cho/pieguy are all town but give me a bit to sort out which of you is scum.
In post 485, Cho wrote:In post 483, The Bulge wrote:I don't think notscience/Cho/pieguy are all town but give me a bit to sort out which of you is scum.
Why us three in particular? Why not, say, notscience/notscience/notscience?
In post 465, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Her points for Soren scum are pretty good.
In post 336, Huntress wrote:81 and 84, I can't believe you really thought BBT was saying he could make the scum nk so these posts don't make sense and look like you were just trying to find things against him. I actually thought you were joking when I read 84 but the vote in 86 implies you weren't.
In post 471, The Bulge wrote:But this fluffposting is Soren's town-game as well. Nothing else has pinged me about him so far, so he's just a null at this point.
In post 488, pieguyn wrote:In post 471, The Bulge wrote:But this fluffposting is Soren's town-game as well. Nothing else has pinged me about him so far, so he's just a null at this point.
have you seen Soren's scum game?
bc his play here sure as hell isn't it
In post 487, pieguyn wrote:In post 465, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Her points for Soren scum are pretty good.
don't really agree with this. the only point there I think potentially holds any water is this one:
In post 336, Huntress wrote:81 and 84, I can't believe you really thought BBT was saying he could make the scum nk so these posts don't make sense and look like you were just trying to find things against him. I actually thought you were joking when I read 84 but the vote in 86 implies you weren't.
but that by itself really isn't strong enough to make me scum read him. the rest are points that I don't particularly think are scummy - for example, I think she is misinterpreting what Soren is saying about notsci having to be replaced. if you look at what actually happened in the game, Soren willfully replaced out bc he claimed his RL was busy (then came back later and said he would have been fine if he stayed in the game), whereas notsci had flaked for a large portion of D2. when Soren was in the game he was fairly active, and he was clearly mindful of how lurking would harm the game. so calling Soren out for hypocrisy there is incorrect
it's essentially the same as what I've been saying this whole time: Soren's questions/what he's been saying in general so far this game haven't actually been pointless. so, meh.
In post 440, BlankFace wrote:"[Pie] seems determined to go for someone at least, which seems off."
Can you go into more detail about that please.
In post 441, BlankFace wrote:How do you feel about Cowbell's unvote of BBT? How do you feel about the way that Cho has responded to the questions that NS and I have asked? What about Huntresses 4 posts are giving you scum vibes?
"Spoiler: NotScience
Basically all he's said is in 313, not a lot since then. Most of that was one word/sentence responses too, which didn't really help. Agree on the non-scumread on BBT, but I don't know if that's right either. In any case, he missed a lot yesterday so neutral"
If you have BBT as town, why do you said that you don't know if it's right here?
