Open 598: GAME OVER

[lane0168]

I don't care if you sign or not. I worry about it

[lane0168]

Ok I'm done not talking to newbie

[lane0168]

don't worry about it I meant

[lane0168]

Lane is probtown

Another solid post. Your mouth says one thing. Your vote is saying another. Sthar8 jumps straight onto my wagon without saying anything, then says I'm probtown after a couple other people say I could be town. But doesn't do anything with the vote?

Does anyone know this person?
VOTE: sthar8

[BBmolla]

thats a pretty garbage vote lane.

[Newbie]

You don't agree that him saying Lane is probably town while not doing anything to change his vote is pretty scummy?

[lane0168]

Ok. So don't copy it

[BBmolla]

You don't agree that him saying Lane is probably town while not doing anything to change his vote is pretty scummy?

I think it's sthar being lazy.

[BBmolla]

And I think voting for it is semantics bullshit

If sthar was like "Lane is town but I'm going to keep voting him" then your point is valid.

[BBmolla]

If he had specified it I mean. His vote seemed like RVS I wouldn't be surprised if he forgot who he was voting.

[lane0168]

His vote wasnt rvs

[lane0168]

He followed people on it, and is hopping off just as quick

[Green Crayons]

@BB:

I sign up 100% with your plan.

I also unilaterally appoint you to match up the players who are to target other players.

[Green Crayons]

Oh wait I just read the part where we no lynch today.

Ew gross. Do we have to?

[BBmolla]

Oh wait I just read the part where we no lynch today.

Ew gross. Do we have to?

We don't "have to" but in theory if we do the plan while lynching we can auto lose. (5 die, 4 by PGOs and 1 by night kill, going in 2:2 day where town loses.)

So up to you.

[BBmolla]

He followed people on it, and is hopping off just as quick

or he thinks youre town after recent posts and forgot his vote was on you

[BBmolla]

I'm arguing because I know I've done that before and dealt with people spouting bullshit like you and Newbie.

[Persivul]

Oh wait I just read the part where we no lynch today.

Whaaaaat?

[BBmolla]

Oh wait I just read the part where we no lynch today.

Ew gross. Do we have to?

We don't "have to" but in theory if we do the plan while lynching we can auto lose. (5 die, 4 by PGOs and 1 by night kill, going in 2:2 day where town loses.)

So up to you.

[lane0168]

Riiighgghhhhttttt..... well that was dumb of you too and you deserve to deal with bullshit if you're gonna be that lazy

[Newbie]

Okay...you can't blame people for seeing such an action as scummy. The reason you don't is because you've done something similar yourself while being town. Maybe not all of us have that same experience.

[Newbie]

UNVOTE: lane

[BBmolla]

Not my fault you guys think people can be scum for semantics.

[Green Crayons]

@YGS:

1.

I answered your bad question. You're either not reading or 'see above'.

You can be suspicious of somebody without thinking they're scum. This is obvious. I feel you should know this.

This head of yours continues to be suspicious and obtuse.

You see that bolded part?

It's beside the entire point of the question I'm asking.

You keep focusing on "suspicious v. scummy" as if that's something that actually matters.

Congrats, I'm not moving my vote for the time being. Stop making issues out of things that aren't even issues in order to avoid answering a pretty simple question.

2.

@ GC: 'if you accept that lane thinks both ika and YGS are suspicious, but not necessarily buddies, why are you having a problem with lane voting YGS and simply vocally supporting ika votes (what actually happened) rather than voting ika and vocally supporting YGS votes (what you appear to be suggesting to be the non-suspicious thing to do)?'

I think you are asking why we have a problem with why lane's vote is bad WHILE he is scum-reading our slot? I think the question I just asked him explains that: he's not really established a reason behind his read on us, but would rather scum-read us than see our vote as town voting ika for the same reasons he 'suspects' them. Seems like he's reaching. Does that answer your question?

At least this head is attempting.

You're still not getting the point of my question.

And I find it pretty hard to believe that my question was obtuse, as Newbie answered it perfectly fine.

Here, let me rephrase by quoting you:

Lane, if you thought both us and ika were scum, why would you not vote for the bigger wagon?

Why compliment wagon on player you're scum reading and then vote elsewhere?

It makes no sense.

In Post 34, lane voiced support of ika wagon and voted YGS.

YES, LET'S ACCEPT THAT THIS IS LANE SAYING THAT HE THINKS BOTH IKA AND YGS ARE SCUM AND/OR SUSPICIOUS. (Jesus I can't believe I'm tying that again.)

HERE'S THE QUESTION: Why is lane voting YGS and voicing support of the ika wagon vote worthy if lane thinks

both

YGS and ika are scum? What's wrong with voting YGS-scum over ika-scum if lane thinks that both are scum?

[Green Crayons]

Well, I'm reread and rethinking 94 and I guess it does answer my question.