Open 598: GAME OVER

ika · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:18 am

scum reside in ZZZX/TGS/Newbie

thats where i stand right now

Green Crayons · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:19 am

In post 95, ZZZX wrote:I am really busy for 3 days but it shouldnt be a problem. will read up really soon (and i will have limitless free time !)

This is scum?

lane0168 · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:22 am

In post 276, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 95, ZZZX wrote:I am really busy for 3 days but it shouldnt be a problem. will read up really soon (and i will have limitless free time !)

This is scum?

If you replace "really" with "scum". It becomes more obvious

ika · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:24 am

In post 276, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 95, ZZZX wrote:I am really busy for 3 days but it shouldnt be a problem. will read up really soon (and i will have limitless free time !)

This is scum?

do you think its not?

i mean hes null to me right now so is in my POE pool

Green Crayons · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:25 am

It's null to me.

Unless if he is posting elsewhere on the site?

POE makes sense though.

Newbie · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:25 am

In post 271, Persivul wrote:
In post 261, Newbie wrote:
My current scum reads are ika, Persivul, GC, and sthar.

VOTE: Persivul

Excluding ZZZX who is on V/LA, your scum reads are the four players (excluding yourself) with the lowest post counts.

I've heard on here that effort is not indicative of alignment. Do you disagree? Is this just coincidence?

I'm pretty sure GC doesn't have low post count. He's actually one of the more active players.

Effort can be indicative of alignment when accompanied with scummy posts. Is that all you have to say? Nothing about my vote on you?

Persivul · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:38 am

In post 280, Newbie wrote:
I'm pretty sure GC doesn't have low post count. He's actually one of the more active players.

He was fourth from the bottom excluding you and ZZZX when I made that post, though now he's caught up with BBM.

Effort can be indicative of alignment when accompanied with scummy posts.

I'd say scummy posts are indicative of alignment regardless of effort.

Is that all you have to say? Nothing about my vote on you?

Not really. I think your charges have been way over the top so far. It's my understanding that making associatives before a flip is an exercise in futility, but you don't seem to have a problem with it.

Newbie · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:46 am

I mean, I don't have a problem with using associative flips as a strategy at times, but what does that have to do with my vote on you?

Persivul · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 7:59 am

In post 282, Newbie wrote:I mean, I don't have a problem with using associative flips as a strategy at times, but what does that have to do with my vote on you?

Point is that since you're just voting on shit I'm not real concerned about it.

Persivul · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:01 am

In post 278, ika wrote:
In post 276, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 95, ZZZX wrote:I am really busy for 3 days but it shouldnt be a problem. will read up really soon (and i will have limitless free time !)

This is scum?

do you think its not?

i mean hes null to me right now so is in my POE pool

Are you saying ZZZX went from scum in one post to null in the next?

Persivul · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:08 am

BTW, I've gotten shit for wagon hopping when, without any vote counts, I didn't know a wagon existed. I'll keep track in the future. If someone has a current one can you post it?

Newbie · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:09 am

So I guess I'll be keeping my vote then.

Persivul · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:11 am

In post 251, Green Crayons wrote:
Get a new/fix the setup if the setup is boring because town can attempt to come together and try to strategize night actions.

Pushing for less than optimal town play because it's boring is anti-town, pro-scum.

Just talking about optimal town play (as opposed to presenting a plan that will actually work) is anti-town because it takes the focus off the scum hunt. Regardless of the propriety of it, you should at least think it through and make sure it would work before presenting the plan. And yes, I realize I got caught up in it for a bit too.

Persivul · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:17 am

In post 242, You Got Schooled wrote:Need to see more from Sthar.

VOTE: Persivul

If you need to see more from

Sthar

, maybe you should put a vote on him.

Persivul · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:31 am

268

That's the most substantive observation to date.

VOTE: BBmolla

snscompt1 · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:32 am

VOTECOUNT 1.03

Jeanne11(0):

Newbie(1):

BBmolla,

ika(0)

:

lane0168(1):

sthar8,

sthar8(1):

lane0168,

ZZZX(0):

You Got Schooled(1):

Green Crayons,

BBmolla(1):

Persivul

Persivul(2):

You Got Schooled, Newbie,

Green Crayons(0):

Not Voting:

Jeanne11, ika, ZZZX,

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch

Deadline is May 30. 10:40 PM EST

(expired on 2015-05-30 22:40:00)

Jeanne11 has picked up her role, yet has not confirmed or posted. Will find a replacement in 7 hours from this post.

lane0168 · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:41 am

In post 289, Persivul wrote:268

That's the most substantive observation to date.

VOTE: BBmolla

Wtf? This makes my head hurt. What's with the vote?

Persivul · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:46 am

In post 291, lane0168 wrote:
In post 289, Persivul wrote:268

That's the most substantive observation to date.

VOTE: BBmolla

Wtf? This makes my head hurt. What's with the vote?

It's obvious - suggesting a no lynch in order to prevent mafia from using their PGO is scummy. I'm sure mafia would be quite content with just their NK if no one's being lynched.

You Got Schooled · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:53 am

lane0168 wrote:The vote was the say canyons again cause he seemed upset by it. The reasoning was mimicking him. Sufficient?

I believe this. Lane is a meanie

lane0168 wrote:Also @sthar8. I'm mobile. both my laptops are broken. Just played a whole game mobile, granted it was 2 days. Either way, it's not that tough to tag mobile. or read. Or give reads. And don't call me a dipshit cause you can't find the [, ], and / button on your phone. And haven't contributed dick. That doesn't make me the dipshit

+1 to this. Pretty much everything about their posting felt off. However, @BBM: I understand what you are saying about his vote, but it was more the motivation for it. If sthar flips scum, we're coming back to this.

lane0168 wrote:
In post 216, You Got Schooled wrote:92 - Quick note on the attempt at game breaking; can we not do that?

Thanks.

Agreed. If that's happening let me know and I'll think about replacing out

@GC, you say in post 246 this attitude is scummy, but you realise that it's not just the YGS slot that feels that way? Why is this only a problem for our slot?

Green Crayons wrote:I'm taking your bad argument to it's logical conclusion.

This is strawmanning and terrible, jsyk.

Green Crayons wrote:The plan and the no lynch was in two separate posts.

Unlike what you say in 258.

I don't mind the fact you missed it. I can even believe it. What is scummy is how you tried to paint us in a bad light for it, without checking yourself first.

ika wrote:scum reside in ZZZX/TGS/Newbie

thats where i stand right now

Okay, why? This is your second reads-list with no explanation.

Green Crayons wrote:It's null to me.

Unless if he is posting elsewhere on the site?

POE makes sense though.

Fence sit more...

tldr: Bella is getting scum vibes from GC.
-Bella

p-edit,

Persivul.

ika · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:54 am

In post 284, Persivul wrote:
In post 278, ika wrote:
In post 276, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 95, ZZZX wrote:I am really busy for 3 days but it shouldnt be a problem. will read up really soon (and i will have limitless free time !)

This is scum?

do you think its not?

i mean hes null to me right now so is in my POE pool

Are you saying ZZZX went from scum in one post to null in the next?

did i ever say he was a scum read?

Persivul · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:57 am

@YGS: Well what did you mean by it then?

Persivul · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 8:58 am

In post 294, ika wrote:

did i ever say he was a scum read?

Yes, in 275

Persivul · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 9:01 am

In post 291, lane0168 wrote:

This makes my head hurt.

Tell me about it. I feel like I'm speaking a different language from the rest of you.

You Got Schooled · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 9:08 am

Persivul, the eye roll was a) our vote was there before we moved it to you, so your comment is odd and b) your vote is kinda terrible. I don't really understand your explanation. Your poke at ika looks better, though.

-bella

lane0168 · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Mon May 18, 2015 9:10 am

In post 275, ika wrote:scum reside in ZZZX/TGS/Newbie

thats where i stand right now

You're not really standing anywhere. More like hovering around in nowhere land especially if you're not scum reading someone who you think could be scum.

Talk is cheap, that's why there's no limit on posting.

Votes are valuable, that's why you only get one. If you're standing anywhere, I feel it should be where your vote is. Unless you don't have a vote, then you don't have a stance

@persivul, I think bBBM suggested no lynch to avoid a night 1 loss in the case that we mislynch and both of the targeted are scum