In post 2473, RadiantCowbells wrote:
And yeah, I could post reasons. But then I'd get "oh that's not a real scumtell / that's not alignment indicative / if x is scum it's not for those reasons."
Then they'll flip scum.
Then next game I'll post a case on similar rationale and get "oh that's not a real scumtell / that's not alignment indicative / if x is scum it's not for those reasons."
At some point you learn better.
Seriously, I'm confused as to why you play if you refuse to participate. Believe me, I understand being reluctant to post a case on someone because other's tell you that your read is wrong because of blah, blah, whatever. You have to look at the source though. If you scum read player A and give 3 reasons and player A tells you that's not a scum tell/not alignment indicative/whatever, maybe it's because they are scummy and have no way to refute your case. If someone else other than player A tells you stuff like that, you have to consider if that player is a scum mate with player A or if the points you made are not valid.
Bottom line, if you are town you want to help town win. By pointing out things you think make player A scummy, you help the rest of town determine if player A is scum. You might just see something that everyone else missed.