In post 193, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Your reversal on the Plot read happened quickly. Really quickly.
Incorrect. I said his honesty read towny to me. I did not say, he's firmly in my town pool. He's nullish for me right now.
In post 193, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Your reversal on the Plot read happened quickly. Really quickly.
In post 196, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Really???
In post 197, Shinobi wrote:And?
In post 167, Thor665 wrote:I am also annoyed that you dodged my request to show me where he admitted to being wrong in the meta - as you claimed he did.
Really?
In post 202, Lapsa wrote:In post 196, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Really???
mad skills
and please don't do 'will post tonight' fillers anymore. hate them
In post 197, Shinobi wrote:And?
and that catches your point of interest
In post 201, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Alright, I just skimmed the past page or so because I'm not reading those walls.
Town reading CB, Zoro, Fro99er,Plot, & Tex. In that order.
Thor is tunneling which makes it difficult to get a read on him. Need some more posts from Shinobi to develop a read, same for CD.
Will voteAbuse, Math, Lapsa orToolToday.
VOTE: Math
In post 193, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why wait so long to place the vote? You posted a few times (3?) after his oh so scummy 67, why the vote now?
In post 201, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Alright, I just skimmed the past page or so because I'm not reading those walls.
Town reading CB, Zoro, Fro99er, Plot, & Tex. In that order.
Thor is tunneling which makes it difficult to get a read on him. Need some more posts from Shinobi to develop a read, same for CD.
Will vote Abuse, Math, Lapsa or Tool Today.
VOTE: Math
In post 203, Zoronos wrote:He claimed he was wrong about his read on Frogger entirely, which by implication means he thinks he was wrong about his meta read. He changed his mind and thought Frogger was town. It's in post 57. I linked it twice. I wasn't dodging your request, I'm getting frustrated because it feels like you're nitpicking. But whatever.
In post 203, Zoronos wrote:You said in 93, which I quoted back to you to make sure I understood, that the case was because he was confused.
In post 203, Zoronos wrote:If he were still voting or scum reading Frogger in any capacity, yeah, agree with you. But he's not, he's town reading him.
If he ever comes around back to that Frogger read and uses the meta or day start stuff, I'll be right there with you.
In post 207, Zoronos wrote:(I agree on Thor. I'm trying to break him out of the tunnel, but it's hard.)
In post 209, Thor665 wrote:I instigated this discussion, not you.
In post 211, Thor665 wrote:Then please address 208.
I'll save pointing out that I'm not tunneling to other people - I'm tired of people mistaking a push with a tunnel and not grokking the difference.
In post 171, Thor665 wrote:In post 169, Thor665 wrote:Why are you not addressing the people who have claimed this as par for the course from him?
@Mathdino
Also, as someone who went and researched Frogger...why didn't you research Lapsa?
Because a very mild Lapsa research quest will show multiple games where people pointed out that his playstyle was poison, and him sticking to it regardless, and him being town in the end. So...yeah.
I'm calling BS on this. If you were the sort of person to research Frogger why would you not research Lapsa? You're scum who is faking his work.
In post 188, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 15, Mathdino wrote:Wouldn't that be a reasonnotto vote him? Sympathy...? Whatever.
Anyway are you just voting whoever or are you purposefully voting with me?
Math, why did you choose Plot as opposed to any of the players who were voting you?
In post 42, Mathdino wrote:
Frogger why no vote? Also, reads?
Plotinus, reads on Frogger so far then?
Froggers over defencive response is kinda reinforcing my read right now considering he just made a point that his scumhunting will show he's town, not his meta.
You're trying too hard here. I'm surprised Fro99er even responded with reads, you would have got 'lol, page 2' from me.
Since when is being defensive a scum tell? What is the problem with the scum hunting comment?
In post 216, Mathdino wrote:and then proceeded to make a bunch of overdefencive posts that contain 0 scumhunting and all defence
In post 192, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 58, Mathdino wrote:Alright looking back I think texcat's suspicions and questioning seem not-really-scumhunty and forced. The backing off thing she claimed tool did is stretchy too.
VOTE: texcat
Yo texcat, could you explain what you wanted to get out of the question you asked Plotinus on reading Frogger? Did you find it scummy or were you trying to clarify, or...?
Dislike this vote. I thought Tex's vote and reasoning were pretty decent for that point in the game.
In post 90, Mathdino wrote:
abuse has actually stepped into scumread from this past conversation. He seems to be doing a lot of "arguing that people are wrong" and not much of "arguing people are scum". He starts what amounts to a useless semantics debate with Shinobi and (correct me if I'm wrong) spent a page arguing that Plotinus's vote 'looks bad' and not 'scummy'.
@abuse, what are your scumreads? What's your read on Plotinus? Shinobi? Lapsa?
UNVOTE: texcat
VOTE: Lapsa
FoS: abuse
Edit: @BBT: JP Mafia all over again, eh? Now you know how I felt
Where did the scum read on Tex go?
Why are you voting Lapsa over abuse?
Can you clarify what your last comment means? It feels like you're talking to me as if you know I'm town...