Juls 84 wrote:@RC - which of these 'fools' are scummy cause what I see is an RVS vote on Vi despite 'stuff' happening.
I didn't think it would need to have been said, but that was tongue in cheek. Allow me to explain the joke to you: The implication was that all players in this game would be killed except for myself and ABR. This would then produce a town victory. Given the absurdity of making such prediction, one may be able to find humor in how ridiculous it is. Regrettably, that was lost on you.
Passive aggressive comment of the day: I will heed Sal and Juls' requests that I button down and not breach rules of propriety for the remainder of the game. I will rigorously adhere to the serious business of Mafia and not do anything that may be construed as too jovial, fun-spirited or otherwise not conducive to catching scum.
---
Vi 91 wrote:I do, however, believe that Salamence is Town enough at this time that he should not be the focus of your investigation or vote. (By implication, your case and line of questioning does not shake my belief in Salamence-Town.)
I disagree with this sentiment. I do not think this position is helpful to the town as it discourages scumhunting. Additionally, I do not think you ought to speak on Sal's behalf. Thus, I have not seen the need to move my vote.
---
Q's
92 reads as town, though I wish it were more aggressive.
---
SK 97 wrote:It was funny though.
Sal 99 wrote:RC is a reapercharlie alt?
It was funny, but since I am not allowed to ever venture into what Sal/Juls may consider "fluff" territory, I can only advise Vi that given that I registered on the website prior to ReaperCharlie, and given that he has received the forementioned ban years ago, I dispute the idea that he should claim said initials prior to myself.
---
Sal 111 wrote:RC claimed that people told him he posts too much. I said he is lying, then asked him who says that.
I did not make this claim. As I have advised you, I implore you to go back and reread the initial claim I made as opposed to spouting mistruths.
Sal 112 wrote:Ok, so I misread the post because Im dyslexic. The basis of it is wrong, but it still doesnt change my thoughts of RC scum.
While I can appreciate this, elaboration on this read is in order. I contend that this doesn't answer SK's question.
---
SK 119 wrote:Strong push.
This is also funny, but since I am not allowed to ever venture into what Sal/Juls may consider "fluff" territory, I will only comment that there is a logical point against vez that is implied here as well.
