In post 129, Plum wrote:In post 65, Quaroath wrote:Sal, I really don't like the content (or lack thereof) for your posts.... 29 has you making excuses for a pretty useless post. I doubt that you'd get modkilled just for saying it was a serious vote that demands pressure. That's just a weak excuse. Mind you I have zero clue about your meta, but it's hard to imagine saying a vote is serious as being modkillable.
So confused. So many other more useless posts here. Taking the Salamance explanation way more seriously than it was intended (???). Anyway, Quaroath, why didn't you vote Salamance in post 65? The whole post feels a little weird to me, to be honest. It's worded like a case, really, inasmuch as it's dissecting multiple posts from Salamance to demonstrate scumminess, with questions more rhetorical than inquisitive. But it tries to avoidbeinga case - no vote on Salamance, no strong suggestion that the anomalies discussed are scummy per se . . . it's odd. It's definitely content in a bulk seen little to that point in the game, but to what end? Also, while I'm here:
In post 92, Quaroath wrote:In post 80, vezokpiraka wrote:I don't want to vote rc right now.
Who DO you want to vote? It seems like you don't want to participate at all.
Weird to ask someone who's still on his RVS vote this while you're still voting your RVS vote and no instances of you using the term "scum" yourself in your whole ISO. Like, yes, Vezok has contributed less content, I guess, but . . . not really like this.
Yeah I get this Plum, so it's a good question on both parts. Frankly, I wasn't sure where I'd go with Sal and I didn't feel it was worth shepherding around votes at the time. I had questions, and I didn't think about it. Shitty answer I know, but hey there it is.
As far as vez... I asked vez because his only comment at that time was that he didn't want to vote RC. Like.. really.. you feel you need to SAY you don't want to vote someone? What's the point of that? It's just wasted space and fluff posting. If vez has posted literally ANYTHING that wasn't "Don't feel like voting for (playername) I'd have not asked the question. He was very inactive in the game and barely had any non pure fluff content. This is bascially the same state he's in now. He's a wagon sheep and distraction.
Hey, RC mentions this too! (Plums post I mean)
Those last two are prime grade PEACH quality.:
In post 241, vezokpiraka wrote:In post 240, RedCoyote wrote:vez, can't find a wagon that suits you?
Sk is the wagon I want. Plum was a wagon that formed grew and I plum is also a scumread..
In post 243, vezokpiraka wrote:Yeah I brainfarted.
What I mean is that Plum is y second scum read and when I saw the wagon on her grow and the one SK do nothing I decided to switch.
This makes no sense to me. You are moving from one wagon that just broke down on a scum read to your other scum read (okay I get that part) without saying why - all game - why they are your scumreads? Are you just tunneling these two?
I don't feel like an SK wagon is getting far right now, just a general vibe I think the thread supports. If Plum is a scum read, why aren't you trying to revive the wagon there? Ya know... make a case for your belief and try to get people to vote for your suspect. Cause your' doing really poorly at that right now.
In your second post of the game, you said they were a team. Why do you care who goes first, if that's true?
All you are doing is wagon hopping, or storing your vote on a target that isn't a viable wagon at the moment. Why are you hiding?
If you have this great read on SK, share it cause... unless you do I don't think it's going anywhere right now and if you are town you are just wasting valuable time. If you are scum, you are trying to wait out the day without making waves.
VOTE: vezok
