MINI 1688 — BEES!!! — game over


User avatar
Marquis
Marquis
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Marquis
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11342
Joined: June 23, 2013
Location: EST (–5)

Post Post #1475 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 10:24 am

Post by Marquis »



Image

(expired on 2015-07-04 21:30:00)

(Sat Jul 4 @ 9:30:00 PM EST)


VOTECOUNT 3.01
  • (0)
    BBmolla

    (0)
    ChaosOmega

    (0)
    Fro99er

    (0)
    Metal Sonic

    (0)
    Green Crayons

    (1)
    KayP
    BBmolla
    (0)
    SleepyKrew

    (1)
    lalaladucks
    Not_Mafia
    (2)
    Not_Mafia
    lalaladucks, Metal Sonic

    (5)
    (NOT VOTING)
    ChaosOmega, Fro99er, SleepyKrew, Green Crayons, KayP

    With
    9
    alive
    , it takes
    5
    votes
    to lynch.


    Awaiting prod response from: N/A
Last edited by Marquis on Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
link in bio
User avatar
lalaladucks
lalaladucks
a study in thread
User avatar
User avatar
lalaladucks
a study in thread
a study in thread
Posts: 4082
Joined: February 25, 2015

Post Post #1476 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:07 pm

Post by lalaladucks »

In post 1461, Metal Sonic wrote:oh hey, GC, you're here

lala also claimed 'backup IC'

do the scum not have fakeclaims or something? wtf

In post 1465, Fro99er wrote:All day work meeting so I'll be online tonight, but not a big fan of the NK speculation. A bunch of WIFOM.

Ducky, can you clarify the twilight deal. Are you VT or Backup IC?

Don't really see NM as scum...he actually came to the defense of SKrew when the other wagon besides NM was...SKrew. I mean, that would be pretty ballsy.

In post 1468, KayP wrote:Uhh.

Ducks claimed Backup IC, too... so it's not just about SleepyKrew lying at this point or whether he's telling the truth, it's about whether there are THREE backup ICs in this game?

That seems like a stretch. After reading, I could sort of buy the argument that two backup ICs and no actual IC would be a funny setup for the mod to use, but three of them in a normal seems very excessive...

I don't know which of ducks or SleepyKrew would be more likely to be lying, though.

In post 1474, Not_Mafia wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 1470, Green Crayons wrote:
@NM:
In light of:
In post 1433, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1303, Marquis wrote:
VOTECOUNT 2.19
(0)
BBmolla

(0)
ChaosOmega

(0)
Fro99er

(0)
Metal Sonic

(0)
Green Crayons

(0)
KayP

(2)
SleepyKrew
EspeciallyTheLies, Fro99er
(0)
lalaladucks

(1)
RedCoyote
Not_Mafia
(5)
Not_Mafia
KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, Metal Sonic, Green Crayons
(L-1)

(0)
EspeciallyTheLies


(0)
(NO LYNCH)


(3)
(NOT VOTING)
SleepyKrew, lalaladucks, BBmolla

In post 1377, Marquis wrote:
VOTECOUNT 2.20
(0)
BBmolla

(0)
ChaosOmega

(0)
Fro99er

(0)
Metal Sonic

(0)
Green Crayons

(0)
KayP

(0)
SleepyKrew

(1)
lalaladucks
Not_Mafia
(5)
RedCoyote
EspeciallyTheLies, lalaladucks, BBmolla, Green Crayons, Fro99er
(L-1)

(4)
Not_Mafia
KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, Metal Sonic
(L-2)

(0)
EspeciallyTheLies


(0)
(NO LYNCH)


(1)
(NOT VOTING)
SleepyKrew

With
11
alive
, it takes
6
votes
to lynch.

In post 1423, Marquis wrote:
VOTECOUNT 2.21
(0)
BBmolla

(0)
ChaosOmega

(0)
Fro99er

(0)
Metal Sonic

(0)
Green Crayons

(0)
KayP

(0)
SleepyKrew

(0)
lalaladucks

(6)
RedCoyote
EspeciallyTheLies, lalaladucks, BBmolla, Green Crayons, Fro99er, Not_Mafia
(L-0)

(4)
Not_Mafia
KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, Metal Sonic
(L-2)

(0)
EspeciallyTheLies


(0)
(NO LYNCH)


(1)
(NOT VOTING)
SleepyKrew

With
11
alive
, it takes
6
votes
to lynch.


I'm all ears about your theory why you were not lynched yesterday.

Because to me it looks like scum didn't want to lynch you yesterday.


There wasn't really any clean opportunity for scum to hammer me yesterday, maybe they weren't around, maybe they saw me as more easily mislynchable in future days than RC
User avatar
lalaladucks
lalaladucks
a study in thread
User avatar
User avatar
lalaladucks
a study in thread
a study in thread
Posts: 4082
Joined: February 25, 2015

Post Post #1477 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:07 pm

Post by lalaladucks »

DARN TURDUGGETS
User avatar
lalaladucks
lalaladucks
a study in thread
User avatar
User avatar
lalaladucks
a study in thread
a study in thread
Posts: 4082
Joined: February 25, 2015

Post Post #1478 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:10 pm

Post by lalaladucks »

hit submit instead of preview...

In post 1476, lalaladucks wrote:
lala also claimed 'backup IC'

In post 1465, Fro99er wrote:
Ducky, can you clarify the twilight deal. Are you VT or Backup IC?

In post 1468, KayP wrote:
Ducks claimed Backup IC, too... so it's not just about SleepyKrew lying at this point or whether he's telling the truth, it's about whether there are THREE backup ICs in this game?

That seems like a stretch. After reading, I could sort of buy the argument that two backup ICs and no actual IC would be a funny setup for the mod to use, but three of them in a normal seems very excessive...

I don't know which of ducks or SleepyKrew would be more likely to be lying, though.


alright guys, um

I was

J
U
S
T
K
I
D
D
I
N
G
a
b
o
u
t
b
a
c
k
u
p
I
C
t
e
e
h
e
e


In post 1474, Not_Mafia wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 1470, Green Crayons wrote:
@NM:
In light of:
In post 1433, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1303, Marquis wrote:
VOTECOUNT 2.19
(0)
BBmolla

(0)
ChaosOmega

(0)
Fro99er

(0)
Metal Sonic

(0)
Green Crayons

(0)
KayP

(2)
SleepyKrew
EspeciallyTheLies, Fro99er
(0)
lalaladucks

(1)
RedCoyote
Not_Mafia
(5)
Not_Mafia
KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, Metal Sonic, Green Crayons
(L-1)

(0)
EspeciallyTheLies


(0)
(NO LYNCH)


(3)
(NOT VOTING)
SleepyKrew, lalaladucks, BBmolla

In post 1377, Marquis wrote:
VOTECOUNT 2.20
(0)
BBmolla

(0)
ChaosOmega

(0)
Fro99er

(0)
Metal Sonic

(0)
Green Crayons

(0)
KayP

(0)
SleepyKrew

(1)
lalaladucks
Not_Mafia
(5)
RedCoyote
EspeciallyTheLies, lalaladucks, BBmolla, Green Crayons, Fro99er
(L-1)

(4)
Not_Mafia
KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, Metal Sonic
(L-2)

(0)
EspeciallyTheLies


(0)
(NO LYNCH)


(1)
(NOT VOTING)
SleepyKrew

With
11
alive
, it takes
6
votes
to lynch.

In post 1423, Marquis wrote:
VOTECOUNT 2.21
(0)
BBmolla

(0)
ChaosOmega

(0)
Fro99er

(0)
Metal Sonic

(0)
Green Crayons

(0)
KayP

(0)
SleepyKrew

(0)
lalaladucks

(6)
RedCoyote
EspeciallyTheLies, lalaladucks, BBmolla, Green Crayons, Fro99er, Not_Mafia
(L-0)

(4)
Not_Mafia
KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, Metal Sonic
(L-2)

(0)
EspeciallyTheLies


(0)
(NO LYNCH)


(1)
(NOT VOTING)
SleepyKrew

With
11
alive
, it takes
6
votes
to lynch.


I'm all ears about your theory why you were not lynched yesterday.

Because to me it looks like scum didn't want to lynch you yesterday.


There wasn't really any clean opportunity for scum to hammer me yesterday, maybe they weren't around, maybe they saw me as more easily mislynchable in future days than RC
[/quote]
well if I was scum I had a good opportunity, was there when you were at L-1, but it mostly seemed like a lurker lynch for Bulge's useless nothingness rather than actual scumminess
User avatar
lalaladucks
lalaladucks
a study in thread
User avatar
User avatar
lalaladucks
a study in thread
a study in thread
Posts: 4082
Joined: February 25, 2015

Post Post #1479 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:12 pm

Post by lalaladucks »

In post 1465, Fro99er wrote:
Don't really see NM as scum...he actually came to the defense of SKrew when the other wagon besides NM was...SKrew. I mean, that would be pretty ballsy.

He is.
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
User avatar
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
Smash Hit
Posts: 23540
Joined: February 5, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym

Post Post #1480 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:14 pm

Post by Not_Mafia »

I know you are but what am I
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
User avatar
Fro99er
Fro99er
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Fro99er
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16952
Joined: April 2, 2015

Post Post #1481 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:38 pm

Post by Fro99er »

VT/backup IC joke aside, Ducky is laying down the NK speculation WIFOM and the if "I was scum" WIFOM.

Ducky, since you think he's scum, why didn't you hammer him while you were there when he was at L-1?

VOTE: lalaladucks
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1482 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:06 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

call me crazy

but ducks ain't scum

I'm not really seeing who would match up with her*


In contrast, I think NM is scum

Final D2 VC had KayP, ChaosOmega, RedCoyote, and Metal Sonic voting NM. The only questionable townread I have in there is Kay. So I think NMs wagon was most likely all town.

Final D2 VC had EspeciallyTheLies, lalaladucks, BBmolla, Green Crayons, and Fro99er voting RC. ETL & GC are town. I'm thinking ducks is town. That leaves BBmolla and frogger as strong candidates for NM-scum's buddies. Which kinda makes sense when you look at their play.



* Wild theory: NM and ducks are on the same scum team


VOTE: NM
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1483 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:07 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1444, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 1436, Green Crayons wrote:NM, is BBmolla/Tammy/Bella scum?


Possibly, but they're not a priority

Explain "priority."
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
KayP
KayP
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KayP
Goon
Goon
Posts: 201
Joined: June 4, 2015

Post Post #1484 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:11 pm

Post by KayP »

In post 1482, Green Crayons wrote:* Wild theory: NM and ducks are on the same scum team


VOTE: NM

Err...so why vote NM over ducks?
Definitions are the guardians of rationality, the first line of defense against the chaos of mental disintegration.

~
Ayn Rand
~

I Stand With Rand!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1485 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:12 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

That's literally an outlandish theory that depends upon NM being scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1486 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:12 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Also

like

the remainder of my post?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
KayP
KayP
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KayP
Goon
Goon
Posts: 201
Joined: June 4, 2015

Post Post #1487 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:14 pm

Post by KayP »

Ah, I missed the footnote. My apologies.
Definitions are the guardians of rationality, the first line of defense against the chaos of mental disintegration.

~
Ayn Rand
~

I Stand With Rand!
User avatar
Fro99er
Fro99er
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Fro99er
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16952
Joined: April 2, 2015

Post Post #1488 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:15 pm

Post by Fro99er »

@GC - So you're saying NM was at L-1 as scum, and came to SKrew's defense while SKrew was the other wagon? I guess so.
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1489 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:18 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Also, NM's answer to why he wasn't the lynchee yesterday doesn't inspire confidence:

There wasn't really any clean opportunity for scum to hammer me yesterday,

Not true. NM was L-1 for a while. ducks even chose to not vote him.

maybe they weren't around,

Also not true. Everyone was voting by the end of yesterday except for SK.

maybe they saw me as more easily mislynchable in future days than RC

The best theory. It's a perhaps. But it's a theory that requires thinking scum went for the long game and actively chose to drum up ANOTHER town wagon to duel against the NM-town wagon.


Also, dang NM=scum just feels right in terms of how yesterday went down.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
User avatar
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
Smash Hit
Posts: 23540
Joined: February 5, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym

Post Post #1490 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:22 pm

Post by Not_Mafia »

Hammer at that time would have looked bad on lala

And by priority I mean I'm focusing on lala and KayP, who I'm more sure about for now

Leaning GC for final scum, I could see it being MS, his reason for scumreading makes 0 sense, but the way he's pushing me look town
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
User avatar
Fro99er
Fro99er
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Fro99er
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16952
Joined: April 2, 2015

Post Post #1491 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:22 pm

Post by Fro99er »

I don't know. GC, I see where you're coming from, but I don't see how it "feels right" given how yesterday went down.

I mean, I saw NM defend SKrew, and I've never played with scum!NM, but I can't see him doing that. Except in the case of SKrew being his scumbuddy as a last minute attempt to save SKrew. But, SKrew's claim makes sense given that Ducky claims she was just joking, so there goes the scum!NM + scum!SKrew idea.
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1492 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:23 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1488, Fro99er wrote:@GC - So you're saying NM was at L-1 as scum, and came to SKrew's defense while SKrew was the other wagon? I guess so.

I note the irony that I will be repeating what ETL said about SK's play: it's something scum would do to trick town into thinking that they are town, yes!

Here's the thing. The "defending" NM did was simply point out the most likely role setup scenario. NM-scum could have fought against it, but it's really a calculated risk. If enough people (like myself) bought into SK being town based on likely role setup, then it makes NM look really bad. In contrast, if enough people took it at face value - whether they thought it to be the correct role setup, and especially if they did not (such as ETL) - then NM looks really darn good! He's not fighting tooth and nail for folks to go after the competing bandwagon! Must be town!

But, all it is is NM just agreeing with what I believe is the actual role setup. That isn't a big defense of another player. It's simply acknowledging the situation that we are most likely working with, and so it isn't some Big Thing that NM did.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1493 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:23 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1491, Fro99er wrote:I saw NM defend SKrew, and I've never played with scum!NM,

I just got out of a game where NM-scum hardbussed his buddy D1 & D2.

Defending a town is not outside of the realm of NM-scum's play.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1494 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:24 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

If NM is town, I will be at a complete loss and will simply vote ducks because it's who NM wanted to lynch.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1495 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:25 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

(Or whoever else NM directs me to vote for.)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
User avatar
User avatar
Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
Smash Hit
Posts: 23540
Joined: February 5, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym

Post Post #1496 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:26 pm

Post by Not_Mafia »

And GC's hedging on lala scum and linking it to me looks like an excuse to still 'push' lala but gun for my lynch, and chain my lynch to a lala scumflip should my lynch fall through
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
User avatar
Fro99er
Fro99er
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Fro99er
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16952
Joined: April 2, 2015

Post Post #1497 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:27 pm

Post by Fro99er »

In post 1490, Not_Mafia wrote:Hammer at that time would have looked bad on lala

I KNOW! I believe she was afraid to hammer because you'd flip town. I mean, she said she didn't vote you because it was a Bulge lurker thing instead of a you scummy thing. Then suddenly after the NK you are scummy?

This is exactly why I hated her WIFOM about the NK.

Either she really is getting framed

or

She wanted ETL gone and then was the first to react to the NK claiming "I'm framed!" so she could find someone else to blame, you being the most logical
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1498 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:27 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

No

I just got out of a game where all three scum were arguing that the other three scum were scum

and therefore I fucked up LYLO and voted for a fourth candidate

that's where my paranoia is coming from w/r/t ducks

the only reason why ducks would be scum with NM-scum is because she refused to hammer you, but then immediately voted you today
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1499 (ISO) » Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:28 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1496, Not_Mafia wrote:And GC's hedging on lala scum and linking it to me looks like an excuse to still 'push' lala but gun for my lynch, and chain my lynch to a lala scumflip should my lynch fall through

also

this doesn't make sense

seeing as how I said I only see ducks as scum if you are scum

but if you are not scum, then I don't see ducks as scum

and would only vote ducks (if you are town) if your dying wish is for me to vote ducks tomorrow
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”