In post 1370, sangres wrote:In post 1289, Soft-spoken wrote:if we arnt lynching quil its RBD or or GB. im entirely agnostic when it comes to these 3
Why do you think GB could be scum?
Why not lynch pie?
do you have a scum read on me?
In post 1370, sangres wrote:In post 1289, Soft-spoken wrote:if we arnt lynching quil its RBD or or GB. im entirely agnostic when it comes to these 3
Why do you think GB could be scum?
Why not lynch pie?
In post 1113, sangres wrote:I don't have a particularly strong conviction that Quilford is scum, I think that I'm just mostly bothered by his play because it's annoying.
Muffin, why do you need Nati around to do things?
In post 1163, sangres wrote:quil why is bbmolla in the mid-tier?
In post 1307, sangres wrote:how many votes are on Quil
In post 1308, sangres wrote:looks like maybe 3. I was concerned he put himself at L-1.
In post 1376, Tammy wrote:
In post 1113, sangres wrote:I don't have a particularly strong conviction that Quilford is scum, I think that I'm just mostly bothered by his play because it's annoying.
Muffin, why do you need Nati around to do things?
In post 1163, sangres wrote:quil why is bbmolla in the mid-tier?
In post 1307, sangres wrote:how many votes are on Quil
In post 1308, sangres wrote:looks like maybe 3. I was concerned he put himself at L-1.
Sooooooooo you're voting quilford, but you don't have really any particularly strong convictions that he's scum. Why are you voting him then? And why are you not trying to figure out his alignment? You say you're waiting on his reads and reasons, but why are you content to sit on your laurels waiting for him to do something? Empire and I have been discussing his meta, talking about what we've found...what games we're reading to try to figure quilford out. YOU haven't engaged in any of that at all. Not one peep. You say that you've been trying to engage us, but you haven't. And here was a perfect opportunity to, that you didn't take.
So your turn. Do something. Show me you're actually trying to figure out the game because you don't get to sit up in your condescending chair and claim we should be doing more while ignoring every thing we have been doing, not doing a damn thing yourself, and sitting around and waiting.
And why did you care that he put himself at l-1? Like really you're voting him. If you really did care that he didn't get lynched unexpectedly, where's your unvote? Cuz this just looks like phone-it-in posting to look like your concerned about the game though not really actually trying to figure it out.
In post 1380, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Something that just occured to me while reading the latest Gold Saucer vs. sangres stuff: so we know that trees that get mislynched get to stick around forever basically unless they get doused/ignited (a process that takes at least two day phases to do)...my question is how do you guys expect this to inform the scum strategy in this game? I have some theories about it but I'd like to see what all of you think first.
As a hint for what I think: we might be approaching this game the wrong way.
In post 1306, sangres wrote:In post 1299, Gold Saucer wrote:If I had a clue, I would say so.
You're voting us. You're obviously either clueless or scum. You're waving bork's towniness around like it's a flag that obviates you doing enough to be readable on your own. And voting us while I've been every bit as obvtown this time. You've never taken a stand on that read, just cast doubt on me from the start.
I think you're town. But neither Nacho nor I have you in our tippy-top townreads and for me it's mostly your lack of engagement, along with a paranoia about bork that I think is likely baseless.
I know you're busy, but it's ridiculous what it's taken to get you to engage us.
In post 1365, sangres wrote:And honestly, I don't know whether that belief is because I haven't read the game closely enough or you guys have been slipping into the background a bit. Don't care. I don't have as good of a grasp as I should on your perception of the game state, and the way I'm going to do that is by prodding.
In post 1371, sangres wrote:In post 1291, Gold Saucer wrote:And hey I get regfan being somewhat paranoid, thigh he really shouldn't be, but he doesn't have experience with Bork so needing me to post to feel better about our slot makes sense. It shouldn't be coming from you, not in the way it has.
What do you mean, in the way it has?
In post 1385, Gold Saucer wrote:In post 1306, sangres wrote:In post 1299, Gold Saucer wrote:If I had a clue, I would say so.
You're voting us. You're obviously either clueless or scum. You're waving bork's towniness around like it's a flag that obviates you doing enough to be readable on your own. And voting us while I've been every bit as obvtown this time. You've never taken a stand on that read, just cast doubt on me from the start.
I think you're town. But neither Nacho nor I have you in our tippy-top townreads and for me it's mostly your lack of engagement, along with a paranoia about bork that I think is likely baseless.
I know you're busy, but it's ridiculous what it's taken to get you to engage us.
I would like you to substantiate this. When have I not been doing enough on my own? Since day start?
Mostly what I want you to substantiate is this "it's ridiculous what it's taken to get you to engage us." Because from where I'm sitting you haven't tried not once. I looked at your posts since day start, and you didn't address us at all. You didn't engage with Bork when he was here and posting, so how is it ridiculous because to me this looks like word vomit designed to brow beat me into a town read on you. You've been pulling the scum or dumb crap since day one and it's nothing more than you going oh watch out if you don't town read me I'm going to scum read you.
If you and Nacho spoke about the game and it surprised you to find that we weren't your top town read, how come there wasn't a peep from you guys until people started worrying about us? Because there's been absolutely no indication that you're worried about us until Nacho asked Bork what he's done that's so town. And hey, maybe you don't intend to mislynch us today because yeah that probably wouldn't be good play, but laying the groundwork for it? I can totally buy that.
And speaking of, we are not going to go through our iso and tell you why we're town and what we've done so town. I swear you guys are not reading our posts. I want to see you guys come to a read organically. Talk to us. Tell us what you have a problem with. Do your read thing because that's what will help me determine your alignment not threats of being scumread or nebulous insults about my cluelessness. In final fantasy x when Nati/I were paranoid of you, you expressed the concern that I was reading you incorrectly much more naturally, here it feels forced like you're going through the motions of it to get me to back off.
And also while we're at it, why are you just sitting around waiting for Nati to show up? You've played plenty of games with muffin, so why aren't you trying to read him either?
In post 1385, Gold Saucer wrote:In post 1306, sangres wrote:In post 1299, Gold Saucer wrote:If I had a clue, I would say so.
You're voting us. You're obviously either clueless or scum. You're waving bork's towniness around like it's a flag that obviates you doing enough to be readable on your own. And voting us while I've been every bit as obvtown this time. You've never taken a stand on that read, just cast doubt on me from the start.
I think you're town. But neither Nacho nor I have you in our tippy-top townreads and for me it's mostly your lack of engagement, along with a paranoia about bork that I think is likely baseless.
I know you're busy, but it's ridiculous what it's taken to get you to engage us.
I would like you to substantiate this. When have I not been doing enough on my own? Since day start?
Mostly what I want you to substantiate is this "it's ridiculous what it's taken to get you to engage us." Because from where I'm sitting you haven't tried not once. I looked at your posts since day start, and you didn't address us at all. You didn't engage with Bork when he was here and posting, so how is it ridiculous because to me this looks like word vomit designed to brow beat me into a town read on you. You've been pulling the scum or dumb crap since day one and it's nothing more than you going oh watch out if you don't town read me I'm going to scum read you.
If you and Nacho spoke about the game and it surprised you to find that we weren't your top town read, how come there wasn't a peep from you guys until people started worrying about us? Because there's been absolutely no indication that you're worried about us until Nacho asked Bork what he's done that's so town. And hey, maybe you don't intend to mislynch us today because yeah that probably wouldn't be good play, but laying the groundwork for it? I can totally buy that.
And speaking of, we are not going to go through our iso and tell you why we're town and what we've done so town. I swear you guys are not reading our posts. I want to see you guys come to a read organically. Talk to us. Tell us what you have a problem with. Do your read thing because that's what will help me determine your alignment not threats of being scumread or nebulous insults about my cluelessness. In final fantasy x when Nati/I were paranoid of you, you expressed the concern that I was reading you incorrectly much more naturally, here it feels forced like you're going through the motions of it to get me to back off.
And also while we're at it, why are you just sitting around waiting for Nati to show up? You've played plenty of games with muffin, so why aren't you trying to read him either?