"Maybe there’s a clue hidden in these ancient drawings. It looks like there’s lots of triangles hidden in this room..."
-Steven,Serious Steven
Deadline
"Maybe there’s a clue hidden in these ancient drawings. It looks like there’s lots of triangles hidden in this room..."
-Steven,Serious Steven
In post 389, NicCage wrote:I think Max, mastina, Sonic X, vezo and farside are all probably town.
In post 396, NicCage wrote:
As far as Ricastle goes, I'm not a fan. Going after beer is lame and easy, if he's town he'd be the number 1 thing scum would latch onto, and I thought his following push on Sonic X was really awful I have no idea why Ricastle voted for him and I can't imagine how there is some kind of PoE that could take place between Sonic and beer.
In post 410, Trench Warfare wrote:I actually townread the request. He is not specifically asking to be copped, triggering Godfather fears, but he wants any action. That suggests to me a deeper motivation that it would be anti town to comment on. If there's a role such as "fruit vendor" targeting Sonic might not be a bad idea. No skin off our back if I am wrong.
In post 478, Trench Warfare wrote:Vezok:Can you summarise Beer's opening in the PT? From what I currently gather, he claimed scum, then said he meant town, then said he was trolling, then overcompensated to try to make you believe the whole thing was a troll.
In post 505, Fro99er wrote:Yeah, skybird simply asks beer how beer scumhunts. This is the exchange
In post 497, Skybird wrote:In post 459, Beer wrote:In post 457, Skybird wrote:Beer, how would you describe your scum hunting style then? If you think looking at town or scum motivation is silly, what do you look for in determining who is town and who is scum?
No, I think suggestingeverythingmust have townorscum motivation is silly.
OK, I see. Thanks.
Skybird just leaves it. Was skybird really interested in how beer scumhunts? If so, why not follow up on getting beer to answer that question? Or was skybird just asking it to ask it, and not actually care what the answer to the scumhunting part was?
In post 528, Metal Sonic wrote:
Just because something isn't useful for you, doesn't mean that it's useless for me. I'm clarifying a claim that contradicts what was publicly mentioned in the rules about neighborhood mechanics, so fucking pardon me if I was confused and wanted to understand what was going on. Also, what's obvious to you isn't necessarily obvious to everybody else, so go fuck yourself. Especially when you think you're going to lecture me about "helpful", fucking lol..
In post 544, farside22 wrote:In post 135, Fluminator wrote:My role is pretty cool.
I have less cell service than I though so I doubt I'll be able to post much for the first week. I'll do my best.
Hi. I'm going to give an excuse to be a lurksack in my first post. Please don't notice.
In post 801, Trench Warfare wrote:
In post 505, Fro99er wrote:Yeah, skybird simply asks beer how beer scumhunts. This is the exchange
In post 497, Skybird wrote:In post 459, Beer wrote:In post 457, Skybird wrote:Beer, how would you describe your scum hunting style then? If you think looking at town or scum motivation is silly, what do you look for in determining who is town and who is scum?
No, I think suggestingeverythingmust have townorscum motivation is silly.
OK, I see. Thanks.
Skybird just leaves it. Was skybird really interested in how beer scumhunts? If so, why not follow up on getting beer to answer that question? Or was skybird just asking it to ask it, and not actually care what the answer to the scumhunting part was?
I don't see any follow-up question to this that's particularly relevant. Did you?
In post 797, Bins wrote:In post 796, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Bins bare-bones response to my question aside (they voted Cage after Cage got a vote.. come on, why is Cage even in this list?), I appreciate grapes trying to get some focus in here.
Bins, do you have anything else to say about NicCage besides that? That vote just screams 'I'm looking for a reason to vote'.
Actually, no.
Bare votes make people squirm more.
See? You're doing it.
In post 807, MaxwellPuckett wrote:A single vote isn't going to make anybody squirm right now, it's too late in the day. That's why I unvoted you, it was brought up that only multiple votes on someone are going to get us anywhere.
And, uh.. my vote wasn't bare. Did you read the post it came from?
In post 797, Bins wrote:In post 796, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Bins bare-bones response to my question aside (they voted Cage after Cage got a vote.. come on, why is Cage even in this list?), I appreciate grapes trying to get some focus in here.
Bins, do you have anything else to say about NicCage besides that? That vote just screams 'I'm looking for a reason to vote'.
Actually, no.
Bare votes make people squirm more.
See? You're doing it.
In post 812, farside22 wrote:My ability so far is confirmed.
Does that make me town or scum in your view rational?
In post 813, farside22 wrote:@rational:
Vezo confirmed his ability, mastin confirmed her lack of vote.
What does that tell you about their alignment and why?
In post 815, Fluminator wrote:Bugger off Reasonable. I'm not lying about my real life so I could lurk. Is that really honestly what you thought I was doing?
In post 817, Drixx wrote:EbWoP: #168 is the post that Flum appears to be pretending to be offended by, not the #160 I mistakenly put in in the prior post.
Love, still,
Drixx
In post 820, Fluminator wrote:My main thought right now though is I can understand why there's a wagon on you right now.