In post 97, Kaboose wrote:No I meant you would look more town as a scum person doing it earlier like you "tried" I still think you're making a big deal about "hammering" when you put them on L-1..
In post 98, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 95, Kop wrote:In post 92, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 90, Kop wrote:In post 86, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 85, Kaboose wrote:So I'm scum because I think you and game are partners, and because scum can't bus?
Yes for first part, no for second. Why would scum hammer a partner this early?
There is not a time limit for scum to hammer a partner. I have seen a few games where someone has bussed his own partner, and he gets town credit from the off, and pretty much go the whole game without suspicion simply because of that 'phrase'. It gets thrown around much, especially if the partner being hammered only has a week scum PR where it's deemed worth throwing away.
Why would that be done in this game?
It can be done in any game, if there is a team of 2, in aid to distance from your buddy that is on the chopping board. You aren't going to sit and watch your buddy go down and defend him because when he is lynched later, and flips scum, they'll look at you defending him from being lynched before.
You bus in aid to distance so nobody looks at you in the same light if your defending him.
That seems suboptimal.
In post 99, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 96, Kop wrote:In post 93, GrayFoxxxx wrote:It's not like gameplay is an auto lynch I don't see why I would do that as scum
He was practically almost at L-1 at one point.
Do you think anyone else was going to hammer him? I dont. So the strategy of bussing seems pointless. Kaboose's reasoning is way off.
In post 103, GrayFoxxxx wrote:@ Kop
If I was on a scum team, and I was at L-1 and my partner wanted to hammer me, I would think he was dumb. There is no GOOD reason to do it. It's not worth the risk.
In post 100, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Also you are avoiding my original question. What reason do you have to lynch me and gameplay? Please try to be a little less hypothetical.
In post 102, Kop wrote:
No, at the end of the day, the question is not the hammering part, it's the stopping of a role claim, to prevent lies possibly being seen through.
In post 106, Wisdom wrote:I don't think Gray and game are partners, this discussion is silly
In post 107, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 102, Kop wrote:
No, at the end of the day, the question is not the hammering part, it's the stopping of a role claim, to prevent lies possibly being seen through.
Can you elaborate on this? I want to understand what you mean before I reply. Stopping of a role claim? And lies from who?
Does that apply to this situation?
In post 50, Kaboose wrote:But you're his partner I think. Especially with that soft defence you just gave him.
In post 110, Wisdom wrote:Because you look like scum.
You are focusing on someone partnering you with someone else when it's pointless.
In post 112, Kop wrote:At most people only claim when at L-1, to which was going to happen here, there is a distinct possibility that you jumped off to prevent a claim, to which could have been a possibility we could have seen through this lie, later on in the game when things don't add up.
It could relate to this situation, but not 100%.
In post 115, Wisdom wrote:You are scumreading someone just because he is calling you scum with someone else.
In post 118, Wisdom wrote:Bad logic doesn't equal scum in any way.
In post 118, Wisdom wrote:Bad logic doesn't equal scum in any way.
In post 120, Wisdom wrote:Uh, no. Town follow bad logic all the time.
In post 122, Wisdom wrote:It's not a town tell. Ugh, this is tiring. Can you play some games and get some experience before you start talking in absolutes?