In post 3092, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Anyone care to align with me tonight? Or talk? I want someone to chat with, I'm quickly learning that I make better decisions when it isn't just my own mind.
^Like, I'd avoid allying with him like the plague considering this.
In post 2882, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Titus, why are you so ready to vote mastin? We've yet to hear an explanation. But if that explanation involves any kind of admittance that she wasn't being truthful, that's my vote. But I don't think that's gonna happen. It just seems way too unlikely to me.
This is trying for both sides: leaving open the option of hopping onto my wagon should the opportunity arise, yet also trying for the towncred of white knighting me. (Which continues after I post, when I very much did not need the help.)
PEDITx2: If you want a Fro99er lynch, tell us why, because I know there's material for it since there's been Fro99er wagons all game. Just don't make that material unproven assumptions that you're for some reason really sure about
In spite of Maxwell's insistence, this is very bad no matter how you look at it. He's acknowledging that there's been a shitload of reasons why Fro99er's been suspected, yet is boiling it down to that one.
In post 2832, MaxwellPuckett wrote:We know fusions are separate from alliances. I know that, too. But why does that make you assume that every gem has both an alliance ability and a fusion ability? Those two lines of thinking don't follow, you've just based that on the fact that Sapphire had two separate abilities for fusions and alliances. There are ten gem characters that could possibly be in this setup. We've seen one.
This is further Fro99er defense, too.
The bad Replace-in vote when I was trying to get support on Frogger.
You might think, "But how does that matter?" Well,
The town action when realizing the wagon they're on is larger than they thought/would prefer
is to unvote
.
In post 2486, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I don't think survivalism is a town trait, but town can be survivalists just the same. The fact that going after the other wagon is what they both decided to do is what I noticed. Instead of Frogger, sonic, or NicCage, they each jumped on each other, which makes me unsure about both being scum.
Then there's this. This was another red flag that should have told him to stay away from the Replace-in wagon, yet he joined it anyway.
In post 2450, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Mastin's mod argument against Fro99er isn't that great. The only part of their argument that really holds water is the ascetic claim thing.
Defending Frogger...
In post 2365, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I guess I've been using a different definition of lynchbait. I was using it as 'a player who is incredibly easy to lynch, for one reason or another'. I was saying that fuzzy's play has been better today, so he's less likely to be lynched than he was D1.
So no, I don't want anyone to compromise on fuzzy, quite the opposite.
...And fuzzy, too.
In post 2359, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Constantine, NicCage, Sonic X, Fro99er, Replace In, and Fuzzy. Those are all the 'wagons' we have right now. Can everyone give their opinions on these 6?
Replace In and Constantine are great lynches for today. I wouldn't fight a Sonic X lynch, and honestly I just.. don't really care about NicCage? Everything about them is lukewarm, from their own opinions to the cases against them. Honestly when I think about NiCage I just think of the movie Con Air, and not of their play. NicCage, vote somebody, maybe?
Fuzzy and Fro99er are town.
Back here, look at how he gives details on each of the wagons...except Frogger and Fuzzy, which are just generically called town.
In post 2273, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I'm also totally behind a Replace In lynch. If that one ends up having more traction that Constantine, I'll move.
Back here, Maxwell was basically willing to lynch both Constantine AND Replace-in.
In post 2256, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Fuzzy, what do you think about everyone's accusations/complaints against you, saying that you're just looking at the surface of events as they happen, and not thinking too deeply about, well, anything. Does it make you want to change your play? Are you alright with how you've been playing? I mean, you've already said a lynch against you was justified.
This reads very heavily as coaching a scumbuddy.
In post 2185, MaxwellPuckett wrote:To add, Replace In had really done nothing to make me reconsider, until they said their Lion claim cleared Fro99er. This seems kind of a ridiculous strategy as scum trying to clear scum, that falls apart as soon as one of them is lynched, so I really doubt they're both scum. Replace In is higher on the lynch-branch than Fro99er, anyways, whose play has picked up since leaving the hydra. Meanwhile, Replace In's has kind of stagnated.
This should have told him Replace-in was town, too. (In fact, I pointed this out in-thread and was promptly ignored.)
In fact, if you go through Maxwell's iso...a lot of his reads are sheepish. NicCage as nullscum, mirroring farside. Sonic as a not-so-great read when being pressured by others. Constantine as a scumread when there was a wagon there.
In post 796, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I think everyone should look at Bins again, but if that isn't going anywhere than Ra9in9 Bull/radmann/Reasonably Rational is a better lynchpool for me. Farside is saying that fuzzy's meta says scum, but I dislike voting on meta alone, especially from word of mouth. I think fuzzy is earnest town.
Then there's this, where Maxwell directs attention everywhere except where it needs to go. Read the full post and the excerpts for the players it's on. It's basically pushing attention everywhere except for Raging Bull and fuzzy.
And so on and so forth.
