In post 769, Dwlee99 wrote:Quil, there's more than one scum. Not to mention I don't even consider that an answer because I disagree with your read on LLD.
In post 770, popsofctown wrote:Nah, I'm not entirely sure it was the word I was searching for.
In post 776, Quilford wrote:In post 770, popsofctown wrote:Nah, I'm not entirely sure it was the word I was searching for.
Can you sum up the ideas behind what you're getting at with the word 'cadence' then? You don't have to encapsulate it all in a word.
In post 571, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Quilford is probably still town, despite the fact his IQ just took a nose dive after this post. See? Bad action, decently town intent behind it.
In post 782, Shinobi wrote:I literally don't understand a single bit of this Quilford wagon and it reeks of awfulness.
In post 780, popsofctown wrote:LLD is making me hungry enough to go get food
I will speak curses of her if I gain weight.
In post 783, Quilford wrote:In post 571, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Quilford is probably still town, despite the fact his IQ just took a nose dive after this post. See? Bad action, decently town intent behind it.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don't know what you're expecting.
In post 787, Quilford wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I like that you quoted a post 200 posts ago and expect my reads to be static. I'm very comfortable and confident in my vote.
Ah, but will you sacrifice yourself if I flip town LLD? (:
In post 790, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 787, Quilford wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I like that you quoted a post 200 posts ago and expect my reads to be static. I'm very comfortable and confident in my vote.
Ah, but will you sacrifice yourself if I flip town LLD? (:
You're not flippin' town, scumfuck~.
Look at this cheeky scumfuck, lol.
In post 785, chamber wrote:In post 782, Shinobi wrote:I literally don't understand a single bit of this Quilford wagon and it reeks of awfulness.
I think quilford in a vacuum would be a solid vote here. But Pops exists. Pops is also on his wagon for something that sounds nothing like what I'd use the word cadence for.
In post 794, Dwlee99 wrote:Chamber, I feel more likely to hit scum on Quil. Just his posts. They are so logically incorrect almost. It feels like common knowledge that intent is a big thing to find someone's alignment. But now apparently it's reads.
Dwlee99 wrote:Varsoon and Xtox, Quil. I think you and Varsoon being scum buddies is super obvious.
Chamber, I feel more likely to hit scum on Quil. Just his posts. They are so logically incorrect almost. It feels like common knowledge that intent is a big thing to find someone's alignment. But now apparently it's reads.
In post 663, Dwlee99 wrote:Seriously though, Quil. Your reasoning makes perfect sense. But I just don't agree with the conclusions.
In post 670, Dwlee99 wrote:Quil, you need to stop being right.
In post 794, Dwlee99 wrote:Chamber, I feel more likely to hit scum on Quil. Just his posts.They are so logically incorrect almost.It feels like common knowledge that intent is a big thing to find someone's alignment. But now apparently it's reads.
In post 792, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 785, chamber wrote:In post 782, Shinobi wrote:I literally don't understand a single bit of this Quilford wagon and it reeks of awfulness.
I think quilford in a vacuum would be a solid vote here. But Pops exists. Pops is also on his wagon for something that sounds nothing like what I'd use the word cadence for.
Give me a quick rundown on Pops?
I mean, beyond the one post you quoted.
In post 771, chamber wrote:Anyway, all of this is a big distraction. Pops is scum. I don't know how he got you all to unlynch him with one quote on UT.
