In post 1071, Titus wrote:@Performer, why would you raise the spectre of Constantine?
Constantine is one of the worst FM players that I've seen. He gives up...zak 's demeanor toward this game is like his - he doesn't care
In post 1074, talah wrote: In post 982, Performer wrote:
793 -
Aside from genuine, what do you think of Luna's play and why has that read changed back (to the point where you're FOS'ing her now)?
I already said this in
785 . According to her, she believes I’m continuing to evade answering her but I answered her already, yet she continues to keep her vote on me. Luna shed some light on what I'm not answering for you
Can you please explain how what you just said and what in Post 785 explains "Aside from Genuine, what do you think of Luna's play?"
You have also shown no evolution of reads which was what I was after - a thought process.
In post 982, Performer wrote:Why is Banana a townread of yours?
Again, I stated in
785 , scum wants to push through mislynch, but town wants to look at motives between players.
This is what you said about Banana in 785:
In post 785, Performer wrote:677 and
678 point to Ban and IaI being town as scum would rather rush us to mislynch someone than calmly look at the motives between everyone
That's funny. I don't recall any calmess at all in Banana up to that point, and a few questions in realtime to IaI caused him to tilt.
Do you think Calmness is a towntell? What's the difference between calmness and lurking, then?
How is each looking at motives?
Look just sentences in response to each question would be fine. "I already answered it" would not, because both times you've said you've answered the question you've avoided answering what I asked and just answered what you wanted to while not explaining why the answer to the question I wanted was best answered by avoiding answering what I asked.
That's a mouthful.
Also why are you voting Zakk?
My read on FA changed from null to scum because he read Titus and Vee as his scumreads
My read on Ban changed from scum to null
Someone desperately pushing through a mislynch is scum who's impatient for a mislynch (not calmly looking through things...scum don't say things like "this wagon is a mislynch)
Lurking is someone who's inactive, doesn't post much
-----
According to Luna before her recent clarification , she believed I’m continuing to evade answering her but I thought I answered her already.
-She continued to keep her vote on me
-I thought I answered her already
-She told me I didn't and clarified
-I said ok, it was a misunderstanding, I didn't mean to not answer her
-So I'm leaning back to town on her because of her play
-----
I'm ok with zak being lynched, in
982
His posts don't convey that he cares...and
zak put a naked vote on Aj
Aj voted Titus later
after 3 dozen pages, zak voted Titus after Aj did
zak mentioned 2 mafia factions, which is completely ludicrous given we don't have enough players...I don't believe that's under Normal guidelines either...sounded like his reason to stir chaos
933 – further points to my suspicion of zak. Ninjas his way in with a vote and that’s it. Funny that Aj calls Titus’s and my posts garbage yet doesn’t pick at zak’s random vote. Interesting that zak skipped over replying to my 578 about him keeping his vote on Aj for the longest time. He then adds his vote on Titus, after Aj's vote on Titus.... parked his vote on Aj for the longest time and after 3 dozen pages, votes Titus. Zak’s interaction with Luna & Ved on p38 further keeps me suspicious of him…and
973 ? Never seen or heard of more than 1 mafia faction in a 14-player game
