Why only if I die.
If i am dead you can take my assertions (about math and what is for instance fundamental) as being based on actual experience and background knowledge.
I in my expert opinion am qualified to say what is
fundamental
.
Whats wrong with DGBs scum puter that is IMO a bit alignment indicative about DGB.
DGB did the scum putering wrong. (did not use own algorithm) (this bit alone is not all that alignment indicative... BTW)
The difference was important. One of the steps is to compute how many scum you expect in the unflipped players.
Its kind of
fundamental
to the concept of the scum puter to do that. DGB didnt.
DGB says DGB was feeling lazy or words to that effect and cut corners, Ok. so yeah kinda.
BUT
When i initially asked DGB about, about counting a wagon that already had one flipped scum on it and expecting another.
Which is an obvious ooops I fucked up kind of error. DGB instead claimed that "no wagons are expected to have a bit more than average amount of scum."
That is a flat out made up answer. (it is incongruous with the documented algorithm on the wiki) << this bit is the problem.
other larger wagons in her analysis could be expected to perhaps have 2 scum, but she counted them as if they were one.
and then one wagon expected to have none so people on that wagon SHOULD get town points not scum ones.. were given scum points.
I am fairly sure DGB did not do that analysis to work out who would be scum, but knew what the answer was before they started.
(or at worst wet finger guessed it by visual inspection.)
Again, hey i can in fact visually inspect the wagon and tell you what i reckon is likely. Sakua votes a lot, the scum puter will scum read her no matter the alignment.
but
the bit i just cant really put in town DGB, is
When i initially asked DGB about, about counting a wagon that already had one flipped scum on it and expecting another.
Which is an obvious ooops I fucked up kind of error. DGB instead claimed that "no wagons are expected to have a bit more than average amount of scum."
That is a flat out made up answer.
In post 3442, DrippingGoofball wrote: In post 3440, AxleGreaser wrote:Surely according to your assumptions once you find enough scum on a wagon then any unflipped people look townier not scummier.
There tends to be more scum on wagons than expected by chance.
This in now way deals with the problem of failing to subtract the number of flipped scum from the expected number left on the wagon.
Fudging it and using larger wagons with an expectaion >1 as if they are all 1 is meh. Including the one that is now expected to have zero scum is double meh.
How strong is that?
Not all that strong, I like my frogger points that many people reject more. BUT it is clean read on new slot, and i know its not from being tunneled. That one is pretty much straight out of the numerical rational side of my brain.
Whats the town explanation. DGb always knew the computaion ass wrong but thought I didnt actually know what I was talking about so they just blew me off.
My advice. betting axle doesnt know stuff is dumb.