In post 629, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: In post 571, Garmr wrote:I like how lala doesn't even dispute my points against her and instead try to discredit me by using other things not related. She doesn't even bother.
Garmr, can you just talk about why you think Lalendra is scum?
Yep for sure
first off lalendra is a newer player and she's pretty horrible as scum because she is obvious just like she is in this game. she has completed 5 games game with 1 flacked so six games in total out of those games she has been scum once and lynched straight away day 1 and the flacked game was scum as well but one post doesn't count anyway.
Day 1
First off there's my day 1 case
In post 217, Lalendra wrote:There's a difference between not scum hunting, and just not posting walls and pointless read-lists. If you have questions I'll answer them, but I typically wait until I feel like I have a solid case on someone before I say something, rather than making lists of leans and nulls.
She said this early on to dodge a question and she would present a case when she feels like it that's ok if she actually does present a case but look at this vote.
In post 259, Lalendra wrote:
Garmr – “Honestly” was interesting, but I don’t think it was as much of a scumtell as everyone seemed to think it was.
96 also feels to me like he is being overly-defensive town, I really don’t think that it is a scummy post. But then along comes
171. What is the purpose of this post? Why say you’re a power role if you’re not willing to say what? Why claim when no one asked you to? Why so cryptic? And then you just give up on the game. Anti-town at best. Don’t play if you’re just going to totally screw your team by playing poorly and then giving up. I dislike PL but this is the wagon that I am most inclined to pursue at this point, because as Hieirama pointed out, being blatantly anti-town is almost as bad as being scum.
VOTE: Garmr
.
This her voting me latter over 200 posts and she doesn't have one scum read and she's trying to push a policy lynch. It obvious she wanted me a power role dead instead of trying to find scum. It was also obvious at that point of the game that I was back in the game and trying my best and it was obvious that she said she was intrested to see how i would respond when I come back
In post 276, Lalendra wrote:
In post 269, Garmr wrote:
This here is a extremely poor reason to vote me and a total misrep. It's pretty obvious I was going for a gambit with out saying my power role to get scum to shoot me also I never gave up on the game I just needed a little break to clear my head about things and read other peoples reactions. The way your potraying me here seems like a scummy excuse to vote someone and say they are town at the same time. Then you try and play it off as a policy lynch which you even said yourself you don't like doing.
Sorry for misunderstanding, not sure why I thought you gave up, OH RIGHT BECAUSE YOU LITERALLY SAID YOU WERE GIVING UP THAT'S WHY.
Anyway, since Garmr no longer seems like he's just going to mail it in the rest of the game,
UNVOTE: Garmr I guess.
In post 209, Lalendra wrote:Really not a fan of the claim or the weird emotional outburst so early in the game. It's not that intense yet. I will wait and see what happens after his two-day hiatus though before I decide.
This proves she is a liar as she knew that I was having my break to get back in the game and when she votes me I am already showing effort to get back in. So her vote for me being anti town is out of place and scummy as fuck and she's already trying to back up.
In post 215, Lalendra wrote:Most of myko's posts have been crap. I'm not into posting fluff. When I have something to say, I'll say it. Yeah there's 9 pages, but most of it is garbage, and we still have plenty of time left in this day phase, so I'm waiting for more developments.
Only after been hounded does she start to give reads day 1 but then look at her dier fire scum read.
In post 377, Lalendra wrote:In post 353, Dierfire wrote:
The second sentence wasn't a joke--that part is true! Your vote typically doesn't stick, though.
Oh my god, this exchange bothers me something fierce. This isn't just pressuring anymore.
VOTE: Dierfire
This after 376 post is her first vote on someone for being scum and it's for this no reasoning at fucking all.
This is the major post through the big killer no one has pointed out
In post 415, Lalendra wrote:Keeping up with the game, not opposed to the pistachi0 lynch but I don't want to vote until we have an official VC. I think BBT's point is legit,
we won't learn much more going in circles like this,
and the Dier wagon isn't going anywhere.
p-edit: That's actually not a bad point, Haschel. The target won't react properly if they know it's just a pressure vote. But don't you think that if they are close enough to being lynched, it gives the same effect as if it was a real wagon forming? Aren't they under some pressure knowing that their reactions to the votes being cast on them are going to determine whether they turn into real votes or not?
She didn't care if the day fucking ended as she said herself we were just going around in circles thus showing some understanding that there really wasn't much that would of been gained.
day 2
In post 480, Lalendra wrote:
Read my ISO, I think I've been pretty clear about my cases for both of them.
In her Iso she said nothing about me being scum she only made a case about me being anti town. Also she has no reasoning as to why dierfire is scum no reasoning HER TWO FUCKING TOP READS AND SHE HAS NO REASONING ON EITHER.
In post 498, Lalendra wrote:I am not at all liking the exchange between melter and garmr. Melter is making valid points, Garmr is making almost unintelligible responses that mostly consist of "NOPE YOUR WroNG LOL". I don't really feel as though melter is misrepresenting what went on with garmr d1, and his responses to melter's points have caused him to officially surpass dier as my top scum read atm. While I didn't have a problem with people voting pistachio per se, I didn't like the quick hammer; yes, there were other people who had declared ITH, which is precisely why you DON'T then hammer the person without saying anything. It was pretty clear that there was a reason that they were waiting to hammer him.
VOTE: garmr
Now when she votes me me she doesn't say which point in meltas post are valid and why they are again no reasoning she then misreps my entire post and tries to make me look I'm not given proper answers to melter That is scummy as shit. Goes on to explain she didn't like the quick hammer but remeber she previously said the day was going around in circles she's contradicting herself as I don't believe town would have such a big 180 if they thought they were going round in circles all the time. One of those points was me accusing myko of reaching was scummy which she did as well (also another copied reasoning from the rvs) the irony.
So what have we learned
not once has lalendra provided one reason to scum read any of her scum reads this whole game unless it's copied from someone else
