In post 593, Garmr wrote:@meanmelter ever heard of a compromise lynch welp yeah that's why I lynched pist and her lynch would of happened anyway.
Where the hell was the argument or dispute? You voted for him because you wanted the day to end. Which doesn't give me any reason to see your vote as townie.
In post 594, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 592, Meanmelter wrote:XXXI just personally have not seen too much convincing evidence against my hypothesis. But there isn't much for it either.It is mostly their D1 aggression towards each other and this post does not sit with me too well ->
In my original post I was thinking he was merely reaction fishing but he has yet to ever really comeback on it. And that's just the one thing giving me a feeling for the idea. Again, not very convincing.
@Keyser Söze: How would you feel if D1 Myko tunneled Garmr? Or perhaps, if Myko started tunneling Garmr D2? Would either change your stance on your opinion on the scum-team hypothesis?
I'm unsure of your question - mykonianhasbeen tunneling Gamr since D1 (or you may have misunderstood what I said?).
I think we just have a slightly different definition on tunneling. Mykonian has been commenting on a lot of other peoples arguments and actions. He HAS focused on Garmr for being his number one lynch, though I don't think that makes it tunneling. Maybe I am wrong and he is tunneling him. :v
In post 595, Garmr wrote:
Seriously through I ask people to look up my scum meta and bring what they think of it here and no one has done that which makes me think the people who have done that don't want to admit they are wrong.
I do NOT have the time in my life to look at your 60+ games and look at how you played as a scummy/town/PR player. Especially when you can just play differently every game anyway. This is such a weak excuse. I guess you tried, though.
In post 596, Keyser Söze wrote:Haschel Cedricson and Lalendra have been quiet
They've ALWAYS been quiet.
In post 608, Hieirama wrote:
Meanmelter wrote:In post 520, Hieirama wrote:@Herrcombs @meanmelter
In post 491, Meanmelter wrote:
@HieiramaYou said you agreed with Garmr's last paragraph in his post. Can you explain to me, in your words, where you found me to be misrepresenting him and where I was making it seem like a "giant fucking long time?"
I agreed with the fact that you failed to address his break and how he came back.
I didn't get the "giant fucking long time" part, but I feel as if the " nothing productive " is an understatement,((understatement, misrep sort of go along))
What is there to address about his break? He said he had zero motivation and that he might feel more motivated after two day break. He came back, gave a few reads and quick hammered Pistachi0n.
Perhaps you would like to inform me of what productive thing he did do?
You think the hardclaim was a scum thing, right? A counterargument would be that he ragequitted as Town and took a break, and he did come back better((at least imo he did)).
Sure.
242, Came back from break and gave Town reads.
269 and 270 scum reads.
And with that they continue to argue with people, mainly their scum reads. Arguing can be productive if done right, it can produce reads and opinions and all that good stuff.
He ragequit day one, from like 3 votes, and he's a townie...?
In post 626, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Just gonna leave this wagon for people to look at.
Really look at it.
Look at the people on it.
Scummy wagon, right? I know I wouldn't want to be a part of that. The only person on that wagon who I would confidently call town is Dwlee. Lalendra's and Mean's votes are pretty bad and I'm really not liking Myko's tunnel.
I'm also kind of surprised Myko wasn't first on the wagon...
Wow, we're voting for the
We've all made decent cases against him and if you want to just throw it out the window that's fine by me. You can just go right ahead and just replace out.