In post 673, Lying Cat wrote:I'm splitting this into two posts, because there's really two different concerns here. First your initial behavior and defense thereof. But you weren't putting pressure on Ved at that point. The wagon had already derailed, and you hadn't mentioned him in pages. On the other hand, you were pushing hard at both ETL and farside, but voting neither of them. I'll admit that getting a wagon on ETL would have been difficult, but there was more than enough tacit support for a farside wagon at the time. Your actions support a farside scumread over a Vedith one, but your vote doesn't.
So we agree ETL would be a hard wagon.
You point out a Farside lynch option - I counter with "Farside is lurking out, so pressure wagon on the slot is kinda pointless"
You also, otherwise, at best are complaining that I'm scumhunting multiple people at once and acting like it's an issue for some reason.
In post 673, Lying Cat wrote:For reference, what is your thought process on why someone posting elsewhere but not here makes them scum?
It's conscious avoidance of thread.
The only reason to do that is because you don't care about scumhunting in this game or are trying to lay low - both are worthy of lynching.
In post 673, Lying Cat wrote:Also, are you admitting to overstating your read on Vedith and were voting for pressure? Or at least to misrepresenting your reads?
I am not admitting to anything - I am pointing out how badly you misunderstand how I play when pressing this rather odd meta based case. Are you claiming that I *don't* do the thing I said I do in other games?
