While I had scumreads on Ether and SilverWolf and I thought the way they talked to each other looked pre-planned, I exaggerated the strength of my reads to force people to take positions. This game needed someone to push a strong case for it to come to life. So far, the players were just mulling about doing nothing.
Ether's reaction looked town. She enquired about my thoughts further and tried to read me. SilverWolf's looked like caught mafia. She started off by saying that it is reasonable for me to scumread her and then followed up with a weak return vote on me.
UNVOTE: Ether
VOTE: SilverWolf
Sakura Hana looked town as well although I don't understand why she's reading me through the lens of a newbie when I clearly stated I've played a lot of mafia on other forums. I read GM as slightly scummy for not reacting to the meat of my cases and choosing only to argue a peripheral line about my RQS, nor taking a stance on me despite me making a lot of waves. Lordj's vote on Ether right after I voted without acknowledging my case also looks slightly scummy.
In post 182, SilverWolf wrote:So what do you hope to learn from these RQS questions and how do they move the game forward and what do they tell you about anyone's alignment?
In post 207, Sakura Hana wrote:What do you expect to gain from your RQS questions, specially when the game had already moved away from RVS? <- Question to Ocean.
I don't learn anything just from the responses but they give me a baseline through which I can interpret future actions. If someone that prefers playing town are dragging their feet and being minimally active (like SilverWolf), there's a good chance they are mafia.
In post 183, SilverWolf wrote:Considering I voted for GM and was questioning her on her tone and different playstyle from the IC game I remembered with her, I would not call that maneuvering without attacking her.
By "maneuvering" I mean that you are trying to work yourself into a certain position without actually developing a read. You tell GoodMorning that she is playing more pro-town than a past game where she was a town IC to stroke her ego. Then you say that it bothers you because it is different but also say that you like her activity and enthusiam. That looks like mafia trying to position themselves into going either way depending on her response. If she attacks you, you can come back to the "GoodMorning is different therefore mafia" theme and if she buddies you like she did, you can back off. But ultimately you did nothing with your read on GoodMorning. Your play there has been a lot of positioning and no scumhunting.
In post 183, SilverWolf wrote:I backed off because I remembered that comment that was made in the large normal I was in and Ether's comments helped me remember that. I realized lordj's comment could of come from town so I unvoted.
If you thought Lordj's comment could come from town, why would you say it could never come from town? That looks like you are hastily covering up a slip rather than an honest mistake.
In post 183, SilverWolf wrote:I will admit I'm having trouble getting into the game and I'm not sure what my problem is, as I usually don't have this issue and I'm not sure if I'm experiencing apathy or what. If you want to call that scummy, I wouldn't blame you. I'll have to see what I can do to fix this as I was looking forward to this game so meh................don't know.
Note the contradiction between you saying you're not going to "blame me" and proceeding to scumread me anyways in your later post. Here you think it is understandable to scumread you but later you vote me mostly for scumreading you - it has to be that because you said my points on Ether had merit.
In post 184, goodmorning wrote:It looks like Ether is directing SilverWolf away from bad pushes.
Why wouldn't they just do that in their Mafia thread? And why the associatives before flips?
I thought the mafia were only allowed to talk during the night but I looked at the first post again and it seems you are right. I retract that aspect of my suspicion.
In post 188, lordj210 wrote:i think with someone at l-1,l-2 they will feel extremely pressured and would act alot different trying to save themselves then they normally would.
When someone is feeling pressured, they may do more alignment-revealing things than they normally would. Why do you disagree?
In post 188, lordj210 wrote:after rereading and looking more or less just at lohas posts i feel like the case on her is basically jsut off previous off site mafia games that they may or may not have played together cant really say its a good case so im going to
VOTE: ether because i feel she is just wanting to lynch someone anyone, stated the case on Loha it stuck with a couple of players if it didnt stick she woulda jsut made a case up on someone else
I made a case against Ether and voted her. Why didn't you say anything about it or whether or not you agreed with it. I'd expect town to mention something either agreeing with me because I posted a case on your suspect or saying Ether was mafia but not for the reasons I stated. Your vote fit in with you being mafia and voting a burgeoning wagon on Ether without acknowledging how the wagon formed.
In post 189, Ether wrote:I can elaborate on why I think coolkyledude's town if it's important and other people are bothered by this. But I kind of want him to post more instead of answering.
Yeah, do this. Now that he replaced out, you are not really throwing away a chance to develop your read further by revealing what you know.
In post 189, Ether wrote:Those three blatantly
perceive
themselves as newbies, and it shows. (Well, maybe lordj doesn't. But I do.) LoHa described himself as a veteran and his second post was dripping with mafia jargon. So yes, I'm holding him to a higher standard than those three. (He's also not actually admitting that he doesn't have reads, unlike Mandarin and lordj; he's just failing to have them, beyond sorta-kinda OMGUSing me and occasionally bringing up Sakura's vote from Page 1.) It's hard for me to believe that you don't see a difference. <snip> What do you think of him on his own merits?
LoHa doesn't strike me as any more experienced than any of the other non-SE players. The types of arguments he used like asking Sakura if she wanted to be sheeped, and telling you that you are misrepresenting him is fairly typical of players with not a lot of experience. I don't have an alignment read on him. I assumed he was town when I was reading you as mafia but I'm not sure at this point.
In post 189, Ether wrote:A lot of your accusations toward me are for attacking LoHa for things while ignoring or townreading other newbies for similar things. So why me/SilverWolf? If I were scum with another SE, why would I be bothering with this supposed double standard?
If you and SilverWolf were both mafia, you can't lynch just based on your two votes. You need some newbies on your side. It looked to me at that point like you were selectively scumreading some people and not others so you can buddy who you want and push who you want rather than question everything equally and take an unbiased approach.
I agree but why? I want to hear your reasoning.
Just finished page 8. Skimmed page 9 and I'll analyze it in a bit.