In post 899, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:No paranoia whatsoever on both games and i haven't rolled scum against Nacho since either of those.
Addenum: we were both town on both of those last games
~Sakura
In post 899, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:No paranoia whatsoever on both games and i haven't rolled scum against Nacho since either of those.
In post 883, Davsto wrote:In post 769, Nachomamma8 wrote:It'll likely take me a couple of days to properly catch up; want to try to catchup in a more pro town way than my usual "read nothing, start doing things later".
Just decided to look at Nacho's ISO and ahahahahaha
In post 884, Wingback wrote:Regardless, I'm not going to restrict my lynch choices to just the three you have listed. If you want to truly collaborate on your reads, you'll respond to my questions and flesh them out. I like your entrance and I liked your depth of posting but I'm not the kind of player who's going to let someone else arbitrarily choose three people and lynch only out of those three. If you want my support, flesh out all of your reads
In post 887, Thor665 wrote:Ank was town - so...that is assuredly something he does at least do a fair amount as town. So...Ockham.
In post 892, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:Here he's also using the fact that i've snowed him to show paranoia on my slot, when in recent games he's never had paranoia on my slot when he's town (Point: I haven't rolled scum against nacho in a while, so if he had this sort of paranoia, he would have shown it in games where we were both town like Saki or corpse party, heck he didnt even try to read wisdom and tried to read ME on corpse party where I hydra'd with Wisdom).
In post 747, Vedith wrote:Why is 308 a good post?
In post 747, Vedith wrote:Can you go into detail more about your scum read on Farside, over the not scum read of Buldge?
In post 747, Vedith wrote:Why is your vote still on Dav? Do you think that he is lying then?
In post 747, Vedith wrote:You had a very null read overall on Ank. Would you be up for lynching him today or no?
In post 791, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:My pistachios stance is pretty much a too b atshit to be scum stance
In post 834, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:You know what, fuck it, come
lynch me i don't care anymore,it'll be fun to see your facefor mislynching Town Sakura, when you've never done that mistake before.
In post 785, Nachomamma8 wrote:@Lying Cat: Your argument that farside agreed with ETL twice and thus should be town reading ETL is a weak one.
In post 879, Davsto wrote:PEdit: How about Concrete's case on Pistach which I literally mentioned in that goddamn post?
In post 886, Thor665 wrote:
That comes from my belief that players tend to scumread people who scumread them.
In post 904, Nachomamma8 wrote:It seems like most people in this thread are townreading Vedith based on his attack on Ank.
In post 907, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:Who in this playerlist would you anticipate me being paranoid of Nacho?
And it's not the same with pie regarding ETL- I think she would be funneling it into the scum PT rather than in-thread.
In post 895, Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:notty also warned me that he was looking for someone else to throw into the fire after he couldn't push us anymore and that whoever he chose would be Town (In this case Cataphant), he didn't want me to vote him until he had done that.
In post 911, Wingback wrote:
In post 785, Nachomamma8 wrote:@Lying Cat: Your argument that farside agreed with ETL twice and thus should be town reading ETL is a weak one.
I've made this same argument. Why didn't you ask me about it?
In post 414, Lying Cat wrote:The reason you aren't scum with far is the same reason she might be scum.
In post 414, Lying Cat wrote:As far as reads, you're slightly town, but you need to be more town. Far and cat are both possible scum for different, possibly mutually exclusive (although I'll think more on that) reasons.
In post 457, Lying Cat wrote:Next on the list is ETAngels.
In post 457, Lying Cat wrote:Of course, that brings us to Sakura.
In post 457, Lying Cat wrote:Which leaves us to the other course: Thor.
In post 457, Lying Cat wrote:And I'm beating him over the head with inane and stupid bullshit to get him to the point where he lashes out.
In post 902, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 883, Davsto wrote:In post 769, Nachomamma8 wrote:It'll likely take me a couple of days to properly catch up; want to try to catchup in a more pro town way than my usual "read nothing, start doing things later".
Just decided to look at Nacho's ISO and ahahahahaha
You don't think that my catchup has been protown? Why is that?
You're kidding me, right?In post 908, pistachi0n wrote:In post 747, Vedith wrote:Why is your vote still on Dav? Do you think that he is lying then?
He avoided taking a stance on anything in his early play, yes, I think he's lying about being The Birds.
In post 915, Wingback wrote:@ Nachomamma8
In post 911, Wingback wrote:
In post 785, Nachomamma8 wrote:@Lying Cat: Your argument that farside agreed with ETL twice and thus should be town reading ETL is a weak one.
I've made this same argument. Why didn't you ask me about it?
In post 908, pistachi0n wrote:He avoided taking a stance on anything in his early play, yes, I think he's lying about being The Birds.