In post 695, Ether wrote:I didn't mean worse for me.Post 690, SilverWolf wrote:You should not be afraid of this if you are town and think GM is town.
Do you mean worse for the whole town? Because you're so definitely, assuredly town?
In post 695, Ether wrote:I didn't mean worse for me.Post 690, SilverWolf wrote:You should not be afraid of this if you are town and think GM is town.
In post 701, SilverWolf wrote:A NL on D1 is really bad for town.
In post 702, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 701, SilverWolf wrote:A NL on D1 is really bad for town.
So much this.
You're kind of annoying!In post 700, Mightymandarin wrote:In post 695, Ether wrote:I didn't mean worse for me.Post 690, SilverWolf wrote:You should not be afraid of this if you are town and think GM is town.
Do you mean worse for the whole town? Because you're so definitely, assuredly town?
In post 704, Ether wrote:You're kind of annoying!
And no, that's obviously not what I meant in context.
In post 708, Ether wrote:I don't knowwhatto do about it. I reached out to goodmorning, she hasn't budged from a lynch she can't get and somehow managed to dig herself deeper in the process, I'd counterwagon if I had a clue what a viable counterwagon would even be, feel like I barely have any common ground with anyone here to work with them let alone four of them, I don't even know.
Like I said, I'm not interested in answering every single wall of text question you come up with. You can repeat what you want if you want it, but waiting over 36 hours between posts after you did your big catchup doesn't really convince me that you care all that much. (Also, I didn't actually read them that thoroughly, not gonna lie. I was kind of expecting you to actually talk to people once you finished, I thought the catchup was more showing your work before you'd get to the fun part.)
Prod MoosyDoosy, please.
In post 173, Ether wrote:I'm going to unvote, even though I still think he's scum.
Huh?Post 709, Mightymandarin wrote:Annoying like the community you find yourself distanced from?
What did you mean then? I find your play to be annoying. You ignore any point I've (as well as others') been trying to make (whether they're good or not).
Post 714, Mightymandarin wrote:Opportunistic, [...], following the trends of the thread,
Which is it?Post 714, Mightymandarin wrote:You tried to get a few wagons on different people throughout the thread,
In post 705, lordj210 wrote:ive read through i still aint to shure but i know wee slowly running out of town id hate to vote for GM but i think in the need of getting a lynch(as even a ML is better then a NO for town) hopefully either way it flips we will be able to get some sort of more clear picture of what we have. im gonna VOTE: goodmorning
In post 716, Mightymandarin wrote:How do you post just a link to a person's post #?
Code: Select all
[post]post number you want to link[/post]
In post 718, Mightymandarin wrote:In post 705, lordj210 wrote:ive read through i still aint to shure but i know wee slowly running out of town id hate to vote for GM but i think in the need of getting a lynch(as even a ML is better then a NO for town) hopefully either way it flips we will be able to get some sort of more clear picture of what we have. im gonna VOTE: goodmorning
Isn't this a pretty bad reason to vote? You should be convinced by his argument, it should align with your own suspicions which you perhaps were unable to articulate yourself. It shouldn't be based on "well we gotta lynch somebody" even though I know we do.
Just to reiterate, we still have 30+ hours left, we've gotten all these votes on GM in about that amount of time.
Still, I guess there's so little information to go on Day 1, the first lynchisbased more on hunches/tone than deductive reasoning?