Mini 1717 Alfred Hitchcock UPick [GAME OVER]

Antihero · Post Post #1300 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:05 pm

A clear horizon — nothing to worry about on your plate, only things that are creative and not destructive… I can’t bear quarreling, I can’t bear feelings between people — I think hatred is wasted energy, and it’s all non-productive. I’m very sensitive — a sharp word, said by a person, say, who has a temper, if they’re close to me, hurts me for days. I know we’re only human, we do go in for these various emotions, call them negative emotions, but when all these are removed and you can look forward and the road is clear ahead, and now you’re going to create something — I think that’s as happy as I’ll ever want to be.

Vote Count 2.4

Cataphant - 3 (Thor665, Ankamius, Vedith)
Nachomamma8 - 3 (pistachi0n, Davsto, Hecatia Lapislazuli)
pistachi0n - 2 (Cataphant, farside22)

Not Voting: Concrete Angels, massive, Nachomamma8

6 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2015-11-04 17:52:11)

Ankamius · Post Post #1301 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:05 pm

In post 1300, Antihero wrote:mine

pff

Antihero · Post Post #1302 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:16 pm

In post 1301, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1300, Antihero wrote:mine

pff

your new name is cindy lou who.

everyone will refer to you by this name from now on or risk being modkilled.

farside22 · Post Post #1303 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 1:12 am

In post 1299, Ankamius wrote:Okay, step one: can someone quote for me their points on Pistachi0n?

Besides not really scum hunting. Asking pointless questions and just actively lurking.

No I'm thinking that's all I got.

Thor665 · Post Post #1304 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:58 am

In post 1295, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't understand why Cataphant is such a popular target today when they were ignored for most of yesterday while I was trying to get that going; anyone care to explain a change of heart?

What's not to understand?
He was the most popular of the choices you offered - so clearly there was support there.
You sat around reading up.
A push started on LC, who probably had more support than Cat.
You leaped onto the LC wagon without ever really pushing the Cat one.

Why does that confuse you to the gamestate today?

In post 1298, Cataphant wrote:@nacho, its because the wagon on me is opportunistic scum

I WAS THE ORIGINAL ONE ON PISTACHIO. Get out of here with your idiotic "no reasoning" bullshit, dav.

Are you intentionally dodging my question?
If so, let me know so I don't waste time bringing it up to you over and over.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p7321052

Thor665 · Post Post #1305 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:01 am

In post 1303, farside22 wrote:Besides not really scum hunting. Asking pointless questions and just actively lurking.

I can see with a squint not thinking he's scumhunting well and that his questions are pointless. I disagree and consider it more of a playstyle thing, but I can see where you're coming from there.
How are you justifying active lurk on him though?
Like, even just glancing at what he's posted this phase I do not even see that remotely supported as a concept. Clarify?

farside22 · Post Post #1306 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:33 am

In post 1305, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1303, farside22 wrote:Besides not really scum hunting. Asking pointless questions and just actively lurking.

I can see with a squint not thinking he's scumhunting well and that his questions are pointless. I disagree and consider it more of a playstyle thing, but I can see where you're coming from there.
How are you justifying active lurk on him though?
Like, even just glancing at what he's posted this phase I do not even see that remotely supported as a concept. Clarify?

Actively lurking.
Basically posting stuff but nothing really relevant.
In my view the post about Nacho is the only thing I've seen from her that wasn't socially akward or just noise

Thor665 · Post Post #1307 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:32 am

So you do agree that, at least starting today Pistach has leveled a case against someone, pressured them (these two points regardless of the elative quality you apply to said case and pressure), and isn't actively lurking?
So, is it last Day Phase they were active lurking?

farside22 · Post Post #1308 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:59 am

In post 1307, Thor665 wrote:So you do agree that, at least starting today Pistach has leveled a case against someone, pressured them (these two points regardless of the elative quality you apply to said case and pressure), and isn't actively lurking?
So, is it last Day Phase they were active lurking?

One post does not wipe that all away.
And that is exactly what it was, one post

Thor665 · Post Post #1309 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:02 pm

I disagree with the application of 'active lurk' to the entirety of Day 2 from Pistach.

You are claiming active lurk on Day 1?

Thor665 · Post Post #1310 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:02 pm

Why does getting ahold of your feelings here feel like wrestling with wet cookie dough?

Hecatia Lapislazuli · Post Post #1311 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:16 pm

People who are townreading Nacho: why?

pistachi0n · Post Post #1312 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 7:51 pm

I admit to lurking for the past two days--but whether or not anything I said was relevant, YMMV.

Davsto · Post Post #1313 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:10 pm

Since Nacho hasn't said anything about it, I jailed him last night. So all we know is that, if scum, he didn't make the nightkill. Jsyk.

farside22 · Post Post #1314 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:13 am

In post 1309, Thor665 wrote:I disagree with the application of 'active lurk' to the entirety of Day 2 from Pistach.

You are claiming active lurk on Day 1?

In post 1310, Thor665 wrote:Why does getting ahold of your feelings here feel like wrestling with wet cookie dough?

Maybe because I feel like it's obvious and I don't see your pov.
Is Pist engaging others day 2?
Not really
Is she really pushing her points any more day 2 then she did day 1?
No

Are you town reading her?

Thor665 · Post Post #1315 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:10 am

In post 1314, farside22 wrote:Is Pist engaging others day 2?
Not really

I see Pist both stating a scumread and engaging people about her scumread.
So, I would actually say - yes.
Even by you saying "not really" you are accepting that *something* is happening, just apparently not to a standard you are happy with...but, easily a vast swathe of the game is being more active lurk than that this phase, so what the hell?

In post 1314, farside22 wrote:Is she really pushing her points any more day 2 then she did day 1?
No

Does she push her points more when town than when scum?
Because if not - this is a meaningless point, and also, if she's pushing her points as much now as on Day 1 then i still don't get the active lurk claim.

In post 1314, farside22 wrote:Are you town reading her?

Yes.

farside22 · Post Post #1316 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:24 am

In post 1315, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1314, farside22 wrote:Is Pist engaging others day 2?
Not really

I see Pist both stating a scumread and engaging people about her scumread.
So, I would actually say - yes.
Even by you saying "not really" you are accepting that *something* is happening, just apparently not to a standard you are happy with...but, easily a vast swathe of the game is being more active lurk than that this phase, so what the hell?

In post 1314, farside22 wrote:Is she really pushing her points any more day 2 then she did day 1?
No

Does she push her points more when town than when scum?
Because if not - this is a meaningless point, and also, if she's pushing her points as much now as on Day 1 then i still don't get the active lurk claim.

In post 1314, farside22 wrote:Are you town reading her?

Yes.

You act like this is new.
Serious question but what is your experience when you see players that flip scum?

This isn't a meta thing. This is what I see over and over and over again and it just makes me look at players like really? You don't see this in every game?
A play that just pushes mild points and lurkers most of the game while others are trying to figure the game out.
A player that makes a few weak points and then disappears when a real conversation is going on.
I see it so much and so often I go well there is scum.
And I get this same thing of well this person here reads town so I'm sticking with it.
All the while I just glare at the computer screen and ask myself 10 times over are people dumb or scum.

EspeciallyTheLies · Post Post #1317 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:26 am

In post 1310, Thor665 wrote:Why does getting ahold of your feelings here feel like wrestling with wet cookie dough?

The irony.

It is thick.

Concrete Angels · Post Post #1318 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:29 am

In post 1317, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
In post 1310, Thor665 wrote:Why does getting ahold of your feelings here feel like wrestling with wet cookie dough?

The irony.

It is thick.

Mine. My bad.

VOTE: Pistachi0n

Let's do this.

Davsto · Post Post #1319 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:31 am

Are we going to pustachi0n?

Concrete Angels · Post Post #1320 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:35 am

Nacho votes are illogical and stupid at this point, given information. I'd like to see pistachio hang before Cataphant, personally. Se let's get it going.

Concrete Angels · Post Post #1321 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:38 am

Dav why are you voting Nacho if you jailed him last night and you know for a fact that he couldn't have made a kill?

Davsto · Post Post #1322 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:40 am

There are more than one scum, maybe another one made the kill

*surprised gasp*

*fainting*

Like seriously, the fuck are you expecting me to say?

Concrete Angels · Post Post #1323 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:41 am

In post 1322, Davsto wrote:There are more than one scum, maybe another one made the kill

*surprised gasp*

*fainting*

Like seriously, the fuck are you expecting me to say?

This is a weird reaction... I'm just curious why you would decide to vote someone who has less chance of being scum than another player.

Concrete Angels · Post Post #1324 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:44 am

Are you no longer scumreading pistachi0n?