Mini 1732 - Super Smash Bros. Project M(afia) - D7!

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:04 pm

In post 697, Nana wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4

The OMGUS and Beetlejuice have come out of their shell?
Is it possible for a game-themed, non-player alt to be so. goddamn. scummy?

Pedit: She claimed non-survivor

Davsto · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:06 pm

In post 698, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 695, Firebringer wrote:What the 'right' amount of theory crafting?

One step of setup assumption: OK

3 Three or more setup assumptions: Red flag galore.

Setup speculation/assumption is very common for me.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:09 pm

In post 701, Davsto wrote:
In post 698, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 695, Firebringer wrote:What the 'right' amount of theory crafting?

One step of setup assumption: OK

3 Three or more setup assumptions: Red flag galore.

Setup speculation/assumption is very common for me.

Then you need to stop doing it cuz I will be scum reading you for it until proven otherwise.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:11 pm

In post 700, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 697, Nana wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4

The OMGUS and Beetlejuice have come out of their shell?
Is it possible for a game-themed, non-player alt to be so. goddamn. scummy?

Pedit: She claimed non-survivor

No, she didn't ant its looking like you really want a quick lynch here. At the beginning of the game when its all for lols is one thing, but right now BWCS is bad Town play or Scummy Scum push.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:12 pm

In post 675, Nana wrote:I am not claiming survivor.
Nice try though.

Davsto · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:14 pm

In post 702, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 701, Davsto wrote:
In post 698, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 695, Firebringer wrote:What the 'right' amount of theory crafting?

One step of setup assumption: OK

3 Three or more setup assumptions: Red flag galore.

Setup speculation/assumption is very common for me.

Then you need to stop doing it cuz I will be scum reading you for it until proven otherwise.

I'm not going to stop doing things that I find helpful just because you tell me not to, broski.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:16 pm

In post 704, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 675, Nana wrote:I am not claiming survivor.
Nice try though.

yeah, says "Not Claiming survivor." Well Nana can be basically summed up as "I'm not

claiming

Survivor, but I'm voting with town and want town to win even though I may not be town."

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:20 pm

In post 706, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 704, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 675, Nana wrote:I am not claiming survivor.
Nice try though.

yeah, says "Not Claiming survivor." Well Nana can be basically summed up as "I'm not
claiming
Survivor, but I'm voting with town and want town to win even though I may not be town."

You trust Nana to vote with town how?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:22 pm

In post 705, Davsto wrote:
In post 702, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 701, Davsto wrote:
In post 698, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 695, Firebringer wrote:What the 'right' amount of theory crafting?

One step of setup assumption: OK

3 Three or more setup assumptions: Red flag galore.

Setup speculation/assumption is very common for me.

Then you need to stop doing it cuz I will be scum reading you for it until proven otherwise.

I'm not going to stop doing things that I find helpful just because you tell me not to, broski.

How can you seriously be saying this right now?!?! Like, do you not see how making a trail of assumptions solves absolutely nothing in this game and is pretty much just mental masterbation at this point? Like making one assumption

in context

is nothing to even bat an eye at. Two is like "huh?" But Three is like "what in the fuck does this even do for Town?"

Its enough for a vote in my book.

VOTE: Dav

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:23 pm

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:25 pm

In post 707, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 706, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 704, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 675, Nana wrote:I am not claiming survivor.
Nice try though.

yeah, says "Not Claiming survivor." Well Nana can be basically summed up as "I'm not
claiming
Survivor, but I'm voting with town and want town to win even though I may not be town."

You trust Nana to vote with town how?

No I'm saying we need to wait until Nana gives us something before we jump all over her like white on rice. I mean, if you ask me, Nana is pretty much too scummy to be scum at this point. Unless there is like some really heavy shit in her role that she just needs to stay alive long enough to with the game for their team I don't see Nana being this obvious about not contributing anything.

All I'm saying is we wait a day or two before we judge this spot unnecessarily.

Davsto · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:26 pm

In post 709, MarioManiac4 wrote:

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:27 pm

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=63148

This whole game is one big lesson about the "too scummy to be scum" fallacy.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:33 pm

Falcon Kick: Nana

Nana · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:34 pm

Did you just day vig me?

Nana · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:35 pm

Seriously, is that for real?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:36 pm

Nana is Town aligned.

Nana · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:39 pm

In post 716, LicketyQuickety wrote:Nana is Town aligned.

Want to explain that?
How did those two posts give you a good enough reaction to tell you that.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:40 pm

@Nana, why are you not voting Dav right now?

Nana · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:40 pm

I almost posted why you just screwed over the town.
So luckily you posted before I did.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:40 pm

In post 718, LicketyQuickety wrote:@Nana, why are you not voting Dav right now?

Stop giving scum an excuse to vote town.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:41 pm

In post 717, Nana wrote:
In post 716, LicketyQuickety wrote:Nana is Town aligned.

Want to explain that?
How did those two posts give you a good enough reaction to tell you that.

No I really don't.

I just know you want town to win, but I have no idea what your role/alignment is.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:42 pm

VOTE: MarioManiac4

Let kill Scum guys.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:43 pm

Nana. There's no way you're Town and there's no way non-Town hold the key to a town win.
You can survive Lickety's "dayvig", but can you survive mine?

SIDEKICK BLAST: NANA

Nana · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:43 pm

I am not falling for that twice.
Fool me once, thats enough.